Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:10:31.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

David Sewell
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England
Barrie Burnet
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England
Kevin Connolly
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The larvae of Drosophila melanogaster feed continuously during their period of development. The rate of feeding activity, measured as the number of cephalopharyngeal retractions per minute, varies with the physiological age of the larva. Feeding rate responded readily to directional selection to give rise to non-overlapping populations with fast and slow feeding larvae, respectively. Realized heritabilities for the character from different selected lines varied between 11 and 21%. Crosses between the selected populations show significant dominance for fast feeding rate and appreciable non-allelic gene interaction. Larvae of the slow feeding populations showed a correlated reduction in locomotor activity but fast feeding larvae do not move about significantly faster than the unselected controls. Asymmetry of the correlated response to selection, it is argued, is due to selection in the slow feeding populations of alleles with a secondary effect in both behaviours.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, K. (1961). An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie 14, 200281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, K. (1969). Selection for rate of growth and its influence on competitive ability of larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 19, 541595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, B., Connolly, K. & Mallinson, M. (1974). Activity and sexual behavior of neurological mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour Genetics 4, 223231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connolly, K. (1966). Locomotor activity in Drosophila. II. Selection for active and inactive strains. Animal Behaviour 14, 444449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, W. D. (1972). Genetic and behavioral studies of Drosophila neurological mutants. In Biology of Behavior (ed. Kiger, J. A.), pp. 133157. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Kearsey, M. J. (1965). The interaction of competition and food supply in two lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 20, 169181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lát, J. & Gollová-Hémon, E. (1969). Permanent effects of nutritional and endocrinological intervention in early ontogeny on the level of non-specific excitability and on lability (emotionality). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 159, 710720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. A. (1973). Behavioural and Ecological Genetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sang, J. H. (1956). The quantitative nutritional requirements of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of experimental Biology 33, 4572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, J. H. & Burnet, B. (1968). Physiological genetics of melanotic tumors in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Amino acid metabolism and tumor formation in the tu bw; st su-tu strain. Genetics 59, 211235.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1954). The Physiology of Insect Metamorphosis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar