No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Immunization, sensibility, and the ressentiments of finance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2023
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Vogl describes how digital economies and current financialization have a commongenealogy that hinges on protocol and information. How should we understand theanatomy of power that governs this contemporary configuration? As argued in thisreview, the notion of ‘immunity’ can help illuminate thetechniques of power at work in digital economies, social media, and finance.
- Type
- Forum: Capital and ressentiment
- Information
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
- Copyright
- © 2021 The Author(s)
References
Boy, N. and Gabor, D. (2019) Collateral times.
Economy and Society, 48(3):
295–314.10.1080/03085147.2019.1672315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. (2009) A Body Worth Defending: Immunity,
Biopolitics, and the Apotheosis of the Modern Body.
Durham, NC: Duke University
Press.Google Scholar
Galloway, A. (2004) Protocol: How Control Exists After
Decentralization.
Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.10.7551/mitpress/5658.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2021) Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu
einem neuen Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. In:
Seeliger, M. and Sevigni, S. (eds.) Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit:
Leviathan Sonderband 37.
Baden-Baden: Nomos
Verlagsgesellschaft,
470–500.10.5771/9783748912187-470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, K. (2019) The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates
Wealth and Inequality.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.Google Scholar
Riles, A. (2011) Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the
Global Financial Markets.
Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226719344.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellmann, U. (2017) Life and Money: The Genealogy of the Liberal
Economy and the Displacement of Politics.
New York: Columbia University
Press.10.7312/tell18226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellmann, U. (2021a) Immunisieren-Über die
politischen Praktiken der digitalen Finanzökonomie. Kommentar zu
Joseph Vogl: Kapital und Ressentiment im Spiegel des
Souveränitätseffekts. Behemoth: A
Journal on Civilisation, 14(1):
30–35.Google Scholar
Tellmann, U. (2021b) The politics of assetization: From devices of
calculation to devices of obligation. Distinktion: Journal for Social
Theory, forthcoming.10.1080/1600910X.2021.1991419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, J. (2017) The Ascendancy of Finance,
translated by Garnett, S.. Cambridge:
Polity.Google Scholar
Vogl, J. (2021) Kapital und Ressentiment: Eine kurze Theorie
der Gegenwart.
München:
C.H. Beck.10.17104/9783406769559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, J. (2022) Capital and Ressentiment,
translated by Solomon, N.. Cambridge:
Polity.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access