² O'Sullivan, M., Innovation, industrial development, and corporate governance, Ph.D. thesis (Harvard University, 1996)Google Scholar; and Lazonick, W. and O'Sullivan, M., ‘Organization, finance, and international competition’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ O'Sullivan, Innovation.

⁴ ibid.; Lazonick, W., ‘Controlling the market for corporate control’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ See Lazonick, W. and O'Sullivan, M., ‘Big business and skill formation in the wealthiest nations: the organizational revolution in the twentieth century’, in Amatori, F., Chandler, A. D. Jr. and Hikino, T. (eds), Big Business and the Wealth of Nations (Cambridge, Mass., 1996)Google Scholar; Lazonick and O'Sullivan, ‘Organization’; O'Sullivan, Innovation, chs 5–6; and Lazonick, W., Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy (Cambridge, 1990), chs 1–3.Google Scholar

⁶ ‘Firms Ponder How Best to Use Their Cash’, Wall Street Journal, 16 Oct. 1995, pp. A1, A9.Google Scholar

⁷ W. Lazonick and M. O'Sullivan, ‘Corporate employment and corporate governance: is prosperity sustainable in the United States?’, Report to the Jerome Levy Economics Institute (Oct. 1996).

⁸ Navin, T. and Sears, M., ‘Rise of a market in industrial securities’, Business History Review, 29 (1955)Google Scholar; and Chandler, A. D. Jr, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977).Google Scholar

⁹ Navin, and Sears, , ‘Rise of a market’, p. 108.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Nelson, R. L., Merger Movements in American Industry, 1895–1956 (Princeton, NJ, 1959), p. 94.Google Scholar

¹¹ Flynn, J. T., Security Speculation: Its Economic Effects (New York, 1934), p. 140.Google Scholar

¹² Means, G. C., ‘The diffusion of stock ownership in the United States’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Carosso, V. P., Investment Banking in America (Cambridge, Mass., 1970), p. 250Google Scholar; and United States Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States (Washington, DC, 1976), pp. 1005–6.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Means, , ‘Diffusion of stock ownership’, p. 568.Google Scholar

¹⁵ ibid.

¹⁶ Carosso, Investment Banking, ch. 14.

¹⁷ Dewing, A. S., A Study of Corporation Securities, and Their Nature and Uses in Finance (New York, 1934), p. 98.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York, 1932), p. 56.Google Scholar

¹⁹ US Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics, p. 1006.Google Scholar

²⁰ Sears, J. H., The New Place of the Stockholder (New York, 1929), pp. 90–1.Google Scholar

²¹ Horwitz, M., The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, Mass., 1977)Google Scholar; idem, The Transformation of American Law: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy, 1870–1960 (New York, 1992)Google Scholar; and Sklar, M. J., The Corporate Reconstruction of America, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law and Politics (Cambridge, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²² Hurst, J. W., The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780–1970 (Charlottesville, Va, 1970).Google Scholar

²³ Stevens, ‘Stockholders' voting’.

²⁴ Hurst, Legitimacy; and see also Michie, R., The London and New York Stock Exchanges, 1850–1914 (London, 1987).Google Scholar

²⁵ Belkaoui, A., Industrial Bonds and the Rating Process (Westport, Conn., 1983), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

²⁶ Koch, A. R., The Financing of Large Corporations, 1920–39 (New York, 1943).Google Scholar

²⁷ ibid., ch. 6.

²⁸ ibid., p. 81

²⁹ See Hall, B. H., ‘Corporate restructuring and investment horizons in the United States, 1976–1987’, Business History Review, 68 (1994), p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁰ Lorsch, J., with Maclver, E., Pawns or Potentates: Tfie Reality of America's Corporate Boards (Boston, Mass., 1989).Google Scholar

³¹ For example, Roe, M., Strong Managers, Weak Owners (Princeton, NJ, 1994).Google Scholar

³² O'Sullivan, Innovation, ch. 4.

