Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:40:10.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liquidity preference and interest-bearing money: the Ottoman Empire, 1840–1851

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2013

Richard C. K. Burdekin  and
Meric Keskinel
Richard C. K. Burdekin*
Affiliation:
Robert Day School of Economics & Finance, Claremont McKenna College
Meric Keskinel*
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral & Social Sciences, West Los Angeles College
*
1Corresponding author: R. Burdekin, Jonathan B. Lovelace Professor of Economics, Claremont McKenna College, 500 E. Ninth Street, Claremont, CA 91711, USA, [email protected].
M. Keskinel: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legal restrictions theory suggests that interest-bearing money would dominate if there were no legal impediments precluding competition with non-interest-bearing currency. There are very few historical examples with meaningful issues of interest-bearing currency, however, and these tend to occur during extreme circumstances like civil war. The Ottoman Empire in the 1840s offers an unusual opportunity to observe large-scale issuance of interest-bearing notes under stable conditions over an extended period of time. This experience features government-issued interest-bearing money circulating in the absence of legal restrictions – with the data pointing to a liquidity preference favouring the smaller denominations most useful in daily transactions.

Keywords

interest-bearing currencylegal restrictionsOttoman EmpireIstanbul

JEL classification

E42: Monetary Systems • Standards • Regimes • Government and the Monetary System • Payment Systems N21: U.S. • Canada: Pre-1913
Type
Articles
Information
Financial History Review , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akyildiz, A. (1996). Osmanlı finans sisteminde dönüm noktası: kağıt para ve sosyo-ekonomik etkileri. Istanbul: Eren Yayincilik.Google Scholar
Autheman, A. (1996). La Banque Impériale Ottomane. Paris: Comité pour l'histoire économique et financière, Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernholz, P. (2008). Government bankruptcy of Balkan nations and their consequences for money and inflation before 1914: a comparative analysis. Working Paper 74, Bank of Greece, June [www.bankofgreece.gr/BogEkdoseis/Paper200874.pdf].Google Scholar
Berument, H. and Gunay, A. (2007). Inflation dynamics and its sources in the Ottoman Empire: 1586–1913. International Review of Applied Economics, 21, pp. 207–45.Google Scholar
Birdal, M. (2010). The Political Economy of Ottoman Public Debt: Insolvency and European Financial Control in the Late Nineteenth Century. London: Tauris Academic Studies.Google Scholar
Burdekin, R. C. K. and Weidenmier, M. D. (2002). Interest-bearing currency and legal restrictions theory: lessons from the Southern Confederacy. Cato Journal, 22, pp. 199–209.Google Scholar
Burdekin, R. C. K. and Weidenmier, M. D. (2008). Can interest-bearing money circulate? A small-denomination Arkansan experiment, 1861–1863. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 40, pp. 233–41.Google Scholar
Calvo, G. and Végh, C. A. (1996). Disinflation and interest-bearing money. Economic Journal, 106, pp. 1546–63.Google Scholar
Cowen, T. and Kroszner, R. (1987). The development of the new monetary economics. Journal of Political Economy, 95, pp. 567–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, R. H. (1980). The first Ottoman experiment with paper money. In Okyar, O. and İnalcik, H. (eds.), Social and Economic History of Turkey (1071–1920). Ankara: Meteksan.Google Scholar
Eldem, E. (2005). Ottoman financial integration with Europe: foreign loans, the Ottoman Bank and the Ottoman public debt. European Review, 13, pp. 431–45.Google Scholar
Güran, T. (2003). Osmanlı malî istatistikleri: bütçeler, 1841–1918 (Tarihi İstatistikler Dizisi Cilt 7). Ankara: State Institute of Statistics.Google Scholar
Issawi, C. (1980). The Economic History of Turkey, 1800–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ortayli, İ. (2006). İmparatorluǧun en unzun yüzyılı. Istanbul: Alkim Yayinevi.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Ş. (1987). The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism, 1820–1913. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Ş. (2000). A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Ş. (2001). 500 Years of Prices and Wages in Istanbul and Other Cities. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Ş. (2004). Prices in the Ottoman Empire, 1469–1914. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 36, pp. 451–68.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Ş. (2006). From debasement to external borrowing: changing forms of deficit finance in the Ottoman Empire, 1750–1914. In Avramov, R. and Pamuk, Ş. (eds.), Monetary and Fiscal Policies in South-East Europe: Historical and Comparative Perspective. Sofia: Bulgarian National Bank.Google Scholar
Rolnick, A. J. and Weber, W. E. (1986). Gresham's law or Gresham's fallacy? Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toprak, Z. (2005). The Ottoman realities and economic mind in the age of nation state (1839–1914). Paper presented at the University of Athens, Greece [www.econ.uoa.gr/ua/files/811318924..pdf].Google Scholar
Toprak, Z. (2008). The financial structure and the stock exchange in the late Ottoman Empire. In Cottrell, P. L. (ed.), East Meets West – Banking, Commerce and Investment in the Ottoman Empire. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Van Dyck, E. A. (1881). Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire since the Year 1150, part 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wallace, N. (1983). A legal restrictions theory of the demand for ‘money’ and the role of monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 7, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
White, C. (1845). Three Years in Constantinople; or, Domestic Manners of the Turks in 1844, vol. II. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
White, L. H. (1987). Accounting for non-interest-bearing currency: a critique of the legal restrictions theory of money. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 19, pp. 448–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar