Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:57:59.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of risks and potential of injectiontechniques in integrated programs to eradicate the red palm weevil:review and new perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2014

Michel Ferry  and
Susi Gomez
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Plants develop mechanisms that allow them to compartmentalize injuries that they suffer during their life. In trees, pruning and injection treatments must be used in accordance with precise rules to reduce risks resulting from the injuries created. Sealing in palms. Palms, contrary to widespread belief, are quite capable of “healing” injuries (sealing); because of an anatomy quite different from trees, the sealing process in palms is much simpler. Compartmentalization of injection wounds. The controversy on the use of injection in trees is due essentially to initial mistakes that have then been rectified. Injection in palms against the red palm weevil. For palms, for decades, this technique has been employed without problems and with great efficiency against various pests, including Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, the red palm weevil (RPW). Its use has been reserved for exceptional situations either to face abnormal pest proliferation, uncontrollable by other techniques, or to implement eradication programs. Integrated eradication program. In such a program, the main aim of injection treatments is preventive. With long-persistence insecticides, the number of treatments could be greatly reduced. The resulting savings in time and money would enable the organization of the treatments of all the palms located in an infested area, and consequently the rapid eradication of the pest. New perspectives. We established that insecticides applied by injection were capable of protecting palms with only two or even one treatment per year. These results suggest a radical improvement in programs to eradicate RPW, while considerably reducing the risks to health and the environment compared with spray treatments.

Keywords

SpainArecaceaeplant anatomyintegrated pest managementRhynchophorus ferrugineusinvasive speciestree injectioninsecticideslesionshealingpesticide persistencechemoprophylaxispest eradicationEspagneArecaceaeanatomie végétalegestion intégrée des ravageursRhynchophorus ferrugineusespèce envahissanteinjection d'arbresinsecticidelésionguérisonpersistance des pesticideschimiopréventionéradication des parasitesEspañaArecaceaeanatomía de la plantagestión de lucha integradaRhynchophorus ferrugineusespecie invasivainyección en el árbolinsecticidaslesionescuraciónpersistencia de los plaguicidasprofilaxis químicaerradicación de plagas
Type
Review
Information
Fruits , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 143 - 157
Copyright
© 2014 Cirad/EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Perry, T.O., Santamour, F.S., Stipes, R.J., Shear, T.H., Shigo, A.L., Exploring alternatives to tree injection, J. Arboric. 17 (8) (1991) 217–226.Google Scholar
Lipetz, I., Wound healing in higher plants, Int. Rev. Cytol. 27 (1970) 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo, A.L., Hillis, W.E., Heartwood, discolored wood, and microorganisms in living trees, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 11 (1973) 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo A.L., Marx H.G., Compartmentalization of decay in trees, U.S. Dep. Agric., Inf. Bull. 405 (1977) 73 p.
Garrett, P.W., Shigo, A.L., Selecting trees for their response to wounding, Metrop. Tree Improv. Alliance (Metria) Proc. 1 (1978) 69–72.Google Scholar
Shigo, A.L., Shortle, W.C., Compartmentalization of discolored wood in heartwood of red oak, Phytopathology 69 (1979) 710–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo, A.L., Compartmentalization: a conceptual framework for understanding how trees grow and defend themselves, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 22 (1984) 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, D., Tree wounds and wound closure, J. Arboric. 5 (1979) 135–140.Google Scholar
Armstrong, I.E., Shigo, A.L., Funk, D.T., McGinnes, E.A., Smith, D.E., A macroscopic and microscopic study of compartmentalization and wound closure after mechanical wounding of black walnut, Wood Fiber Sci. 13 (4) (1981) 275–291.Google Scholar
Neely, D., Tree wound closure, J. Arboric. 14 (1988) 148–152.Google Scholar
Biggs, A.R., Managing wound-associated diseases by understanding wound healing in the bark of woody plants, Arboric. 16 (1990) 108–112.Google Scholar
Biggs A.R., Anatomical and physiological responses of bark tissues to mechanical injury, in: Blanchette R.A., Biggs A.R. (Eds.), Defense mechanisms of woody plants against fungi, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Ger., 1992, 13–40.
Schmitt, U., Liese, W., Wound tyloses in Robinia pseudoacacia L., IAWA J. 15 (2) (1994) 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guariguata, M.R., Gilbert, G.S., Interspecific variation in rates of trunk wound closure in a Panamanian lowland forest, Biotropica 28 (1) (1996) 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, R., Decay development and its restriction in trees, J. Arboric. 26 (2000) 1–11.Google Scholar
Smith, K.T., Compartmentalization today, Arboric. J. 29 (2006) 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo, A.L., Successions of microorganisms and patterns of discoloration and decay after wounding in red oak and white oak, Phytopathology 62 (1972) 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo A.L., Trees anatomy, Shigo and Trees Assoc., Durham, N.H., U.S.A., 1994, 104 p.
Santamour, F.S., Wound compartmentalization potential and borer damage in green ash, J. Arboric. 13 (5) (1987) 131–134.Google Scholar
Bostock, R.M., Stermer, B.A., Perspectives on wound healing in resistance to pathogens, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27 (1989) 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dute, R.D., Miller, M.E., Davis, M.A., Woods, F.M., McLean, K.S., Effects of Ambrosia beetle attack on Cercis Canadensis, IAWA J. 23 (2) (2002) 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith K.T., Shortle W.E., Patterns of storm injury and tree response, U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., NA-TP-02-01, U.S.A., 2001.
Smith, K.T., Sutherland, E., Fire scar formation and compartmentalization in oak, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, D., Closure of branch pruning wounds with conventional and ‘Shigo’ cuts, J. Arboricult. 14 (1988) 261–264.Google Scholar
Eisner, N.J., Gilman, E.F., Grabosky, J.C., Branch morphology impacts compartmentalization of pruning wounds, Arboric. Urban For. 28 (2) (2002) 99–105.Google Scholar
O’Hara, K., Pruning wounds and occlusion: A long-standing conundrum in forestry, J. For. 105 (2007) 131–138.Google Scholar
Clark L.R., Matheny N., What does research tell us about the practice of pruning in arboriculture, Arboric. News (2010) 41–44.
Morselli M.F., Effects of the use of para formaldehyde (PFA) sterilising pellets on sugar maple health: A review, in: XXth World Cong., IUFRO, Tampere, Finland, 1995.
Dutcher, J.D., Worley, R.E., Littrell, R.H., Trunk injection of dicrotophos and trunk implantation of acephate to control foliar pecan pests, J. Arboric. 6 (1980) 294–297.Google Scholar
Dujesiefken, D., Rhaesa, A., Eckstein, D., Stobbe, H., Tree wound reactions of differently treated boreholes, J. Arboric. 25 (1999) 113–123.Google Scholar
Ferracini, C., Alma, A., How to preserve horse chestnut trees from Cameraria ohridella in the urban environment, Crop Prot. 27 (9) (2000) 1251–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doccola J., Wild P., Bristol E., Lojko J., Differential wound response for deciduous hardwood trees using arboplug technology, Arbojet, Winchester, M.A., U.S.A., 2004, 22 p.
Dujesiefken, D., Liese, W., Shortle, W., Minocha, R., Response of beech and oak to wounds, Eur. J. For. Res. 124 (2005) 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.T., Tree biology and problem trees, Arboric. News 14 (2) (2005) 24–26.Google Scholar
[35] Shigo A.L., How trees survive after injury and infection, in: Wilson C.L., Scorza R. (Eds.), Proc. stone fruit tree decline workshop, Appalachian fruit research station, Kearneysville, W.V., U.S.A., 1985, 133–138..
Bonsen, K.J., Kucera, L.J., Vessel occlusions in plants: morphological, functional and evolutionary aspects, IAWA Bull. 11 (1990) 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, C., Bolker, B.M., Effects of stem anatomical and structural traits on responses to stem damage: an experimental study in the Bolivian Amazon, Can. J. For. Res. 38 (2008) 611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, C., Bolker, B.M., Edwards, C.E., Stem responses to damage: the evolutionary ecology of Quercus species in contrasting fire regimes, New Phytol. 182 (1) (2009) 261–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shigo, A.L., Successions of organisms in discoloration and decay of wood, For. Res. 2 (1967) 237–299.Google Scholar
Shigo, A.L., Campana, R., Discolored and decayed wood associated with injection wounds in American elm, J. Arboric. 3 (1977) 230–235.Google Scholar
Costonis, A.C., The wounding effects of Mauget and creative sales injections, J. Arboric. 6 (1980) 204–208.Google Scholar
Shigo, A.L., Targets for proper tree care, J. Arboric. 9 (11) (1983) 285–294.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.L., Campana, R.J., Shigo, A.L., Shortle, W.C., Wound response of Ulmus americana, 1: Results of chemical injection in attempts to control Dutch elm disease, J. Arboric. 11 (5) (1985) 137–142.Google Scholar
Smith, K.T., Wounding, compartmentalization, and treatment tradeoffs, J. Arboric. 14 (1988) 226–229.Google Scholar
Smith K.T., Lewis P.A., Potential concerns for tree wound response from stem injection, in: Onken B., Reardon R. (Compil.), Proc. Third Hemlock Wooly Adelgid Conf., Asheville, NC, Feb. 1–3, 2005, USDA For. Serv. Publ., U.S.A., 2005.
Deleuze J., Palmiers pour le climat méditerranéen, Ed. Champlour, Marly-le-Roi, France, 1995, 144 p.
Howard F.W., Moore D., Giblin-Davis R.M., Abad R.G., Insect pests of palms and their control, CAB Int., Oxon, N.Y., U.K., 2001, 400 p.
Del Cañizo J.A., Palmeras, Ed. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, España, 2002, 704 p.
Moya B., Plumed J., Littardi C., La poda de las palmeras ornamentales, AEA, Valencia, España, 2005, 266 p.
Shigo A.L., 100 tree myths, Shigo and Trees Assoc., Durham, N.H., U.S.A., 1993, 80 p.
Bloch, R., Wound healing and necrosis in air roots of Phoenix Reclinata and leaves of Araucaria imbricata, Am. J. Bot. 24 (1937) 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J.B., Control of growth and development in the monocotyledons – new areas of experimental research (A), Q. Rev. Biol. 48 (2) (1973) 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo A.L., Trees anatomy, Shigo and Trees Assoc., urham, N.H., U.S.A., 1993, 104 p.
Weiner, G., Liese, W., Wound response in the stem of the Royal palm, IAWA J. 16 (4) (1995) 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball L., Palms not just for the tropics, Arboric. News (2005) 13–16.
Broschat T.K., Elliott M.L., Normal abnormalities in palm, Univ. Fla. Ext. Serv., Gainesville, U.S.A., 2007, 7 p.
Aloni, R., Plotkin, T., Wound induced and naturally occurring regenerative differentiation of xylem in Zea mays, Planta 163 (1985) 126–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rittinger, P., Biggs, A., Peirson, D., Histochemistry of lignin and suberin deposition in boundary layers formed after wounding in various plant species and organs, Can. J. Bot. 65 (1987) 1886–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stipes, R.J., Glitches and gaps in the science and technology of tree injection, J. Arboric. 14 (1988) 165–172.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Zamora, M.A., Fernandez-Escobar, R., Injector-size and the time of application affects uptake of tree trunk-injected solutions, Sci. Hortic. 84 (1–2) (2000) 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Zamora, M.A., Fernandez-Escobar, R., Uptake and distribution of trunk injections in conifers, J. Arboric. 30 (2) (2004) 73–79.Google Scholar
Cowles R.S., Cheah C.S., Montgomery M.E., Comparing systemic imidacloprid application methods for controlling hemlock woolly adelgid, in: Onken B., Reardon R. (Compil.), Third Symp. Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern United States, Asheville, NC, Feb. 1–3, 2005, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, W.V., U.S.A., 2005, 169–172.
Harrell, M., Imidacloprid concentrations in green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) following treatments with two trunk-injection methods, Arboric. Urban For. 32 (3) (2006) 126–129.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M., Haack, R.A., Petrice, T.R, Miller, D.L., Bauer, L.S., Gao, R., Field evaluations of systemic insecticides for control of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in China, J. Econ. Entomol. 99 (2) (2006) 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doccola, J.J., Bristol, E.J., Sifieet, S.D., Lojko, L., Wild, P.M., Efficacy of trunk-injected imidacloprid in the management of hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae), Arboric. Urban For. 33 (1) (2007) 12–21.Google Scholar
Ferry, M., Gómez, S., Une nouvelle stratégie contre le charançon rouge des palmiers, Phytoma 620 (2008) 24–28.Google Scholar
Ferry, M., Gómez, S., Charançon rouge des palmiers, mises au point sur la lutte, Phytoma 658 (2012) 38–41.Google Scholar
Xu, T., Jacobsen, C.M., Hara, A.H, Lia, Ji, Lie, Q.X., Efficacy of systemic insecticides on the gall wasp Quadrastichus erythrinae in wiliwili trees (Erythrina spp.), Pest Manag. Sci. 2009 (65) (2008) 163–169.Google Scholar
Cowles R.S., Lagalante A.F., Activity and persistence of systemic insecticides for managing hemlock woolly adelgids, in: 20th USDA Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species, Annapolis, MD, U.S.A., 2009.
Doccola, J.J., Smith, S.L., Strom, R.L., Medeiros, A.C., Von Allmen, E., Systemically applied insecticides for treatment of erythrina gall wasp, Quadrastichus erythrinae Kim, Arbor. Urban For. 35 (4) (2009) 173–181.Google Scholar
Herms D.A., McCullough D.G., Smitley D.R, Sadof C.S., Williamson R.C., Nixon P.L., Insecticide options for protecting ash trees from emerald ash borer, North Central IPM Center bulletin (2009) 12 p.
Mota-Sanchez, D., Cregg, B.M., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., Hollingworth, R.M., Distribution of trunk-injected 14C-imidacloprid in ash trees and effects on emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) adults, Crop Prot. 28 (2009) 655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diling, C., Lambdin, P., Grant, J., Rhea, R., Spatial and temporal distribution of imidacloprid in Eastern Hemlock in the Southern Appalachians, J. Econ. Entomol. 103 (2) (2010) 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinon J., Aux ormes citoyens, Courr. Cell. Environ. 8 (1989).
Pinon, J., Feugey, L., La graphiose de l’orme: une maladie dévastatrice aux causes bien identifiées, Rev. For. Fr. XLVI – 5 (1994) 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen L., How to identify and manage Dutch elm disease, USDA, NA-PR-07-98, 1998.
Paulsrud, B., Fungicide injections will they prevent Dutch elm disease? Home Yard Garden Pest Newsl. 26 (2000) 5–6.Google Scholar
Faccoli, M., Elm bark beetles and Dutch elm disease: tests of combined control, J. Pest Sci. 74 (2001) 22–29.Google Scholar
Lanier G., Therapy for Dutch elm disease, J. Arboric. 14 9 (1988).
Haugen, L., Stennes, M., Fungicide injection to control Dutch elm disease understanding the options, Plant Diagn. Q. 20 (2) (1998) 29–38.Google Scholar
Pinon J., Husson C., Au chevet de la forêt, SCEREN – CNDP, TDC nº 890, 2005, 56 p.
Kondo, E.S., Scope and limitations of carbendazim-H2PO4 injections in Dutch elm disease control, J. Arboric. 4 (1978) 80–86.Google Scholar
Anon., Rapport annuel qualité et de la protection des végétaux, Année 2005, FREDON Paca, Hyères, France, 2006.
Murdoch C.W., Coleman J.S., Campana R.J., Bark cracks associated with injection wounds in elms, J. Arboric. 9 (3) (1983).
Tomlinson P.B., The structural biology of palms, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1990.
Abraham, V.A., Al-Shuaibi, M.A., Faleiro, J.R., Abuzuhairah, R.A., Vidyasagar, P.S., An integrated management approach for red date palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliv., a key pest of date palm in Middle East, Sultan Qabus Univ. J. Sci. Res. Agric. Sci. 3 (1998) 77–84.Google Scholar
El-Ezaby, F.A., Injection as a method to control the red Indian date palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, Arab. J. Plant Prot. 15 (1) (1997) 31–38.Google Scholar
Abraham, V.A., Faleiro, J.R., Nair, C.P.R, Nair, S.S., Present management technologies for red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Cuculionidae) in palms and future thrust areas, Pest Manag. Hortic. Ecosyst. 8 (2) (2002) 69–81.Google Scholar
Soroker, V., Blumberg, D., Haberman, A.M., Hamburger-Rishard, M., Reneh, S., Talebaev, S., Anshelevich, L., Harari, A.R., The current status of red palm weevil infestation in date palm plantations in Israel, Phytoparasitica 33 (2005) 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barranco P., Lorente F., Alcázar M.D., Peña J., Control de Rhynchophorus ferrugineus en España: ensayos y aplicaciones en campo. I jornadas internacionales sobre el picudo rojo de las palmeras, Fund. Agrimed, Valencia, Espana, 2006, pp. 105–117.
Faleiro, J.R., A review on the issues and management of red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Rhynchophoridae) in coconut and date palm during the last one hundred years, Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 26 (3) (2006) 135–154.Google Scholar
Ferry, M., Gómez, S., Une nouvelle stratégie contre le charançon rouge des palmiers, Phytoma 620 (2008) 24–28.Google Scholar
Gómez, S., Ferry, M., Barbado, J., Hernandez, F., Montero, F., Aplicación de una estrategia de control integrado del picudo rojo de las palmeras (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus), Phytoma 206 (2009) 29–36.Google Scholar
Nadarajan, L., Channa Basavanna, G.P., Trunk injection of systemic insecticides against the coconut black headed caterpillar Nephantis serinopa Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Cryptophasidae), Oléagineux 36 (1981) 239–245.Google Scholar
Franqueville, H., Renard, J.L., Intérêt du phosethyl-Al dans la lutte contre le Phytophtora du cocotier. Modalité d’application, Oléagineux 44 (7) (1989) 351–358.Google Scholar
Kanagaratnam, P., Pinto, J.L., Effect of monocrotophos on the leaf eating caterpillar, Opisina arenosella Walk., when injected into the trunk of the coconut Palm, Cocos 3 (1985) 09–15.Google Scholar
Thevenin, J.M., Motulo, H.F.J., Kharie, S., Renard, J.L., Chemical control of coconut bud rot caused by Phytophthora in Indonesia, Plant. Rech. Dév. 2 (6) (1995) 41–50.Google Scholar
Fernando L.C.P., Wickramananda J.R., Aratchige N.S., Status of coconut mite, Aceria guerreronis in Sri Lanka, In: Proc. International Workshop on Coconut mite (Aceria guerreronis), 6–8 January 2000, Coconut Res. Inst., Sri Lanka, 2002, 1–12.
Jayalakshmi V., Khan H.H., Ganoderma disease of coconut, Indian Coconut J. March (2003) 10–15.
Anon., Developing Asia-pacific strategy for forest invasive species: the coconut beetle problem-bridging agriculture and forestry, Rep. Asia-Pacific For. Invas. Spec. Netw. Workshop, 22–25 Feb., Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2005.
Fu Y., Yanlrun X., Occurence and control of coconut leaf beetle in china, in: Rep. expert consultation on coconut beetle outbreak in APPC member countries, 26–27 Oct. 2004, Bangkok, FAO-RAP publ., Bangkok, Thailand, 2004, 35–81.
Wood, B.J., Trunk injection of systemic insecticides against the bagworm, Metisa plana (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on oil palm, Oléagineux 29 (11) (1974) 499–505.Google Scholar
Hutauruk C., Sipayung A., Development of trunk injection of systemic insecticides against Setora nitens and Thosea asigna on oil palm in North Sumatra, In: Proc. Plant Prot. Conf., Kuala Lumpur, Mal., 1978, 265–278.
Mariau, D., Method of controlling Coelaenomenodera (Coleoptera Hispidae) by injecting systemic insecticides into the trunk of the oil palm, Oléagineux 34 (2) (1979) 51–58.Google Scholar
Vessey, J.C., Control of a leaf spot on oil palm in Honduras with insecticides, Oléagineux 36 (5) (1981) 229–232.Google Scholar
Genty, P., Garzon, M., Garcia, R., Damage and control of the Leptopharsa-Pestalotiopsis complex in oil palm, Oléagineux 38 (5) (1983) 291–299.Google Scholar
Reyes A., Añublo foliar de la palma africana en Colombia, importancia económica, etiología y control, in: VI semin. Problemas fitopatologicos de la palma africana, Bucaramanga, Colombia, 1988.
Singh G., Management of oil palm pests and diseases in Malaysia in 2000, in: Kadir A.A.S.A., Barlow H.S. (Eds.), Pest management and the environment in 2000, CABI Int., Wallingford, U.K., 1992, 195–212.
Caudwell, R.W., Orrell, I., Integrated pest management for oil palm in Papua New Guinea, Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 2 (1) (1997) 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young G.R., A review of Sexava research and control methods in Papua New Guinea, in: Proc. Sixth workshop for tropical agricultural entomologists, Darwin, Austr., 1998, 31–44.
Caudwell, R.W., The successful development and implementation of an integrated pest management system for oil palm in Papua New Guinea, Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 5 (4) (2000) 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hean, Y.T., The intelligent management of Lepidoptera leaf eaters in mature oil palm by trunk injection (a review of principles), Planter 76 (887) (2000) 99–107.Google Scholar
Wood, B.J., Pest control in Malaysia’s perennial crops: A half century perspective tracking the pathway to integrated pest management, Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 7 (2002) 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelani A.R., Hitam A., Khalid R., Serna L.A., Shuib A.R., Rashid A., Ismael F., Mechanical trunk injection for control of Ganoderma, MPOB Inf. Ser. 215 (2004) 4 p.
