Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:03:36.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crisis in history or crisis historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Janet Roitman*
Affiliation:
The New School, USA
*
Corresponding author: Janet Roitman, The New School,Albert and Vera List Academic Center, 6 East 16th Street, New York, USA. Email:[email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

History in Financial Times sheds light on the historiography of contemporary finance. But there is a tension in the book that is inescapable: between the production of crisis historiography, on the one hand, and the practice of the concept of crisis, on the other. There is, in other words, a barely articulated distinction between crisis as a “metahistorical force” and crisis as a “peculiar, naturalist” category.

Type
Forum: History in financial times
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2020 The Author(s)

References

Asad, T. (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (2008) Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, J. (1983) Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Objects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. (1995) The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Roitman, J. (2014) Anti-Crisis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1979) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Samman, A. (2019) History in Financial Times. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar