Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:22:01.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of selection for development rate on reproductive onset in female mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1999

C. A. ERNST
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7614, USA
P. D. CRENSHAW
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7614, USA
W. R. ATCHLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7614, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This research reports analyses of correlated response in reproductive onset in ICR mice after 23 generations of restricted index selection for divergent body weight gain, early (birth–10 days) or later (28–56 days) in life. Long-term selection altered growth trajectories and 56 day body weight of individuals under different selection regimes in this study. Mice in lines under early selection have the same percentage mature weight at vaginal opening as controls (63%). Vaginal opening is delayed in mice selected for slow early growth, which take longer to reach what appears to be a weight threshold. In contrast, individuals in lines selected for later slow growth undergo vaginal opening at the same age as controls, but at a lower weight and increased percentage mature weight. Pre-compensation or ‘counter-balance growth’ is observed in these lines, with mice selected for late enhanced growth reaching 52% of mature weight at vaginal opening while mice with late slow growth attain 71% of mature weight prior to vaginal opening. Only 42% of mice with late slow growth attain first oestrus by 56 days. We speculate this is a function of growth rate and fat/lean ratio. Mice with early slow growth show compensatory growth, reaching first oestrus at a similar time to controls. We conclude that selection for growth rate has asymmetrically affected reproductive onset, with lines selected for suppressed gains experiencing delays in the reproductive onset traits measured.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press