Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:35:32.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrient supply and dry-matter partitioning of pineapple cv. Josapine on sandy tin tailings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2004

Mohamed Musa Hanafi  and
Ahmad Halimah
Mohamed Musa Hanafi
Affiliation:
Department of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Ahmad Halimah
Affiliation:
Department of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Their physical and chemical properties make sandy tin tailings unsuitable for agricultural purposes without proper fertilizer and crop management practices. An attempt was made to use these tailings for sustainable production of pineapple using fertilization and irrigation techniques. Therefore, the objective of the study was to determine the effect of ground sucker size and levels of fertilizer used on yield and nutrient accumulation in plant components of pineapple cv. Josapine grown on sandy tin tailings. Materials and methods. Three fertilizer levels (plot 1, plot 2 and plot 3) containing N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Cu in solution and three classes of ground suckers (> 70 cm, 70–40 cm and < 70 cm) were used. They were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. There were 32 plants in each experimental plot. Each plot received a similar quantity of Fe, B, Mn, Zn and Mo. At harvest, each plant’s parts were divided into fruit, leaves, stem and roots. The dry matter yield and nutrient contents of each pineapple part were analyzed and recorded. Results and discussion. The highest and the lowest amounts of dry matter were 397 g·plant–1 (size > 70 cm) and 96 g·plant–1 (size < 70 cm), respectively. Total dry matter accumulation was greater (26%) for plot 1 than for plots 2 and 3. Substantial amounts of the dry matter accumulation occurred in leaves (45.0%) and fruit (34.0%) and less in stems (16.0%) and roots (5%). A similar pattern was also observed for the total (major and micro-) nutrient accumulation in the plant components. Besides the fruit parameters, the length of the pineapple stem is an important factor affecting the yield of pineapple, either expressed on a fresh (R2 = 0.904***) or dry (R2 = 0.855***) weight basis. Conclusion. Ground sucker size is a very important factor for successful production of a high fruit yield and quality of pineapple planted on sandy tin tailings.

Keywords

MalaysiaAnanas comosuslithological soil typesfertigationratoonsyieldsMalaisieAnanas comosustype de sol lithologiqueirrigation fertilisanterejet de soucherendement
Type
Research Article
Information
Fruits , Volume 59 , Issue 5 , September 2004 , pp. 359 - 366
Copyright
© CIRAD, EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan Y.K., Recent advancements in hybridization and selection of pineapple in Malaysia, in: Bartholomew P.D., Rohrbach K.G. (Eds.), Proc. 1st international pineapple symposium, November 2–6, 1992, ISHS, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 1993, pp. 33–34.
Anon., Statistics on commodities, Ministry of Primary Industries: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1997, pp. 113–118.
Bremner J.M., Total nitrogen, in: Black C.A. (Ed.), Method of soil analysis, part 2, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI, USA, 1960, pp. 1149–1176.
Bray, R.H., Kurtz, L.T., Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils, Soil Sci. 59 (1945) 39–45. CrossRef
Cottenie A., Verloo M., Velghe G., Kiekens L., Analytical method for plants and soils, Laboratory of analytical and agrochemistry, State Univ. Ghent, Belgium, 1979.
Walkley, A., Black, I.A., An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method, Soil Sci. 37 (1934) 29–38. CrossRef
Piper C.S., Soil and plant analysis, Hassal Press, Adelaide, Australia, 1947, pp. 192–196.
Hanafi M.M., Razzaque A.H.M., Nutrient optimization for pineapple grown on tropical peat soil, in: van Vuuren J., Barnard R.O. (Eds.), 8th Int. Symp. Soil Plant Anal., Challenges for sustainable development: The role of soil, plant, and water analysis, January, 13–17, 2003, Somerset West, Cape Town, South Africa, 2003, p. 60.
Thomas, G.W., Sheard, R.W., Moyer, J.R., Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion, Agron. J. 59 (1957) 240–243. CrossRef
Anon., SAS for linear model: a guide to the ANOVA and GLM procedures, SAS Institute, Carey, NC, USA, 1989.
Snyder, F.W., Carlson, G.E., Selecting for partitioning of photosynthetic products in crops, Adv. Agron. 37 (1984) 47–72. CrossRef
Hepton A., Ingamells J.L., Macion E., Gonzales J., Sampongse D., Pineapple plant and fruit growth and development in fertilized native soil and artificial rooting medium, in: Bartholomew P.D., Rohrbach K.G. (Eds.), Proc. 1st Int. Pineapple Symp., November 2–6, 1992, ISHS, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 1993, pp. 131–138.