Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:49:41.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Karyotypic study of wild pear species of Fars Province, Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Javad Zamani
Affiliation:
Azad Eslami Univ., Jahrom branch, Jahrom, Iran
Mehrnaz Riasat
Affiliation:
Res. Cent. Agric. Nat. Res. Fars Province, PO Box 71555–617, Shiraz, Iran
Yousef Ali Saadat
Affiliation:
Res. Cent. Agric. Nat. Res. Fars Province, PO Box 71555–617, Shiraz, Iran
Ahmad Hatami
Affiliation:
Res. Cent. Agric. Nat. Res. Fars Province, PO Box 71555–617, Shiraz, Iran
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Iran, with more than 10 species of Pyrus, is one of the important genetic resources for this genus in the world, and Fars province is one of the centers of origin. In our research, cytogenetical investigation of native wild pear species of Fars province, including P. glabra Boiss., P. syriaca Boiss. and, probably, a natural hybrid of them, (P. glabra × P  syriaca), was carried out using a video analysis system. Materials and methods. Seed germination of different species was done on damp filter paper in petri dishes, and root tips were collected for karyotypical investigation. After pretreatment, fixation, hydrolysis and staining, samples were prepared for observation under the microscope and chromosome morphology was studied. Analysis of the species genome (length of each chromosome, length of long and short arm, ratio of long arm to short arm and ratio of short arm to long arm) was done and the chromosomal type of each species was determined using Levan et al.'s method. Then the karyotypic symmetry of species was studied by Stebbins' method. Results and discussion. The results revealed that all of the genotypes, with 2n = 2x = 34, were diploid. Based on Stebbins' table, genotypes 1 and 2 of P. glabra were classified into group 1A, P. glabra × P. syriaca into group 2A and P. syriaca into group 2B. Genotype plots, according to the A1 and A2 parameters and Stebbins' cross classes, revealed the same results. Similarity and differences of species in chromosomal aspects were investigated and the results shown in a dendrogram.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© CIRAD, EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Challice, J.S., Westwood, M.N., Numerical taxonomic studies of the genus Pyrus using both chemical and botanical characters, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 67 (1973) 121148. CrossRef
Schonbeck–Temesy E., Rosaceae, in: Rechinger K.H. (Ed.), Flora Iranica, Vol. 66, Akad. Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt. Graz. Austria.,1975, pp. 27–35.
Khatamsaz M., Flora of Iran, No. 6: Rosaceae, Res. Inst. For. Rangel., Tehran, Iran, 1993, 352 p.
Darlington C.D., Wylie A.P., Chromosome atlas of flowering plants, George Allen G. Unwin Ltd., London, UK, 1976, 519 p.
Shenghua, L., Chenequan, F., Studies on chromosome of Pyrus in China, Acta Hortic. 367 (1994) 2732. CrossRef
Pu F., Huang L., Sun B., Li S., A study on the chromosome number of wild and cultivated pears (Pyrus sp.) in China, Acta Hortic. Sin. 12 (1985) 155–158
Löve A., Löve D., Plant chromosomes, in: Cramer J., A. R. Ganter Verlag Kommanditgesellschaft, Vaduz, Liecht., 1975.
Stebbins G.L., Chromosomal evolution in higher plants, Edward Arnold Publ. Ltd., London, UK, 1971.
Romero Zarco, C., A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry, Taxon. 36 (1986) 526530.
Huziwara Y., Karyotype analysis in some genera of compositeae. V. Further studies on the chromosome of Aster, Am. J. Bot. 49 (1962) 116–119.
Levan, A.K., Fredga, K., Sandberg, A.A., Nomenclature for centromic position on chromosomes, Hered. 52 (1964) 201220. CrossRef
Anon., JMP, Version 3.1, SAS Inst. Inc, SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina, USA, 1995.
Anon., SAS/STAT User’s guide, Release 6.03, SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA, 1988.
Hummel, R.L., Evaluation of hybrid Pyrus selection, Landsc. Plant Newsl. 14 (2003) 711.
Quentin, B., Zielinski, Q.B., Thompson, M.M., Speciation in Pyrus: Chromosome number and mitotic behavior, Bot. Gaz. 128 (2) (1967) 109112.