Page, W.W., Lord, S., The oil palm industry’s approach to the use of pesticides in Papua New Guinea, Planter 82 (958) (2006) 13–21.Google Scholar
Anon., Trunk injection oil palms. A virtue born of necessity, Courrier Agrochem (2009) 20–21.
Abdallah, F.F., AI-Khatri, S.A., Research higlights – The effectiveness of trunk injection and fumigation for the control of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliver, in date palm, Arab Near East Plant Prot. Newsl. 29 (1999) 17–21.Google Scholar
Abdallah, F.F., AI-Khatri, S.A., The effectiveness of trunk injection and fumigation for the control of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliver, in date palm, J. Plant Prot. Trop. 13 (1) (2000) 17–21.Google Scholar
Azam K.M., Razv S.A., Control of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier, using prophylactic spraying of date palms and trunk injection, in: 2nd Int. Conf. Date Palms, U.A.E. Press, AI-Ain, U.A.E., 2001, 216–222.
Lakshmanan P.L., Subba Rao P.B., Subramanian T.R., A note on the control of the coconut red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus with certain new chemicals, Madras Agric. J. 59 (11/12) (1972) 638–639.
Muthuraman, M., Trunk injection of undiluted insecticides – a method to control coconut red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Fab., Indian Coconut J. 15 (1984) 12–14.Google Scholar
Jose, F., Arivudainambi, S., Gailce, L., Management of red palm weevil, Rhyncophorus ferrugineus (Curculionidae: Coleoptera), PIant Arch. 8 (2) (2008) 705–707.Google Scholar
Ginting, C.U., Desmier, R., Utilisation de la technique d’absorption racinaire d’insecticides systémiques pour une protection à long terme des cocotiers et autres cultures industrielles, Oléagineux 42 (2) (1987) 63–71.Google Scholar
Dewhurst C., Trunk drilling, OPRAtive Word, Techn. Note 9, PNGOPRA, Kimbe, PNG, 2006, 3 p.
Janick J., Paull R.E., The encyclopedia of fruit & nuts, CABI Publ.,Wallingford, U.K., 2008.
Wood, B.J., Book review insects on palms, Crop Prot. 21 (2002) 597–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquemard J.C., Le palmier à huile, Ed. Maisonneuve et Larose, Paris, Fr., 1995.
Hernandez-Marante, D., Folk, F., Sanchez, A., Fernandez-Escobar, R., Control del curculiónido ferruginoso de las palmeras (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier) mediante inyecciones al tronco y pulverización foliar, Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 29 (4) (2003) 563–574.Google Scholar
Ferry, M., Gomez, S., El picudo rojo de la palmera datilera: gravedad de la plaga en España y necesidad de un cambio radical y urgente de estrategia en la lucha, Phytoma 185 (2006) 42–46.Google Scholar
Mariau, D., Philippe, R., Advantages and disadvantages of methods of chemical control of Coelaenomenodera minuta (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae) an oil palm-mining insect of the Hispidae family, Oléagineux 38 (6) (1983) 365–367.Google Scholar
ReyesRincon, A., A practical and economical way of plugging up holes in oil palm stems after treatment by injection, Oléagineux 43 (1) (1988) 9–12.Google Scholar
Estevez, A., Ferry, M., Gomez, S., Endotherapy in palms. Study of the efficiency and persistency of thiametoxam in preventive treatments against the red palm weevil, Phytoma 226 (2011) 42–48.Google Scholar
Gómez S., Estevez A., Olmos M., Ferry M., Development of a new method to evaluate efficiency and persistency of active substances used by endotherapy in adult palms for the control of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier, in: VII Ntl. Congr. Appl. Entomol., Abstracts Proc., SEEA, Madrid, Spain, 2011, 40.
Gómez S., Estevez A., Ferry M., Endotherapy in palms. Study of the efficacy and persistence of thiametoxam in preventive treatments against the red palm weevil, in: ESA Annu. Meet., ESA, Reno, U.S.A., 2011.
Khan A.I., Azam K.M., Razvi S.A., Pesticides residual analysis of date palm fruits by gaz-chromatography mass-spectrophotometry, in: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Date Palms, U.A.E. Press, AI-Ain, U.A.E., 2001, 211–215.