Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:30:08.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A deterministic model of cyclical selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Rolf F. Hoekstra
Rolf F. Hoekstra
Affiliation:
Biological Centre, Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, Haren (GN), The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A deterministic model of cyclical selection in randomly mating populations is studied. Sufficient conditions for a protected polymorphism, which are for the special case of alternating selection also necessary conditions, are obtained using a simple graphical approach. The most important condition requires ‘marginal overdominance’ (Wallace, 1968); the other conditions seem hard to satisfy in a natural situation. Furthermore it is shown that the cyclical selection model can be regarded as a special case of a frequency-dependent selection model (Cockerham et al. 1972). Using this property, a mean fitness function for the cyclical selection model is derived. Generally, the mean fitness will not be maximized under cyclical selection. The relevance of the model to the problem of the role of cyclical selection in the maintenance of genetic polymorphism in natural populations is discussed. It is concluded that this relevance is probably rather limited with regard to the creation of protected polymorphism, but that the influence of cyclical selection on transient polymorphisms might be more significant. An approximate formula for the time needed for a given change in gene frequency under cyclical selection is derived. It appears that cyclical selection can extend considerably the time during which a transient polymorphism persists, especially if the selective differences in the different environments are of the same order of magnitude and of opposite sign.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Allard, A. W. & Kahler, A. L. (1972). Patterns of molecular variation in plant populations. Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 5, 237–254.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J. (1972). Darwinian versus non-Darwinian evolution in natural populations of Drosophila. Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 5, 211–236.Google Scholar
Bodmer, W. F. & Parsons, P. A. (1960). The initial progress of new genes with various genetic systems. Heredity 15, 283–299.Google Scholar
Cannings, C. (1969). A graphical method for the study of complex genetical systems with special reference to equilibria. Biometrics 25, 747–754.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B. & Giesel, J. T. (1972 a). Selection in populations with overlapping generations. II. Relations between gene frequency and demographic variables. American Naturalist 106, 388–401.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B. & Giesel, J. T. (1972 b). Selection in populations with overlapping generations. IV. Fluctuations in gene frequency with density-dependent selection. American Naturalist 106, 402–411.Google Scholar
Cockerham, C. C., Burrows, P. M., Young, S. S. & Prout, T. (1972). Frequency-dependent selection in randomly mating populations. American Naturalist 106, 493–515.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1943). Genetics of natural populations. IX. Temporal changes in the composition of populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 28, 162–186.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1956). Genetics of natural populations. XXV. Genetic changes in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis in some localities in California. Evolution 10, 82–92.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. & Ayala, F. J. (1973). Temporal frequency changes of enzyme and chromosomal polymorphisms in natural populations of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 70, 680–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubinin, N. P. & Tiniakov, G. G. (1945). Seasonal cycles and the concentration of inversions in populations of Drosophila funebris. American Naturalist 79, 560–572.Google Scholar
Falk, C. (1966). A new way of looking at the stability of a simple genetic equilibrium. IIIrd International Congress on Human Genetics (Chicago). Abstr. p. 31.Google Scholar
Franklin, I. & Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics 65, 707–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaines, M. S. & Krebs, C. J. (1971). Genetic changes in fluctuating vole populations. Evolution 25, 702–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershenson, S. (1945). Evolutionary studies on the distribution and dynamics of melanism in the hamster (Gricetus cricetus L.). Genetics 30, 207–251.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J. H. (1973). Natural selection with varying selection coefficients – a haploid model. Genetical Research 21, 115–120.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. & Jayakar, S. D. (1963). Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. Journal of Genetics 58, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H., Hopkinson, D. A. & Luffman, J. L. (1968). Enzyme diversity in human populations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 151, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1954). Processes leading to quasi-fixation of genes in natural populations due to random fluctuations in selection intensities. Genetics 39, 280–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1968). Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles. Genetical Research 11, 247–269.Google Scholar
King, J. L. & Jukes, T. H. (1969). Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164, 788–798.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. & Hubby, J. L. (1966). A molecular approach to the study of genie heterozy-gosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. C. (1967). Genetic equilibrium under selection. Biometrics 23, 397–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukai, T., Mettler, L. E. & Chigusa, S. I. (1971). Linkage disequilibrium in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 68, 1065–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, T. (1972). Fixation probability of a mutant influenced by random fluctuation of selection intensity. Genetical Research 19, 33–38.Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Lewontin, R. C. & Hubby, J. L. (1969). A molecular approach to the study of genetic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 61, 841–858.Google Scholar
Prout, T. (1968). Sufficient conditions for multiple niche polymorphism. American Naturalist 102, 493–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K. & Yang, S. Y. (1969). Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity in a wild population of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Genetics 63, 653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semeonoff, R. & Robertson, F. W. (1968). A biochemical and ecological study of plasma esterase polymorphism in natural populations in the field vole, Microtus agrestis L. Biochemical Genetics 1, 205–227.Google Scholar
Tamarin, R. H. & Krebs, C. J. (1969). Microtus population biology. II. Genetic changes at the transferrin locus in fluctuating populations of two vole species. Evolution 23, 183–211.Google Scholar
Timoféeff-Ressovsky, N. W. (1940). Zur Analyse des Polymorphismus bei Adalia bipunctata. Biologisches Zentralblatt 60, 130–137.Google Scholar
Wallace, B. (1968). Topics in Population Genetics, p. 213. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Wills, C. (1973). In defense of naïve pan-selectionism. American Naturalist 107, 23–34.Google Scholar