Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T16:22:49.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shared stakes, distributed investment: Socially engaged art and the financialization of social impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Emily Rosamond
Emily Rosamond*
Affiliation:
Arts University Bournemouth, UK
*
Corresponding author: Emily Rosamond, Arts University Bournemouth, Poole, Dorset BH12 5HH, UK. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article examines the implications of the financialization of social impact and the emerging social impact bonds (SIBs) market for socially engaged art practices. How do SIBs, which allow for investment in social impact metrics, shift the broader contexts through which the value of social impact is understood in art discourses? In the British context, recent projects by Assemble, Open School East and others do important social work, yet echo the logic of the social investment market by outsourcing social impact. Rather than dismissing socially engaged art initiatives as having been recuperated by financialized capitalism, I suggest the need to develop new ways of achieving a double reading of these works as they relate to - and upset the distinctions between - stakeholder and bondholder valuation.

Keywords

Socially engaged artsocial impact bondssocial impact investingfinancialization
Type
Article
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 2 , Issue 2: Art and finance , 2016 , pp. 111 - 126
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2016 The Author(s)

References

Birkwood, S. (2014) Peterborough prison social impact pilot fails to hit target to trigger payments. Third Sector. Available at: <http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/peterborough-prison-social-impact-bond-pilot-fails-hit-target-trigger-repayments/finance/article/1307031/>. Accessed 7 April 2016..+Accessed+7+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2004) Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October, 110 (Fall): 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. (2006a) Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2006b) The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents. Artforum, 44(6): 179–85.Google Scholar
Bourriaud, N. (2009) Relational Aesthetics, translated by Pleasance, S. and Woods, F.. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.Google Scholar
Calinescu, M. (1987) Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cave, S., Williams, T., Jolliffe, D. and Hedderman, C. (2012) Peterborough Social Impact Bond: An Independent Assessment. London: Ministry of Justice Research Series.Google Scholar
Chiapello, E. (2015) Financialization of valuation. Human Studies, 38(1): 13–35.10.1007/s10746-014-9337-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Sir R. (2011) Harnessing social entrepreneurship and investment to bridge the social divide. Paper presented at the EU Conference on the Social Economy, Brussels, 18 November.Google Scholar
Disley, E., Rubin, J., Scraggs, E. et al. (2011) Lessons Learned from the Planning and Early Implementation of the Social Impact Bond at HMP Peterborough. London: UK Ministry of Justice. Available at: <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/social-impact-bond-at-hmp-peterborough/>. Accessed 1 April 2016.Google Scholar
Disley, E. and Rubin, J. (2014) Phase 2 Report from the Payment by Results Social Impact Bond Pilot at HMP, Peterborough. London: Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, E. (2016) In the wake of austerity: Social impact bonds and the financialization of the welfare state in Britain. New Political Economy, DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1232709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, E. and Harvie, D. (2014) Harnessing the social: State, crisis and (big) society. Sociology, 48(5): 870–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, D. (1967) The idea of ‘avant-garde’ in art and politics. American Historical Review, 73(2): 33966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, R. and Pelsinger, S. (2014) Social Impact Bonds 101. Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Uunl4uMOog>. Accessed 1 April 2016..+Accessed+1+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Feher, M. (2009) Self-appreciation: Or, the aspirations of human capital [Translated by I. Ascher]. Public Culture, 21(1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feher, M. (2013) The neoliberal condition and its predecessors: Redemption, fulfillment, appreciation. Operative Thought Lecture Series, Department of Visual Cultures, Goldsmiths, University of London. 20 November.Google Scholar
Feher, M. (2015) Thank you for sharing: The social life of human capital. Operative Thought Lecture Series, Department of Visual Cultures, Goldsmiths, University of London, 28 January.Google Scholar
Foster, H. (2003) Arty party. London Review of Books, 25(23): 21-22. Available at: <http://www.lrb.co.uk/v25/n23/hal-foster/arty-party/>. Accessed 14 October 2016.Google Scholar
Fox, C. and Albertson, K. (2011) Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5): 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayford, G. (2015) Martin Gayford on Assemble and the worrying implications of the Turner Prize. ArtNet News, 11 December. Available at: <https://news.artnet.com/art-world/martin-gayford-2015-turner-prize-winners-391148/>. Accessed 4 April 2016..+Accessed+4+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2004) The new imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40: 63–87.Google Scholar
Harvie, J. (2011) Democracy and neoliberalism in art's social turn and Roger Hiorns’ Seizure. Performance Research, 16(2): 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, C. (2015) Turner Prize winners Assemble: ‘Art? We're more interested in plumbing’. The Guardian, 8 December. Available at: <http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/dec/08/assemble-turner-prize-architects-are-we-artists/>. Accessed 4 April 2016.. Accessed 4 April 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Higgins,+C.+(2015)+Turner+Prize+winners+Assemble:+‘Art?+We're+more+interested+in+plumbing’.+The+Guardian,+8+December.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+4+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Instiglio (2014) SIBs worldwide map. Available at: <https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/files/2014/02/SIBs-Worldwide-Map.jpg/>. Accessed 5 April 2016..+Accessed+5+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Joy, M. and Shields, J. (2013) Social impact bonds: The next phase of third sector marketization? Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 4(2): 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalin, S. (2014) Innovation in financing international development projects. Harvard Law and International Development Society, 1 February. Available at: <https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/2014/02/01/innovation-in-financing-international-development-projects/>. Accessed 5 April 2016..+Accessed+5+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Kester, G. (2004) Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, J., Besharov, D. and Costa, K. (2012) Fact sheet: Social impact bonds - A brief introduction to a new financing tool for social programs. Center for American Progress, 12 April. Available at: <https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/general/news/2012/04/12/11406/fact-sheet-social-impact-bonds/>. Accessed 3 April 2016..+Accessed+3+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Lazzarato, M. (2014) Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity, translated by Jordan, J.D.. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Lind, M. (2004) Actualization of space: The case of Oda Projesi. Transversal, 10(1). Available at: <http://eipcp.net/transversal/1204/lind/en/>. Accessed 30 August 2016.Google Scholar
Lind, M. (2007) The collaborative turn. In: Billing, B., Lind, M. and Lars, N. (eds.) Taking the Matter into Common Hands: Contemporary art and Collaborative Practices. London: Black Dog, 15–31.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2002) Financialization of Daily Life. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. (2007) Critique of relational aesthetics. Third Text, 21(4): 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, N. et al. (2013) Social impact bonds: A wolf in sheep's clothing? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(3): 247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, K. (2013) Evaluating Social Impact Bonds as a New Re-entry Financing Mechanism: a Case Study on Re-entry Programming in Maryland. Annapolis, MD: Department of Legislative Services.Google Scholar
Miller, M., Callahan, C., Palandjian, T. and Liebman, J. (2012) Social impact bonds webinar panel. McKinsey and Company, 15 May. Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdU2tLqT5HA/>. Accessed 5 April 2016..+Accessed+5+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Ogman, R. (2016) Social impact bonds: A ‘social neoliberal’ response to the crisis? In: Schönig, B. and Schipper, S. (eds.) Urban Austerity: Impacts of the Global Financial Crisis on Cities in Europe. Berlin: Theater der Zeit, 58–69.Google Scholar
Rodenbeck, J. (2007) The open work: Participatory art since silence. Institute for Distributed Creativity. Available at: <http://distributedcreativity.typepad.com/idc_events/2006/01/the_open_work_p.html/>. Accessed 18 October 2015..+Accessed+18+October+2015.>Google Scholar
Rudd, T., Nicoletti, E., Misner, K. and Bonsu, J. (2013) Financing Promising Evidence-Based Programs: Early Lessons from the New York City Social Impact Bond. New York, NY: MDRC.Google Scholar
Schiller, R. (2013) Capitalism and financial innovation. Financial Analysis Journal, 69(1): 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, S. (2015) The Return of Ordinary Capitalism: Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, R. (2008) The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestri, A. (2012) Critical Reflections: Social and Criminal Justice in the First Year of Coalition Government. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
School of the Damned (2016) FAQ. School of the Damned. Available at: <http://schoolofthedamned.com/>. Accessed 4 April 2016..+Accessed+4+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Social Finance Ltd. (2014) Peterborough social impact bond. Good Deals 2013. Available at: <http://www.socialfinance.org.uk/videos/good-deals-2013-sib-case-study-2-one-service/>. Accessed 2 April 2016..+Accessed+2+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Tate Modern (2015) Turner Prize 2015 artists: Assemble. Available at: <http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tramway/exhibition/turner-prize-2015/turner-prize-2015-artists-assemble/>. Accessed 4 April 2016..+Accessed+4+April+2016.>Google Scholar
van der Zwan, N. (2014) State of the art: Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 12(1): 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, M. (2013) Private finance for public goods: Social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4): 303–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whistler, C. et al. (2014) SOCAP14: The complex anatomy of social impact bonds. Third Sector Capital Partners. Available at: <http://www.thirdsectorcap.org/video-the-complex-anatomy-of-social-impact-bonds-at-socap14/>. Accessed 29 March 2016..+Accessed+29+March+2016.>Google Scholar