Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:40:12.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consequences of double cross-over detections on the functional interpretation of segment ‘29’ in Podospora anserina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

B. Touré  and
M. Picard
B. Touré
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de génétique, Université Paris XI, Centre d'Orsay – 91 et L.A. n° 86 au C.N.R.S.
M. Picard
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de génétique, Université Paris XI, Centre d'Orsay – 91 et L.A. n° 86 au C.N.R.S.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Double cross-overs were detected in a few crosses involving segment ‘29’ mutants of locus ‘14’ in Podospora anserina. The occurrence of such recombination events made it necessary to reconsider the localization of three mutants. Use of an outside marker and the analysis of many other crosses allowed these mutants to be mapped unambiguously. The change in the localization of one of these mutants together with complementation tests on a new mutant leads to the conclusion that the polycistronic unit of transcription contains only four cistrons instead of the five previously thought to exist.

Type
Short Paper
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , June 1972 , pp. 313 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Bauerle, R. H. & Margolin, P. (1966). A multifunctional enzyme complex in the tryptophan pathway of Salmonella typhimurium: comparison of polarity and pseudopolarity mutations. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 31, 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, N. E. & Giles, N. H. (1960). Comparative complementation and genetic maps of the pan-2 locus in Neurospora crassa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 46, 659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esser, K. (1969). An introduction to Podospora anserina. Neurospora Newsletter 15, 27.Google Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S. (1967). Recombination within the am gene of Neurospora crassa. Genetical Research 9, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S. & Stadler, D. R. (1965). Complementation relationships of Neurospora am mutants in relation to their formation of abnormal varieties of glutamate dehydrogenase. Genetical Research 6, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcou, D. & Picard, M. (1967). Sur l'intérêt du Podospora anserina pour l'étude des problèmes de la recombinaison. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 264, 759.Google Scholar
Picard, M. (1971). Genetic evidence for a polycistronic unit of transcription in the complex locus ‘14’ in Podospora anserina I. Genetic and complementation maps. Molecular and General Genetics 111, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, M. J., Torriani, A. & Levinthal, C. (1963). In vitro formation of enzymatically active hybrid proteins from E. coli alkaline phosphatase CRM's. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 28, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, B., Rytka, J. & Kink, G. R. (1969). Nonsense mutations affecting the his-4 enzyme complex of Yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 63, 1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toure, B. & Marcou, D. (1970). Nature, dimension et limites des événements de recombinaison génétique à l'intérieur d'une unité de transcription polycistronique chez le Podospora anserina. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 270, 619.Google Scholar
Ullmann, A., Jacob, F. & Monod, J. (1968). On the subunit structure of wild type versus complemented β-galactosidase of Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Biology, 32, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1967). Secondary crossing-over. Nature 215, 1352–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed