Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:01:54.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of population size on effective population size: an empirical study in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Leslie A. Pray ,
Charles J. Goodnight ,
Lori Stevens ,
James M. Schwartz  and
Guiyun Yan
Leslie A. Pray
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
Charles J. Goodnight
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
Lori Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
James M. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
Guiyun Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite the increasing number of studies on the magnitude of Ne/N ratios, much remains unknown about the effects of demographic and environmental variables on Ne/N. We determined Ne/N for seven population size treatments, ranging from N = 2 to N = 960, in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Ne/N decreased with increasing N, as evidenced by a significant negative relationship between log N and Ne/N. Our results are consistent with other published data on the relationship between Ne/N and N. Effective population sizes in large populations may be much smaller than previously recognized. These results have important implications for conservation and evolutionary biology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , October 1996 , pp. 151 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

Avise, J. C., (1992). Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63, 62–76.Google Scholar
Briscoe, D. A., Malpica, J. M., Robertson, A., Smith, G. J., Frankham, R., Banks, R. G., & Barker, J. S. F., (1992). Rapid loss of genetic variation in large captive populations of Drosophila flies: implications for the genetic management of captive populations. Conservation Biology 6, 416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buri, P., (1956). Gene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila. Evolution 10, 367–402.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M., (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Minnesota: Burgess Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F., & Morton, N. E., (1955). Measurement of gene frequency drift in small populations. Evolution 9, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S., (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Frankham, R., (1995). Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, I. R. (1980). Evolutionary change in small populations. In Conservation Biology (ed. Soule, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A.), pp. 135–150. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Husband, B. C. & Barrett, S. C. H., (1992). Effective population size and genetic drift in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 46, 1875–1890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husband, B. C., & Barrett, S. C. H., (1995). Estimating effective population size: a reply to Nunney. Evolution 49, 392–394.Google Scholar
Kerr, W. E., & Wright, S., (1954a). Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Forked. Evolution 8, 172–177.Google Scholar
Kerr, W. E., & Wright, S., (1954b). Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Aristapedia and spineless. Evolution 8, 293–302.Google Scholar
Kimura, M., & Crow, J. F., (1963). The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17, 279–288.Google Scholar
Lande, R., (1995). Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9, 782–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R., & Barrowclough, G. F., (1987). Effective population size, genetic variation and their use in population management. In Viable Populations for Conservation (ed. Soule, M. E.), pp. 87–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, G. M., & Lande, R., (1991). Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology 5, 148–157.Google Scholar
Nei, M., & Graur, D., (1984). Extent of protein polymorphism and the neutral mutation theory. In Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 17 (ed. Hecht, M. K., Wallace, B. & Prance, G. T.), pp. 73–118. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Nozawa, K., (1970). Estimation of the effective size in Drosophila.experimental populations. Drosophila Information Service 45, 117–118.Google Scholar
Nunney, L., (1993). The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47, 1329–1341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunney, L., (1995). Measuring the ratio of effective population size to adult numbers using genetic and ecological data. Evolution 49, 389–392.Google Scholar
Nunney, L., & Elam, D. R., (1994). Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conservation Biology 8, 175–184.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. M., Stevens, L., & Goff, P. W., (1996). Frequency-dependent fitness in Tribolium castaneum: viability selection, fecundity selection and rare male mating advantage. Heredity (in the press).Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E. (1980). Thresholds for survival. In Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (ed. Sould, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A.), pp. 151–169. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E. (1987). Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tear, T. H., Scott, J. M., Hayward, P. H., & Griffith, B., (1995). Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data? Conservation Biology 9, 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J., (1980). Effective population size: the effects of sex, genotype, and density on the mean and variance of offspring numbers in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Genetical Research 36, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J., (1984). Variance in effective population number: the effects of sex ratio and density on the mean and variance of offspring numbers in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Genetical Research 43, 249–256.Google Scholar
Wright, S., (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159.Google Scholar
Wright, S., & Kerr, W. E., (1954). Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Bar. Evolution 8, 225–240.Google Scholar