Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:28:37.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epigenetic polymorphism in wild populations of Mus musculus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

R. J. Berry
R. J. Berry
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Experimental Genetics Research Unit, University College, Gower Street, London, W.C.1*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has been suggested (Berry & Searle, 1963) that the discontinuous (‘quasi-continuous’) variants studied by Grüneberg et al. in the skeleton of rodents can be regarded as constituting epigenetic polymorphism in different populations. Comparisons have been made between the incidences of skeletal variants in house mouse populations collected from: corn ricks on a single farm in Hampshire; eleven separated localities in different parts of the British Isles; and nine other places throughout the world. These showed that the method could profitably be used for genetically characterizing and hence comparing populations. There was evidence suggestive of genetical drift between local populations and stabilizing selection over a larger area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , July 1963 , pp. 193 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

REFERENCES

Berry, R. J. & Searle, A. G. (1963). Epigenetic polymorphism in rodents. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., in the press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. Z. (1953). Social behaviour, reproduction and population changes in the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Ecol. Monogr. 23, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitty, D. (1957). Self-regulation of numbers through changes in viability. Cold. Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 22, 277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, J. J. (1956). Adrenal and reproductive responses in mice from freely growing populations. Ecology, 37, 258–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S. (1955). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XIV. Minor variations of the skull. J. Genet. 53, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S. (1958). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XXIV. Further data on skeletal variation in wild populations. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 6, 569–574.Google ScholarPubMed
Deol, M. S. & Truslove, G. M. (1957). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XX. Maternal physiology and variation in the skeleton of C57BL mice. J. Genet. 55, 288–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S., Grüneberg, H., Searle, A. G. & Truslove, G. M. (1957). Genetical differentiation involving morphological characters in an inbred strain of mice. I. A British branch of the C57BL strain. J. Morph. 100, 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deol, M. S., Grüneberg, H., Searle, A. G. & Truslove, G. M. (1960). How pure are our inbred strains of mice? Genet. Res. 1, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. C., Beasley, A. B. & Tinker, H. (1960). Polymorphisms in populations of wild house mice. J. Mammal. 41, 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, M. S. (1962 a). The rate of genetic divergence of sublines in the C57BL strain of mice. Genet. Res. 3, 226–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, M. S. (1962 b). The development of an inherited tooth defect in the mouse. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 10, 202–211.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1950). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. I. Minor variations of the vertebral column. J. Genet. 50, 112–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grüneberg, H. (1955). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XV. Relations between major and minor variants. J. Genet. 53, 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1961). Evidence for genetic drift in Indian rats (Rattus rattles L.). Evolution, 15, 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, P. S. E. G. (1958). Skeletal variation in wild house mice from Peru. Ann. Mag.nat. Hist., ser. 13, i, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, E. M. O. (1946). The reproduction of the house mouse (Mus musculus) living in different environments. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 133, 248–281.Google ScholarPubMed
Luther, P. G. (1949). Enzymatic maceration of skeletons. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 161, 146.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P. (1962). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P., Taylor, E. J. & Chudley, A. H. J. (1961). The poison baiting of corn-ricks with particular reference to the control of house-mice. Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 571–577.Google Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1954 a). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. IX. Causes of skeletal variation within pure lines. J. Genet. 52, 68–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1954 b). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XI. The influence of diet on variation within pure lines. J. Genet. 52, 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1960). The genetics and evolution of threshold characters. Proc. cent. bicent. Congr., Singapore, 220–224.Google Scholar
Searle, A. G. (1962). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Southern, H. N. & Laurie, E. M. O. (1946). The house mouse (Mus musculus) in corn ricks. J. anim. Ecol. 15, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, C. H. (1955). Regulatory mechanism of house-mouse populations: social behaviour affecting litter survival. Ecology, 36, 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, C. H. (1958). Population characteristics of house mice living in English corn ricks: density relationships. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 131, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truslove, G. M. (1961). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. XXX. A search for correlations between some minor variants. Genet. Res. 2, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, W. (1950). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. III. Skeletal variation in wild populations. J. Genet. 50, 174–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf, B. (1957). The log likelihood ratio test (the G-test). Ann. hum. Genet. 21, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed