Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T07:17:58.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural pleiotropy of the yellow gene in Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

R. Wilson ,
B. Burnet ,
L. Eastwood  and
K. Connolly
R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England
B. Burnet
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England
L. Eastwood
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England
K. Connolly
Affiliation:
Departments of Genetics and Psychology, University of Sheffield, England

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The yellow mutant (y − 1:0·0) of Drosophila melanogaster shows a reduction in body pigmentation associated with a decrement in locomotor activity and in male competitive mating ability. The effects of the mutant gene are specific to locomotor activity in the adult fly, measures of larval activity being unaffected. In the presence of active females yellow males offer a reduced intensity of sexual stimulation because they are less able to maintain contact during courtship. However, the impaired locomotor performance of yellow males is not the general cause for their reduced competitive mating ability, since the stimuli provided by yellow mutants courting inactive females appear to be both quantitatively and qualitatively indistinguishable from those of their wild-type male sibs. Nor is there any good evidence, as measured by the frequency of rejection responses, that the courtship stimulation offered by the yellow males is less acceptable to the females. The mutant males are nevertheless unsuccessful in achieving copulation with such females. It is suggested that impairment of mating ability in yellow males may be caused by changes in the efficiency for mating of their secondary sexual structures due to the effect of the yellow gene on the properties of the cuticle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , August 1976 , pp. 75 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Bastock, M. (1956). A gene mutation which changes a behaviour pattern. Evolution. 10, 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet-Clark, H. C. (1975). Acoustics and the behaviour of Drosophilia. Verhandlungen der Deutschen zoologischen Gesellschaft, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Ewing, A. W. (1969). Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 17, 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet-Clark, H. C., Ewing, A. W. & Manning, A. (1973). The persistence of courtship stimulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Behavioral Biology 8, 763–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, B., & Connolly, K. (1974). Activity and sexual behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. In The Genetics of Behaviour (ed. van Abeelen, J. H. F.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Burnet, B., Connolly, K. & Dennis, L. (1971). The function and processing of auditory information in the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 19, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, B., Connolly, K. & Harrison, B. (1973). Phenocopies of pigmentary and behavioral effects of the yellow mutant in Drosophila induced by α-dimethyltyrosine. Science 181, 1059–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, B., Connolly, K. & Mallinson, M. (1974). Activity and sexual behavior of neurological mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Behavior Genetics 4, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, B., Eastwood, L. & Connolly, K. (1976). The courtship song of male Drosophila lacking aristae. Animal Behaviour (in the Press).Google Scholar
Connolly, K. (1967). Locomotor activity in Drosophila. III. A distinction between activity and reactivity. Animal Behaviour 15, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, K., Burnet, B., Kearney, M. & Eastwood, L. (1974). Mating speed and courtship behaviour of inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 48, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, K. & Cook, R. (1973). Rejection responses by female Drosophila melanogaster: their ontogeny, causality and effects upon the behaviour of the courting male. Behaviour 44, 142–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. (1975). Courtship of Drosophila melanogaster: rejection without extrusion. Behaviour 52, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. & Holz, A. M. (1943). A re-examination of the problem of manifold effects of genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 28, 295–303.Google Scholar
Kalmus, H. (1941). The resistance to desiccation of Drosophila mutants affecting body colour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 130, 185–201.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institution of Washington no. 627.Google Scholar
Nash, W. G. & Yarkin, R. J. (1974). Genetic regulation and pattern formation: A study of the yellow locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 24, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Schilcher, F. (1976). The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 24, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, D., Burnet, B. & Connolly, K. (1975). Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 24, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H. (1915). Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila. Journal of Animal Behaviour 5, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Threlkeld, S. F. H., Procwat, R. A., Abbott, K. S. & Yeung, A. D. (1974). Genetically based behaviour patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 247, 232–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed