Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:59:47.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developmental ‘Noise‘ and a congenital malformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Morton S. Adams  and
Jerry D. Niswander
Morton S. Adams
Affiliation:
Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Maryland 20014
Jerry D. Niswander
Affiliation:
Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Maryland 20014
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Non-directional asymmetry of paired organs is attributed to developmental ‘noise’. The level of asymmetry is inversely correlated to the degree of developmental stability. Children affected with familial cleft lip ± cleft palate have an increased asymmetry of their dermatoglyphics and molar teeth. The action of polygenes with a quasi-continuous distribution is consistent with this observation.

Type
Short Papers
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , December 1967 , pp. 313 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

REFERENCES

Bader, R. S. (1965). Fluctuating asymmetry in the dentition of the house mouse. Growth. 29, 291–300.Google Scholar
Carter, C. O. (1964). Second International Conference on Congenital Malformations: The genetics of common malformations, p. 306. New York: International Medical Congress.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. H. (1960). The simulation of mendelism. Acta genet. Statist. med. 10, 63–70.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, p. 365. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fogh-Anderson, P. (1942). Inheritance of Harelip and Cleft Palate. Copenhagen: A. Busck.Google Scholar
Fraser, F. C. (1955). Thoughts on the etiology of clefts of the palate and lip. Acta genet. Statist. med. 5, 358–369.Google Scholar
Gall, J. C., Stern, A. M., Cohen, M. M., Adams, M. S. & Davidson, R. T. (1966). Holt-Oram syndrome: clinical and genetic study of a large family. Am. J. hum. Genet. 18, 187–200.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1952). Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse. IV. Quasi-continuous variations. J. Genet. 51, 95–114.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. S. & Priest, W. R. (1960). Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. J. dent. Res. 39, 405–414.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. E., Kraus, B. S. & Neptune, C. M. (1965). Dental abnormalities associated with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate J. 2, 22–55.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Neel, J. V. (1958). A study of major congenital defect in Japanese infants. Am. J. hum. Genet. 10, 398–445.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (1954). The distal triradius t on the hands of parents and sibs of mongol imbeciles. Ann. hum. Genet. 19, 10–38.Google Scholar
Silver, W. E. (1966). Dermatoglyphics and cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 3, 368–375.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution. 16, 125–142.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1957). The Strategy of the Genes, p. 139. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1960). Experiments on canalizing selection. Genet. Res. 1, 140–150.Google Scholar
Woolf, C. M., Woolf, R. M. & Broadbent, T. R. (1963). A genetic study of cleft lip and palate in Utah. Am. J. hum. Genet. 15, 209–215.Google Scholar