Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:36:39.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passive nihilism and ontotheology: A reply to Husbands on derivative temporality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Austin Hayden Smidt
Austin Hayden Smidt*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Austin Hayden Smidt, Department of Political Economy, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conor Husbands’ defense and expansion of Elena Esposito's temporality of finance is a much-needed intervention. However, in this response essay, I will show a few of the fundamental weaknesses of Esposito's project, and by extension will highlight some shortcomings of Husbands’ defense-expansion. The point is not to dismiss either project; the goal is rather to bring attention to certain philosophical presuppositions that ground both, and that enclose each in what Markus Gabriel would call an ontotheological orientation. In short, Esposito and Husbands operate via an orientation that attempts to think ‘the world’ as an all-encompassing domain, despite claims to the contrary. How this occurs will be explained below, paying particular attention to the stakes of thinking from such an ontotheological orientation in and to the world. After first presenting Husbands’ argument, I develop some critiques of Esposito and Husbands via the work of Suhail Malik, Ray Brassier, Elie Ayache, Jon Roffe, and Quentin Meillassoux. I then open the aperture towards emerging trends in philosophy that contest the foundations upon which Esposito's project is built, in order to suggest more robust readings of finance and society. The work of Sergei Prozorov and Markus Gabriel will be the focus here, but these thinkers merely serve as stand-ins for larger trends in speculative- and neo-realism.

Keywords

FinancephilosophytemporalityElena Espositoontotheologynihilism
Type
Essay
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 2021 , pp. 76 - 87
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2021 The Author(s)

References

Ayache, E. (2010) The Blank Swan: The End of Probability. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ayache, E. (2015) The Medium of Contingency: An Inverse View of the Market. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayache, E. (2016) Response to Johnson: A random sample versus the radical event. Finance and Society, 2(2): 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badiou, A. (2006) Being and Event. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badiou, A. (2009) Logics of Worlds: Being and Event II. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (2002) The possible and the real. In: Ansell-Pearson, K. and Mullarkey, J. (eds.) Bergson: Key Writings. London: Continuum, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassier, R. (2017) Pricing time: Outline and discussion on Suhail Malik's ‘The ontology of finance’. Identities, 14(1): 84–128.Google Scholar
Brassier, R. (2018) Concrete-in-thought, concrete-in-act: Marx, materialism, and the exchange abstraction. Crisis & Critique, 5(1): 111–29.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2004) Difference and Repetition. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Esposito, E. (2011) The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2015) Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. (2011) On the undermining of objects: Grant, Bruno, and radical philosophy. In: Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. and Harman, G. (eds.) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press, 21–40.Google Scholar
Husbands, C. (2020) Esposito's temporality of finance: Endogeneity and revisability in derivative transactions. Finance and Society, 6(2): 114–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. (2016) The necessity of multi-disciplinary scholarship for finance: On Ayache and Roffe. Finance and Society, 2(2): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, P. (2012) The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1991) Risk: A Sociological Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2001) Erkenntnis als konstruktion. In: Jahraus, O. (ed.) Niklas Luhmann, Aufsätze und Reden. Stuttgart: Reclam, 218–42.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, S. (2014) The ontology of finance: Price, power, and the Arkhéderivative. Collapse: Philosophical Research and Development, 8: 629–812.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Q. (2008) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzan, J. and Bichler, S. (2009) Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polidori, T. (2014) The fate of theology after the speculative turn. ThéoRemes, 6(1).Google Scholar
Prozorov, S. (2014) Ontology and World Politics: Void Universalism I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roffe, J. (2015) Abstract Market Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roffe, J. (2016) Model hagiography: A reply to Johnson and Munger on probability, philosophy and transcendental argumentation. Finance and Society, 2(2): 217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, F. (2012) The speculative family, or: Critique of the critical critique of critique. Filozofski vestnik, XXXI11(2): 53–76.Google Scholar
Srnicek, N. (2013) Abstraction and value: The medieval origins of financial quantification. In: Joy, E., Klosowska, A., Masciandaro, N. and O'Rourke, M. (eds.) Speculative Medievalisms: Discography. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books, 73–91.Google Scholar
Verene, D. (2007) Hegel's Absolute: An Introduction to Reading the Phenomenology of Spirit. New York: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, J. (2015) The Specter of Capital. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2011) Objects in manifold time: Deleuze and the speculative philosophy of object as processes. Cosmos and History, 7(1): 62–75.Google Scholar