Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:03:46.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Financial development and sectoral output growth in nineteenth-century Germany1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2012

Katharina Diekmann
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrü[email protected] and [email protected]
Frank Westermann
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrü[email protected] and [email protected]

Abstract

In this article we re-evaluate the hypothesis that the development of the financial sector was an essential factor behind economic growth in nineteenth-century Germany. We apply a structural VAR framework to a new annual data set from 1870 to 1912 that was initially compiled by Walther Hoffmann (1965). With respect to the literature, the distinguishing characteristic of our analysis is the focus on different sectors in the economy and the interpretation of the findings in the context of a two-sector growth model. We find that all sectors were affected significantly by shocks from the banking system. Interestingly, this link is the strongest in sectors with small or non-tradable-goods-producing firms, such as construction, services, transportation and agriculture. In this regard, the growth patterns in nineteenth-century Germany are similar to those in today's emerging markets.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, T., Levine, R. and Loayza, N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, pp. 261300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blömer, M. (1990). Die Entwicklung des Agrarkredits in der preussischen Provinz Westfalen im 19. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Fritz Knapp Verlag.Google Scholar
Bordo, M. D. (2002). Globalization in historical perspective. Business Economics, 37, pp. 20–9.Google Scholar
Burhop, C. (2002). Die Entwicklung der deutschen Aktienkreditbanken von 1848 bis 1913: Quantifizierungsversuche. Bankhistorisches Archiv, 28, pp. 103–28.Google Scholar
Burhop, C. (2005). Industrial production in the German empire, 1871–1913. Mimeo, University of Münster.Google Scholar
Burhop, C. (2006). Did banks cause the German industrialisation? Explorations in Economic History, 43, pp. 3963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burhop, C. and Wolff, G. B. (2005). A compromise estimate of German net national product, 1851–1913, and its implications for growth and business cycle. Journal of Economic History, 65, pp. 613–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Y.-W. and Lai, K. S. (1993). Finite-sample sizes of Johansen's likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 55, pp. 313–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. (1985). British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DEUTSCHE BUNDESBANK (1976). Deutsches Geld- und Bankwesen in Zahlen 1876–1975. Frankfurt: Fritz Knapp GmbH.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. and Fischer, K. (1994). Banks, Finance, and Investment in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. and Nibler, M. (2000). Corporate governance in Germany: the role of banks and ownership concentration. Economic Policy, 15, pp. 237–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. and Ogilvie, S. (1996). Universal banks and German industrialization: a reappraisal. Economic History Review, 49, pp. 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, pp. 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T. W. (2001). Cooperatives as information machines: German rural credit cooperatives, 1883–1914. Journal of Economic History, 61, pp. 366–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinnane, T. W. (2002). Delegated monitors, large and small: Germany's banking system, 1800–1914. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, pp. 73124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, W. G. (1965). Das Wachstum der deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF (2003). World Economic Outlook. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, pp. 1551–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. G. and Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 717–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. and Tornell, A. (1999). The role of bank restructuring in recovering from crises: Mexico 1995–98. NBER Working Paper no. 7042, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, pp. 688726.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, J. K. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests. In Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. (eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'rourke, K. H. and Williamson, J. G. (1999). The Heckscher-Ohlin model between 1400 and 2000: when it explained factor price convergence, when it did not, and why. NBER Working Paper no. 7411, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. A. (1981). The agricultural revolution in Germany, 1850–1914. Journal of European Economic History, 10, pp. 71118.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88, pp. 559–86.Google Scholar
Rancière, R. and Tornell, A. (2010). Financial liberalization, boom–bust cycles and production efficiency. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. L. and Wachtel, P. (1998). Financial intermediation and economic performance: historical evidence from five industrial countries. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 30, pp. 657–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, P. L. and Wachtel, P. (2000). Equity markets and growth: cross-country evidence on timing and outcomes, 1980–1995. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, pp. 1933–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schularick, M. and Steger, T. (2010). Financial integration, investment, and economic growth: evidence from two eras of financial globalization. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, pp. 756–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornell, A. and Schneider, M. (2004). Balance sheet effects, bailout guarantees and financial crises. Review of Economic Studies, 71, pp. 883913.Google Scholar
Tornell, A. and Westermann, F. (2005). Boom–Bust Cycles and Financial Liberalization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tornell, A., Westermann, F. and Martinez, L. (2003). Liberalization, growth and financial crises: lessons from Mexico and the developing world. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp.188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zanden, J. L. (1991). The first green revolution: the growth of production and productivity in European agriculture, 1870–1914. Economic History Review, 44, pp. 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. B. (1977). Tariff protection for the iron industry, cotton textiles and agriculture in Germany, 1879–1914. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 192, pp. 336–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. B. (1982). Agricultural protection in Wilhelminian Germany: forging an empire with pork and rye. Journal of Economic History, 42, pp. 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar