Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:30:47.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cell number in relation to heterosis during embryonic growth of mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

H. Krzanowska
H. Krzanowska
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Genetics, Jagiellonian University, Krupnicza 50, Kraków, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Body and liver weight and the number of nuclei in the liver were significantly higher in F1 hybrid than in inbred embryos developing in the same uterus after artificial heterospermic insemination. The size of 13-day-old F1 hybrids corresponds to the size of 13·4-day in bred embryos. No significant differences in cell size were found between F1 hybrid and inbred embryos of the same age. It is concluded that in 13–15-day embryos heterosis takes place through increase in cell number and not cell size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , December 1967 , pp. 235 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

REFERENCES

Dvořák, M. (1963). A contribution to the karyometry of the liver cells in the embryonal and early postnatal period. Spisy lék. Fak. Masaryk Univ. 36, 149–159.Google Scholar
Dziuk, P. J. & Runner, M. N. (1960). Recovery of blastocysts and induction of implantation following artificial insemination. J. Reprod. Fert. 1, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krzanowska, H. (1960). Studies on heterosis. II. Fertilization rate in inbred lines of mice and their crosses. Folia biol., Kraków. 8, 269–279.Google Scholar
Krzanowska, H. (1964). Time interval between copulation and fertilization in inbred lines of mice and their crosses. Folia biol., Kraków. 12, 231–244.Google Scholar
Krzanowska, H. (1965). New inbred strains of mice. Mouse News Lett. 32, 54–56.Google Scholar
Musiałek, B. (1966). An analysis of body weight of newborn mice from inbred strains and their crosses in homo- and heterospermic litters. Acta biol. cracov. Ser. Zool. 9, 33–45.Google Scholar
Musiałek, B. (1967). Influence of genotype and environment on body weight in two strains of mice and F1 hybrids. Genet. pol. (in the press).Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1958). Cell size and number in relation to heterosis and size variation in Drosophila. Proc. X. Int. Congr. Genet. Montreal. 2, 238–239.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W. (1960). Studies in quantitative inheritance. XII. Cell size and number in relation to genetic and environmental variation of body size in Drosophila. Genetics. 44, 869–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. B. (1957). Increase of deoxyribonucleic acid and cell number during morphogenesis of the early chick embryo. Biochim. biophys. Acta, 23, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winick, M. & Noble, A. (1965). Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the rat. Devl. Biol. 12, 451–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed