Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:05:51.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Put-call parity, the triple contract, and approaches to usury in medieval contracting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2015

Arthur J. Wilson  and
Geetae Kim
Arthur J. Wilson*
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Geetae Kim
Affiliation:
George Washington University
*
Arthur Wilson (corresponding author), email: [email protected], Finance Department, George Washington University School of Business, 2201 G Street NW, Duquès Hall, Washington, DC, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we use put-call parity to show that ambiguity about ownership played a role in medieval businessmen's efforts to circumvent the Catholic Church's usury restrictions. That ambiguity created fertile ground for a financial innovation, the triple contract, that allowed some merchants to accomplish a kind of regulatory arbitrage. We also show that medieval clerics and merchants appear to have had at least an intuitive grasp of put-call parity, and that this insight shaped the Catholic Church's approach to medieval business contracts, and usury, nearly five centuries before put-call parity was described in the scholarly literature.

Keywords

usuryput-call paritytriple contractregulatory arbitrage

JEL classification

B11: Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic) G23: Non-bank Financial Institutions • Financial Instruments • Institutional Investors N23: Europe: Pre-1913
Type
Articles
Information
Financial History Review , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , August 2015 , pp. 205 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADELSON, J. (1957). The early evolution of business organization in France. Business History Review, 31(2), pp. 226–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAUMOL, W. J., PANZAR, J. C. and WILLIG, R. D. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
BERGIER, J-F. (1979). From the fifteenth century in Italy to the sixteenth century in Germany: a new banking concept? Ch. 5 of The Dawn of Modern Banking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, F. and SCHOLES, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), pp. 637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COHEN, E., (1992). Athenian Economy and Society: A Banking Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DE ROOVER, F. E. (1941). Partnership accounts in 12th century Genoa. Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, 15(6), pp. 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE ROOVER, F. E. (1945). Early examples of marine insurance. Journal of Economic History, 2, pp. 172–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE ROOVER, R. (1972). Business, Banking and Economic Thought in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Selected Studies of Raymond de Roover, ed. Kirshner, J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DUGGAN, L. G. (1983). Melchior von Meckau: a missing link in the Eck-Zins disputes of 1514–1516?. Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, 74, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar
ELLICKSON, R. C. and THORLAND, C. D. (1995). Ancient land law: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Israel. Chicago–Kent Law Review, 71, pp. 321–411.Google Scholar
GLAESER, E. L. and SCHEINKMAN, J. (1998). Neither a borrower nor a lender be: an economic analysis of interest restrictions and usury laws. Journal of Law and Economics, 41, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GONZALEZ DE LARA, Y. (2006). Institutions for contract enforcement and risk-sharing: from debt to equity in late medieval Venice. Working paper.Google Scholar
GRAEBER, D. (2012) Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.Google Scholar
HUNT, E. S. and MURRAY, J. (1999). A History of Business in Medieval Europe, 1200–1550. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JONES, N. (2008). Usury. In Whaples, R. (ed.), EH.Net Encyclopedia, 10 February 2008. http://eh.net/encyclopedia/usury/.Google Scholar
KNOLL, M. S. (1994). Put-call parity and the development of the modern mortgage. (Revised) Working Paper 94–12, USC Law School.Google Scholar
KNOLL, M. S. (2005). Regulatory arbitrage using put-call parity. Journal of Applied Finance, 15(1), pp. 64–74.Google Scholar
KNOLL, M. S. (2008). The ancient roots of modern financial innovation: the early history of regulatory arbitrage. Oregon Law Review, 87, pp. 93–116.Google Scholar
KOYAMA, M. (2010). Evading the ‘taint of usury’: the usury prohibition as a barrier to entry. Explorations in Economic History, 47, pp. 420–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LANE, F. C. (1973). Venice: A Maritime Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LANGHOLM, O. (1992). Economics in the Medieval Schools, Wealth, Exchange, Value, Money and Usury according to the Paris Theological Tradition, 1200–1350. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Google Scholar
LOPEZ, R. S. (1971). The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950–1350. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
NELLI, H. O. (1972). The earliest insurance contract – a new discovery. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 39(2), pp. 215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NOONAN, J. T. (1957). The Scholastic Analysis of Usury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
OBERMAN, H. A. (1981). Masters of the Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRYOR, J. H. (1977). Origins of the Commenda contract. Speculum, 52(1), pp. 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSS, S. A., WESTERFIELD, R. W. and JAFFE, J. (2012) Corporate Finance, 10th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 704–8.Google Scholar
ROWAN, S. (1987). Ulrich Zasius: A Jurist in the German Renaissance, 1461–1535. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
RUBIN, J. (2009). Social insurance, commitment, and the origin of law: interest bans in early Christianity. Journal of Law and Economics, 52, pp. 761–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STIGLER, G. J., (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
STOLL, H. R. (1969). The relationship between put and call option prices. Journal of Finance, 24(5), pp. 801–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UDOVITCH, A. L. (1962). At the origins of the western Commenda: Islam, Israel, Byzantium? Speculum, 37(2), pp. 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN DOOSSELAERE, Q. (2009). Commercial Agreements and Social Dynamics in Medieval Genoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WURM, J. P. (1997). Johannes Eck und der oberdeutsche Zinsstreit. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar