Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:44:45.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SIMPLY CONNECTED, SPINELESS 4-MANIFOLDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2019

ADAM SIMON LEVINE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; [email protected]
TYE LIDMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We construct infinitely many compact, smooth 4-manifolds which are homotopy equivalent to $S^{2}$ but do not admit a spine (that is, a piecewise linear embedding of $S^{2}$ that realizes the homotopy equivalence). This is the remaining case in the existence problem for codimension-2 spines in simply connected manifolds. The obstruction comes from the Heegaard Floer $d$ invariants.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Behrens, S. and Golla, M., ‘Heegaard Floer correction terms, with a twist’, Quantum Topol. 9(1) (2018), 137.Google Scholar
Browder, W., ‘Embedding smooth manifolds’, inProc. Int. Congr. Math. (Moscow, 1966) (Izdat. ‘Mir’, Moscow, 1968), 712719.Google Scholar
Cappell, S. E. and Shaneson, J. L., ‘Piecewise linear embeddings and their singularities’, Ann. of Math. (2) 103(1) (1976), 163228.Google Scholar
Cappell, S. E. and Shaneson, J. L., ‘Totally spineless manifolds’, Illinois J. Math. 21(2) (1977), 231239.Google Scholar
Doig, M. I., ‘Finite knot surgeries and Heegaard Floer homology’, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 15(2) (2015), 667690.Google Scholar
Haefliger, A., ‘Knotted spheres and related geometric problems’, inProc. Int. Congr. Math. (Moscow, 1966) (Izdat. ‘Mir’, Moscow, 1968), 437445.Google Scholar
Hom, J., Levine, A. S. and Lidman, T., ‘Knot concordance in homology cobordisms’, 2018, arXiv:0801.07770.Google Scholar
Hom, J. and Wu, Z., ‘Four-ball genus bounds and a refinement of the Ozsváth–Szabó tau invariant’, J. Symplectic Geom. 14(1) (2016), 305323.Google Scholar
Kirby, R. (Ed.), Problems in Low-dimensional Topology, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 2 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997).Google Scholar
Levine, A. S., Ruberman, D. and Strle, S., ‘Nonorientable surfaces in homology cobordisms’, Geom. Topol. 19(1) (2015), 439494; with an appendix by I. M. Gessel.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., ‘A 4-manifold which admits no spine’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 81 (1975), 467470.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. and Venema, G. A., ‘Failure of the Dehn lemma on contractible 4-manifolds’, Invent. Math. 51(3) (1979), 205218.Google Scholar
Ni, Y. and Wu, Z., ‘Cosmetic surgeries on knots in S 3 ’, J. Reine Angew. Math. 706 (2015), 117.Google Scholar
Ozsváth, P. S. and Szabó, Z., ‘Absolutely graded Floer homologies and intersection forms for four-manifolds with boundary’, Adv. Math. 173(2) (2003), 179261.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. A., ‘Floer homology and knot complements’, PhD Thesis, Harvard University, 2003, arXiv:math/0509499.Google Scholar
Shaneson, J. L., ‘Spines and spinelessness’, inGeometric Topology (Proc. Conf., Park City, Utah, 1974), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 438 (Springer, Berlin, 1975), 431440.Google Scholar
Wall, C. T. C., Surgery on Compact Manifolds, London Mathematical Society Monographs, 1 (Academic Press, London, New York, 1970).Google Scholar