Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:38:45.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additive variance and average effect with partial selfing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. J. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8203, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The covariance of an ancestor and the average of its descendants in generation t(CPt) is formulated for a breeding system which is a mixture of selfing and outcrossing. This covariance is partitioned into least squares additive (σA. At) and non-additive (σD. Dt) components summed over individual loci, and the combined inbreeding effects of all loci (H′), such that CPt = σA. At + (s/2)tD. Do + H′]. For the mth locus the covariance mσA. At = 2(1 + Fipiα(0)iα(t)i, in which pi is the frequency of the ith allele whose additive effect (α(t)) depends on the generation for which it is defined. For distant descendants α(∞) is equal to half of the derivative of the population mean with respect to the frequency of the allele. The covariance CP = σA. A thus relates directly to permanent selection response measured in the equilibrium population, any additional responses observed in earlier generations being due to temporary disturbances in population genotypic structure. It is only for these distant descendants that the least squares additive component has any direct interpretation in terms of selection response. The definitions of α(0) and α(∞), lead to two distinct definitions of the average effect of an allele substitution for a model with two alleles (Fisher, 1941), and to a clarification of their significance for this breeding system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Cockerham, C. C. & Weir, B. S. (1984). Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics 40, 157164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, D. S. (1986). A note on Fisher's ‘average effect’ and ‘average excess’. Genetical Research, Cambridge 46, 337347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1941). Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11, 5363.Google Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. (1977). Two locus theory in quantitative genetics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics.Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Wright, A. J. & Cockerham, C. C. (1985). Selection with partial selfing. I. Mass selection. Genetics 109, 585597.Google Scholar
Wright, A. J. & Cockerham, C. C. (1986). Selection with partial selfing. II. Family selection. Crop Science 26, 261268.Google Scholar