Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:44:24.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dominance modification in a fluctuating environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Brian Charlesworth  and
Deborah Charlesworth
Brian Charlesworth
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, U.K.
Deborah Charlesworth
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines the suggestion of Gale & Mackay (1979) that dominance modification will be slower in an environment with fluctuating selection coefficients than in a constant environment. The case of statistical independence between successive environments is studied. It is shown that there is an effect in the suggested direction, but that it is quantitatively slight with biologically plausible values for the parameters involved. It therefore seems unlikely that the phenomena noted by Charlesworth (1979) can be explained in these terms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 281 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

REFERENCES

Charlesworth, B. (1979). Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance. Nature 278, 848–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1928). The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. American Naturalist 62, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, J. S. & Mackay, I. J. (1979). Evolution of dominance. Nature 280, 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, J. H. (1973). Polymorphism in random environments. Theoretical Population Biology 4, 193–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1930). A note on Fisher's theory of the origin of dominance. American Naturalist 64, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. & Jayakar, S. D. (1963). Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. Journal of Genetics 58, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartl, D. L. (1977). Mutation–selection balance with stochastic selection. Genetics 86, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlin, S. & Feldman, M. W. (1971). The evolution of dominance. A direct approach through the theory of linkage and selection. Theoretical Population Biology 2, 482–492.Google Scholar
Sved, J. A. & Mayo, O. (1970). The evolution of dominance. In Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K.), pp. 288–316. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1929). Fisher's theory of dominance. American Naturalist 63, 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar