Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Estoup, Arnaud
Gharbi, Karim
SanCristobal, Magali
Chevalet, Claude
Haffray, Pierrick
and
Guyomard, René
1998.
Parentage assignment using microsatellites in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatchery populations.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
715.
MARSHALL, T. C.
SLATE, J.
KRUUK, L. E. B.
and
PEMBERTON, J. M.
1998.
Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 5,
p.
639.
Bernatchez, Louis
and
Duchesne, Pierre
2000.
Individual-based genotype analysis in studies of parentage and population assignment: how many loci, how many alleles?.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Slate, Jon
Marshall, Tristan
and
Pemberton, Josephine
2000.
A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program cervus.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 6,
p.
801.
Gerber, S.
Mariette, S.
Streiff, R.
Bodénès, C.
and
Kremer, A.
2000.
Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 8,
p.
1037.
Letcher, Benjamin H
and
King, Tim L
2001.
Parentage and grandparentage assignment with known and unknown matings: application to Connecticut River Atlantic salmon restoration.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 9,
p.
1812.
Landry, C.
Garant, D.
Duchesne, P.
and
Bernatchez, L.
2001.
‘Good genes as heterozygosity’: the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 268,
Issue. 1473,
p.
1279.
Duchesne, Pierre
Godbout, Marie‐Hélène
and
Bernatchez, Louis
2002.
papa (package for the analysis of parental allocation): a computer program for simulated and real parental allocation.
Molecular Ecology Notes,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Wilson, A J
and
Ferguson, M M
2002.
Molecular pedigree analysis in natural populations of fishes: approaches, applications, and practical considerations.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 10,
p.
1696.
Villanueva, B.
Verspoor, E.
and
Visscher, P. M.
2002.
Parental assignment in fish using microsatellite genetic markers with finite numbers of parents and offspring.
Animal Genetics,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Blouin, Michael S.
2003.
DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 10,
p.
503.
Jones, Adam G.
and
Ardren, William R.
2003.
Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 10,
p.
2511.
Oddou‐Muratorio, S.
Houot, M.‐L.
Demesure‐Musch, B.
and
Austerlitz, F.
2003.
Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 12,
p.
3427.
Wang, Jinliang
2004.
Sibship Reconstruction From Genetic Data With Typing Errors.
Genetics,
Vol. 166,
Issue. 4,
p.
1963.
Slavov, G. T.
Howe, G. T.
Yakovlev, I.
Edwards, K. J.
Krutovskii, K. V.
Tuskan, G. A.
Carlson, J. E.
Strauss, S. H.
and
Adams, W. T.
2004.
Highly variable SSR markers in Douglas-fir: Mendelian inheritance and map locations.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics,
Vol. 108,
Issue. 5,
p.
873.
Hayes, Ben
Sonesson, Anna K.
and
Gjerde, Bjarne
2005.
Evaluation of three strategies using DNA markers for traceability in aquaculture species.
Aquaculture,
Vol. 250,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
70.
ARAKI, HITOSHI
and
BLOUIN, MICHAEL S.
2005.
Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 13,
p.
4097.
GARANT, DANY
and
KRUUK, LOESKE E. B.
2005.
How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 7,
p.
1843.
MORRISSEY, MICHAEL B.
and
WILSON, ALASTAIR J.
2005.
The potential costs of accounting for genotypic errors in molecular parentage analyses.
Molecular Ecology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 13,
p.
4111.
DUCHESNE, PIERRE
CASTRIC, TANGUY
and
BERNATCHEZ, LOUIS
2005.
pasos (parental allocation of singles in open systems): a computer program for individual parental allocation with missing parents.
Molecular Ecology Notes,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
701.