³³ US Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics, p. 914.Google Scholar

³⁴ Mowery, D., ‘Industrial research, 1900–1950’, in Elbaum, B. and Lazonick, W. (eds), The Decline of the British Economy (Oxford, 1986), pp. 191–2.Google Scholar

³⁵ Hay, G. and Untiet, C., ‘Statistical measurement of the conglomerate problem’, in Blair, R. D. and Lanzillotti, R. F. (eds), The Conglomerate Corporation: An Antitrust Law and Economics Symposium (Cambridge, Mass., 1981), p. 165.Google Scholar

³⁶ Chandler, A. D. Jr, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1962).Google Scholar

³⁷ O'Sullivan, Innovation, ch. 5.

³⁸ Ravenscraft, D. and Scherer, F. M., Mergers, Sell-Offs, and Economic Efficiency (Washington, DC, 1987), pp. 30, 32, 38, 39.Google Scholar

³⁹ See Holland, M., When the Machine Stopped: A Cautionary Tale from Industrial America (Boston, Mass., 1984)Google Scholar; and also Lazonick, W. and West, J., ‘Organizational integration and competitive advantage: explaining strategy and performance in American industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 4 (1995), pp. 261–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁰ Chandler, A. D. Jr, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass., 1990), p. 624.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Editors, Fortune: The Conglomerate Commotion (New York, 1970).Google Scholar

⁴² US Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics, p. 928.Google Scholar

⁴³ Ravenscraft, and Scherer, , Mergers, p. 190.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Merrill Lynch Advisory Services, Mergerstat Review (New York, 1994), p. 120.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Taggart, R. A. Jr, ‘The growth of the “junk” bond market and its role in financing takeovers’, in Auerbach, A. J. (ed.), Mergers and Acquisitions (Chicago, 1988), p. 9Google Scholar; and Bruck, C., The Predators' Ball: The Junk-Bond Raiders and the Man Who Staked Them (New York, 1988), pp. 27, 37–8, 44.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ ibid., ch. 1.

⁴⁷ Taggart, , ‘Growth of the “junk” bond market’, p. 9.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ ibid., p. 8; Bruck, Predators' Ball; and Stewart, J. B., Den of Thieves (New York, 1991).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Perry, K. J. and Taggart, R. A. Jr, ‘Development of the junk bond market and its role in portfolio management and corporate finance’, in Altman, E. I. (ed.), The High-Yield Debt Market: Investment, Performance, and Economic Impact (Homewood, Ill. 1990), p. 187.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Holland, When the Machine Stopped.

⁵¹ Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D., ‘The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior’, Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990); and Hall, ‘Corporate restructuring’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵² Joseph, F. H., ‘A Wall Street view of the high-yield debt market and corporate leverage’, in Altman, High-Yield Debt Market, pp. 123–4.Google Scholar

⁵³ Jensen, M. C., ‘The eclipse of the public corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 67 (1989), p. 65Google Scholar; and Merrill Lynch Advisory Services, Mergerstat Review, p. 95.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Jensen, ‘Eclipse of the public corporation’; and idem, ‘The agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers’, American Economic Review, 76 (1986)Google Scholar. See also Burrough, B. and Helyar, J., Barbarians at the Gate (New York, 1990)Google Scholar; Anders, G., Merchants of Debt: KKR and the Mortgaging of American Business (New York, 1992)Google Scholar; Johnston, M., Takeover: The New Wall Street Warriors (New York, 1986); Stewart, Den of Thieves; and Bruck, Predators’ Ball.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Shleifer, A. and Summers, L. H., ‘Breach of trust in hostile takeovers’, in Auerbach, A. J. (ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ E. Wyatt, ‘Money keeps pouring into market funds’, New York Times, 7 Mar. 1996.

⁵⁷ United States Congress, Economic Report of the President, 1996 (Washington, DC, 1996), pp. 343, 360.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Ghilarducci, T., Labor's Capital: The Economics and Politics of Private Pensions (Cambridge, Mass., 1992), p. 3.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Editors, Fortune: Conglomerate, p. 142.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Vietor, R. H. K., ‘Regulation-defined financial markets: fragmentation and integration in financial services’, in Hayes, S. L. III (ed.), Wall Street and Regulation (Boston, Mass., 1987), pp. 42–5Google Scholar; Auletta, K., Greed and Glory on Wall Street (New York, 1986)Google Scholar; and Carrington, T., The Year They Sold Wall Street (Boston, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

⁶¹ See, for example, Blair, M., Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century (Washington, DC, 1995), ch. 5.Google Scholar

⁶² See Church, R., ‘The family firm in industrial capitalism: international perspectives on hypotheses and history’, Business History, 35 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶³ Elbaum, and Lazonick, , Decline of the British Economy.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Burgess, K., The Origins of British Industrial Relations (London, 1975)Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, E., Workers: Worlds of Labor (New York, 1984)Google Scholar; Elbaum, and Lazonick, , Decline of the British EconomyGoogle Scholar; Harrison, R. and Zeitlin, J. (eds), Divisions of Labour: Skilled Workers and Technological Change in Nineteenth Century England (Brighton, 1985)Google Scholar; and Lazonick, W., Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor (Cambridge, Mass., 1990).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Noble, D., America by Design (New York, 1977).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Ferleger, L. and Lazonick, W., ‘The managerial revolution and the developmental state: the case of US agriculture’, Business and Economic History, 2nd ser., 22 (1993)Google Scholar; and idem, ‘Higher education for innovation: land-grant colleges and the managerial revolution’, Business and Economic History, 2nd ser., 23 (1994).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ See Lazonick, W., ‘Strategy, structure, and management development in the United States and Britain’, in Kobayashi, K. and Morikawa, M. (eds), Development of Managerial Enterprise (Tokyo, 1986).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Reader, W., Imperial Chemical Industries, 2 vols (Oxford, 1970 and 1975)Google Scholar; and Wilson, C., The History of Unilever (Cambridge, 1968).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Rubenstein, W. D., ‘Wealth, elites, and the class structure of modern Britain’, Past and Present, 76 (1977)Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Victorian middle classes: wealth, occupation, and geography’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 30 (1977)Google Scholar; Cassis, Y., ‘Bankers in English society in the late nineteenth century’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 38 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Daunton, M., ‘“Gentlemanly capitalism” and British industry, 1820–1914’, Past and Present, 122 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and idem, ‘Financial elites and British society, 1880–1950’, in Cassis, Y. (ed.), Finance and Financiers in European History, 1880–1960 (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Lazonick, , ‘Strategy, structure and management development’, pp. 119–34.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Rubenstein, , ‘Victorian middle classes’Google Scholar; and Jeremy, D. J., ‘Anatomy of the British business elite, 1860–1980’, Business History, 26 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷² Coleman, D. C., ‘Gentlemen and players,’ Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 26 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷³ Cambridge University Appointments Board, University Education and Business (Cambridge, 1945), pp. 39–40Google Scholar; and Acton Society Trust, Management Succession (London, 1956), pp. 28–9.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Sanderson, M., ‘The English civic universities and the “industrial spirit”, 1870–1914’, Historical Research, 61 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁵ Lazonick, , ‘Strategy, structure, and management development’, pp. 119–34.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Edelstein, M., Overseas Investment in the Age of High Imperialism, 1850–1914 (New York, 1982)Google Scholar; Chapman, S., The Rise of Merchant Banking (London, 1984)Google Scholar; Pollard, S., ‘Capital exports: harmful or beneficial’, Economic History Review, 38 (1985)Google Scholar; Daunton, , ‘“Gentlemanly capitalism” and British industry’Google Scholar; Thomas, W. A., The Finance of British Industry, 1918–1976 (London, 1978), p. 48Google Scholar; and Cottrell, P. L., Industrial Finance, 1830–1914: The Finance and Organization of English Manufacturing Industry (London, 1980), pp. 181–2.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Thomas, , Finance of British Industry, chs 3 and 7Google Scholar; Best, M. and Humphries, J., ‘The City and industrial decline’, in Elbaum and Lazonick, Decline of the British EconomyGoogle Scholar; and Cassis, Y., ‘British finance: success and controversy’, in Van Helten, J. J. and Cassis, Y. (eds), Capitalism in a Mature Economy: Financial Institutions, Capital Exports, and British Industry, 1870–1939 (Aldershot, 1990).Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Michie, , London and New York Stock Exchanges.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Jefferys, J. B., Business Organisation in Great Britain, 1856–1914 (New York, 1977), p. 371Google Scholar; and see also Cottrell, , Industrial Finance, ch. 5.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Harrison, A. E., ‘Joint-stock company flotation in the cycle, motor vehicle and related industries, 1882–1914’, Business History, 23 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Michie, R. C., ‘The Stock Exchange and the British economy, 1870–1939,’Google Scholar; in Van Helten, and Cassis, , Capitalism in a Mature Economy.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Thomas, , Finance of British Industry, ch. 2.Google Scholar

⁸² Michie, , London and New York Stock ExchangesGoogle Scholar; and Cottrell, , Industrial Finance, pp. 184–90.Google Scholar

⁸³ Cottrell, , Industrial Finance, ch. 7Google Scholar; Thomas, , Finance of British Industry, ch. 7Google Scholar; Ross, D. M., ‘The clearing banks and industry – new perspectives on the inter-war years,’Google Scholar in Van Helten, and Cassis, , Capitalism in a Mature EconomyGoogle Scholar; and see also Harrison, A. E., ‘F. Hopper & Co.: the problems of capital supply in the cycle manufacturing industry, 1891–1914’, Business History, 24 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸⁴ Ross, , ‘Clearing banks’Google Scholar; and Collins, M., Banks and Industrial Finance in Britain, 1800–1939 (Cambridge, 1995), ch. 6.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Tolliday, S., ‘Steel and rationalization policies, 1918–1950’Google Scholar, in Elbaum, and Lazonick, , Decline of the British EconomyGoogle Scholar; Bamberg, H., ‘The rationalisation of the British cotton industry in the interwar years’, Textile History, 19 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸⁶ Hannah, L., The Rise of the Corporate Economy (Baltimore, 2nd ed., 1983), ch. 3.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ ibid., p. 93.

⁸⁸ Chandler, A. D. Jr, ‘The growth of the transnational industrial firm in the United States and the United Kingdom: a comparative analysis’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 33 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hannah, , Rise of the Corporate Economy, ch. 7.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Thomas, , Finance of British Industry, ch. 6.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Singh, A., ‘Take-overs, economic natural selection and the theory of the firm: evidence from the postwar United Kingdom experience’, Economic Joumal, 85 (1975), p. 499.Google Scholar

⁹¹ ibid.; and Chandler, , Scale and Scope, ch. 9.Google Scholar

⁹² See Hannah, L., ‘Takeover bids in Britain before 1950: an exercise in business “pre-history”’, Business History, 15 (1974)Google Scholar; Wright, J. F., ‘The capital market and the finance of industry’, in Worswick, G. D. N. and Ady, P. H. (eds), The British Economy in the Nineteen-Fifties (Oxford, 1962)Google Scholar; and Singh, , ‘Take-Overs’.Google Scholar

⁹³ Thomas, , Finance of British Industry, pp. 236, 240–1.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Hannah, L., Inventing Retirement: The Development of Occupational Pensions in Britain (Cambridge, 1986), ch. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹⁵ Ghilarducci, T., ‘International pension funds and capital markets’, photocopy (AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, 1994).Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Charkham, J., Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries (Oxford, 1994), ch. 6.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Jensen, , ‘Eclipse of public corporation’.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Crystal, G., In Search of Excess: The Overcompensation of American Executives (New York, 1991).Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Lazonick, , ‘Controlling the market’, pp. 461–6.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ O'Sullivan, , Innovation, ch.7.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Reich, R. B., ‘How to avoid these layoffs?’, New York Times, 4 01 1996, A13Google Scholar; and ‘Shareholder values’, The Economist, 10 02 1996, p. 15.Google Scholar