Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:04:38.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combining superior alleles from two homozygous populations in a cross-fertilizing species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Y. T. Ho  and
R. E. Comstock
Y. T. Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, U.S.A.
R. E. Comstock
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The issue of incorporating the good alleles from two homozygous populations of a cross-fertilizing species into a single improved population was investigated assuming independent assortment, no epistasis, and either complete dominance (of the favourable or the unfavourable alleles) or additive genes. The selection limit in the foundation stock is a function of the effective population size (N), the proportion (x) contributed by the better source population (P1), the difference in relative fitness between single locus homozygotes and the proportion of loci (that will segregate in the foundation stock) fixed favourably in P1. In real life the last two of these are never known. We therefore focused on the response limits given x = 0·5, 0·75, 0·875 or the optimum value of x (which is a function of the other three parameters). Our general finding was that in situations where N is large enough so that a major portion of the potential can be achieved, the F2 population should be used as the foundation stock when the two source populations do not differ greatly in performance; but when one population performs considerably better than the other, the first backcross (but not second backcross) would be the choice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 277 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Carr, R. N. & Nassar, R. F. (1970). Effects of selection and drift on the dynamics of finite populations. I. Ultimate probability of fixation of a favourable allele. Biometrics 26, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comstock, R. E. (1974). Consequences of genetic linkage. Proceedings, 1st World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production, pp. 353–364.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E. (1978). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Proc. International Maize Symposium, Genetics and Breeding (ed. Walden, David B.), pp. 191–206. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An introduction to population genetics theory. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: The Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1971). Improvement of litter size in a strain of mice at a selection limit. Genetical Research 17, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, J. R. (1975). Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188, 618–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1966). Effects of linkage on the limits to artificial selection. Genetical Research 8, 269–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, Yui Tim (1973). Genetic improvement by combining superior alleles from different populations in a naturally cross-fertilizing species. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1957). Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28, 882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, I. M. & Donald, H. P. (1966). Modern developments in animal breeding. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Osman, H. E. S. & Robertson, A. (1968). The introduction of genetic material from inferior into superior strains. Genetical Research 12, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. C. (1967). The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. IV. Sources of new genetic variance - irradiation and outcrossing. Genetical Research 9, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 153, 234–249.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1970). A theory of limits in artificial selection with many linked loci. In Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K.), pp. 246–288. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar