Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:23:58.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental evolution in Heterandria formosa, a livebearing fish: group selection on population size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2000

CHARLES F. BAER
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
JOSEPH TRAVIS
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
KEVIN HIGGINS
Affiliation:
Ecology and Evolution Program, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1210, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Group selection has historically been an important and controversial subject in evolutionary biology. There is now a compelling body of evidence, both theoretical and experimental, that group selection not only can be effective, but can be effective in situations when individual selection is not. However, experiments in which true population-level traits have been shown to evolve in response to group selection are currently limited to two species of flour beetle in the genus Tribolium and RNA viruses. Here we report the results of an experiment wherein we imposed group selection via differential extinction for increased and decreased population size at 6-week intervals, a true population-level trait, in the poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa. In contrast to most other group selection experiments, we observed no evolutionary response after six rounds of group selection in either the up- or down-selected lines. Populational heritability for population size was low, if not actually negative. Our results suggest that group selection via differential extinction may be effective only if population sizes are very small and/or migration rates are low.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press