Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:32:45.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of X-rays on quantitative characters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

G. A. Clayton  and
Alan Robertson
G. A. Clayton
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Alan Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh, 9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The rate of production by X-rays of new genetic variation in two quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster (sternital and sternopleural bristles) has been investigated, using ‘plateaued’ populations which had reached the limit under artificial selection and, for sternital bristles only, populations which had been made genetically invariant by inbreeding. The genetic variation was always measured by the response of the population to selection. The X-rays dose given in any generation was always 1800 r. to adults.

2. Seven plateaued lines had eight cycles of alternate irradiation and selection, each with its non-irradiated control. All the responses were small but in three lines they were significantly greater after irradiation.

3. Selection was applied to three different inbred lines, genetically marked to detect contamination, after varying periods of irradiation. At the same time, the inbred lines and lines derived from them which had been mass mated in bottles were selected. The irradiated populations showed a greater response. The new genetic variance produced by the irradiation was approximately 10−5 units/r. The estimate of the dose required to introduce new variation equal to that in a standard outbred population was 500,000 r.

4. The effective population size was an important factor in the interpretation of some of these results on the long-term effects of radiation. By observing the variation between replicate lines in the frequency of a gene with a visible effect under these culture conditions (i.e. in a single culture bottle) the effective population size was estimated at sixty. Outbred populations kept under these conditions for many generations showed a reduction of genetic variability in agreement with this value.

5. To investigate the possibility that the deleterious genes produced by irradiation would interfere with the response to artificial selection, a standard outbred population was irradiated and selected. In spite of the observed high frequency of recessive lethals produced, the response to selection was very similar to that of the standard population.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 1964 , pp. 410 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Buri, P. (1956). Gene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila. Evolution, 10, 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzati-Traverso, A. A. (1953). On the role of mutation rate in evolution. Proc. IX Intern. Cong. Genet., Bellagio. 450–462.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. & Robertson, Alan (1955). Mutation and quantitative variation. Amer. Nat. 89, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. (1961). Are induced mutations overdominant. II. Experimental results. Genetics, 46, 737–757.Google Scholar
McBride, G. & Robertson, A. (1963). Selection using assortative mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res., 4, 356–369.Google Scholar
Rokizky, P. (1936). Experimental analysis of the problems of selection by X-ray irradiation. Uspehi Zootehniceskih Nauk, 2, 161–202.Google Scholar
Scossiroli, R. E. (1953). Effectiveness of artificial selection under irradiation of plateaued populations of D. melanogaster. Proc. Symp. Genetics of Pop. Struct., Pavia, 42–66.Google Scholar
Scossiroli, R. E. & Scossiroli, S. (1959). On the relative role of mutation and recombination in response to selection for polygenic traits in irradiated populations of D. melanogaster. Int. J. Rad. Biol. 1 (1), 61–69.Google Scholar
Serebrovsky, R. E. (1935). Acceleration of the rate of selection of quantitative characters in D. melanogaster by the action of X-rays. Zoologiceskii Zurnal, 14, 465–480.Google Scholar
Wallace, B. (1958). The average effect of radiation-induced mutations on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 12, 532–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Y. & Kitagawa, O. (1961). Doubling dose for polygenic mutations in D. melanogaster. Jap. J. Genet. 36 (3–4), 76–83.Google Scholar