Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:02:26.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of human chromosomes on the metaphase plate. Symmetrical arrangement in human male cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

M. Dolores Coll ,
Carlos M. Cuadras  and
Jose Egozcue
M. Dolores Coll
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, and Instituto de Biología Fundamental, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Carlos M. Cuadras
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics (Biostatistics), Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Jose Egozcue
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, and Instituto de Biología Fundamental, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two linear models have been devised and applied to the study of the distribution of human male chromosomes on the metaphase plate in preparations from lymphocyte cultures not treated with spindle poisons. Using these it has been found that the chromosomes are approximately distributed around a centre of symmetry and that the lines joining the centromeres of homologous chromosomes (i.e. segments) have the centre of symmetry approximately at their mid-point. Thus each chromosome mirrors the position of its homologue relative to the centre of symmetry. The position of each chromosome in the metaphase plate was found to be approximately constant relative to the centre of symmetry and the other chromosomes. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to the hypothesis on the distribution of the chromosomes in interphase nuclei and to data on acrocentric associations, acrocentric-non-acrocentric associations and the frequency of the most common translocations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 219 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Barton, D. E. & David, F. N. (1962). The analysis of chromosome patterns in normal cell. Annals of Human Genetics 25, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, D. E., David, F. N. & Merrington, M. (1965). The relative positions of the chromosomes in the human cell in mitosis. Annals of Human Genetics 29, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beatty-De Sana, J. W., Hoggard, M. J. & Cooledge, J. W. (1978). The relative positions of the chromosomes in the human cell in mitosis. Nature 255, 242–243.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. M., Enis, P. & Pfeifer, C. G. (1972). An investigation of somatic pairing in the muntjak. Cytogenetics 11, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comings, D. E. (1968). The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. American Journal of Human Genetics 20, 440–460.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuadras, C. M. (1974). Análisis estadistico multivariante y representación canónica de funciones estimables. Barcelona, Seeretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Cuadras, C. M. (1974). Análisis discriminante de funciones paramétricas estimables. Trabajos de Estadistica e Investigación Operativos 25, 3–31.Google Scholar
Cuadras, C. M. (1977). CANG, versión II; Instrucciones de utilización. Laboratorio de cálculo, Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Cuadras, C. M., Petitpierre, E. & Coll, M. D. (1977). Generalized discriminant canonical analysis: applications to biology, psychology, and medicine. First World Conference on Mathematics at the Service of Man. Barcelona, Universidad Politécnia de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Egozcue, J. (1968). Spontaneous chromosomal exchanges in Primates. Genetics 60, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedak, G. & Helgason, S. B.(1970). Somatic association of chromosomes in barley. Canadian Journal of Genetic Cytology 12, 449–500.Google Scholar
Feldman, M., Mello-Sampayo, T. & Sears, E. R. (1966). Somatic association in Triticum aestivum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Washington) 56, 1192–1199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagne, R. & Laberge, C. (1973). Specific cytological segment of number 9 chromosome in man. Experimental Cell Research 73, 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagne, R., Laberge, C. & Tanguay, R. (1972). Interphase association of Y-body' with nucleolus. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 130, 254–258.Google ScholarPubMed
Galperin, H. (1968). Etude de la distribution génerate des 46 chromosomes dans les cellules humaines en metaphase. Humangenetik 6, 118–130.Google Scholar
Galperin, H. (1969). Relative positions of homologous chromosomes or groups in male and female metaphase figures. Humangenetik 7, 265–274.Google ScholarPubMed
Golub, G. H. & Reinsch, C. (1970). Singular value decomposition and least square solutions. Numerische Matematik 14, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, M. M. (1972). Distance Analysis in Biology. Systematic Zoology 21, 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, F., Mc Caw, B. K., Peakman, D. & Robinson, A. (1978). Distance Analysis in Biology. Nature 255, 243–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heneen, W. K. & Nichols, W. W. (1972). Non-random arrangement of metaphase chromosomes in cultured cells of the Indian deer, Muntiacus muntjak. Cytogenetics 11, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoo, Y. Y. & Cramer, H. (1971). On the position of chromosomes in prepared mitotic figures of human fibroblasts. Humangenetik 13, 166–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juricek, D. K. (1975). Non-random chromosome distribution in radial metaphases from Chinese hamster. Chromosoma (Berlin) 50, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefebvre, J. (1976). Introduction aux Analyses Statiatiques Multidimensionals. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Martinell, J. & Cuadras, C. M. (1977). Bioestadistica y análisis multivariable aplicados a la comparación de una Poblaciónactual y otra fósil, atribuidos a Sphaeronassa mutabilis (Linné): aportación a la sistemática del género Sphaeronassa Locard, 1866. Studia Geologica 13, 89–103.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, M. (1971). Identification of G-group anomalies in Down's syndrome by qninacrine dihydrochloride fluorescence staining. Human Genetics 12, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, O. J., Mukherjee, B. B., Berg, W. K. & Gamble, A. V. N. (1963 a). Non-random distribution of chromosomes in metaphase figures from cultured human leukocytes. I. The peripheral location of the Y chromosome. Cytogenetics 2, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, O. J., Berg, W. R., Mukerjee, B. B., Gamble, A. V. N. & Christakos, A. C. (1963 b). Non-random distribution of chromosomes in metaphase figures from cultured human leukocytes. II. The peripheral location of chromosomes 13, 17, 18 and 21. Cytogenetics 2, 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhead, P. S., Nowell, P. C., Mellman, W. J., Battips, D. M. & Hungerford, D. A. (1960). Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Experimental Cell Research 20, 613–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ockey, C. H. (1969). The position of chromosomes at metaphase in human fibroblasts and their DNA syntesis behaviour. Chromosoma (Berlin) 27, 308–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peris, A., Romeu, J. & Cuadras, C. M. (1975). Valoración de la actividad del Ludiomil a través de un ensayo multicéntrico. Archives of Neurobiology 38, 471–484.Google Scholar
Petitpierre, E. & Cuadras, C. M. (1977). The canonical analysis applied to the taxonomy and evolution of the genus Timarcha Latr Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae. Mediterranea 2, 13–28.Google Scholar
Pringle, R. M. & Rayner, A. A. (1971). Generalized Inverse Matrixes with Applications to Statistics. Griffin's Statistical Monographs and Courses. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear Statistical Inference and its Application. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, J. D. (1973). A new, consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giesma staining. Nature 143, 290–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M., Vogel, W. & Krone, W. (1975). Attraction between centric heterochromatin of human chromosomes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 15, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, M. & Krone, W. (1977). On the relationship between the frequency of association and the nuclear constriction of individual acrocentric chromosomes. Human Genetics 23, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffe, H. (1959). The Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Seal, H. L. (1964). Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Biologists. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sele, B., Jalbert, P., Van Cutsem, B., Lucas, M., Moubiquand, C. & Bouchez, R. (1977). Distribution of human chromosomes on the metaphase plate using banding techniques. Human Genetics 39, 39–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, J. P. & Lee, C. L. Y. (1978). Non-random occurrence of 7–14 translocations in human lymphocyte cultures. Nature 255, 241–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, H. (1974). Somatic association of homologous chromosomes in rye. Japanese Journal of Genetics 49, 45–47.Google Scholar
Yunis, J. J., Roldan, L., Yasmineh, W. G. & Lee, J. C. (1971). Staining of repetitive DNA in metaphase chromosomes. Nature 231, 532–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar