Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T20:50:31.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary art, capitalization and the blockchain: On the autonomy and automation of art's value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Laura Lotti
Laura Lotti*
Affiliation:
UNSW Australia, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Laura Lotti, School of the Arts and Media, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article addresses contemporary art as a means to investigate how, and to what extent, financial logic impacts upon the socio-cultural sphere. Its contribution is twofold: on the one hand, the article shows that contemporary art's valuation practices increasingly reflect the logic of capitalization; on the other hand, it assesses the emancipatory potential of blockchain technology for the cultural sphere. In relation to the latter I argue that, in spite of the technological novelty of blockchain-based art projects, these nonetheless fail to challenge a received logic of finance. This exposes the limitations to technological determinism as a means of countering financial power in the socio-cultural sphere, and points to new problems for art's valuation methods in relation to the liquid logic of algorithmic finance.

Keywords

Contemporary artvaluationcapitalizationcomputationblockchain
Type
Article
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 2 , Issue 2: Art and finance , 2016 , pp. 96 - 110
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2016 The Author(s)

References

Akkermans, A. (2016) Hints of the real world in Art Basel's elitist bubble. Hyperallergic, 22 June. Available at: <http://hyperallergic.com/306912/hints-of-the-real-world-in-art-basels-elitist-bubble/>. Accessed 23 June 2016.. Accessed 23 June 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Akkermans,+A.+(2016)+Hints+of+the+real+world+in+Art+Basel's+elitist+bubble.+Hyperallergic,+22+June.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+23+June+2016.>Google Scholar
Altman, A. (2015) Buy, sell, hang on your wall. Bloomberg [Online], 12 November. Available at: <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-12/artrank-gives-art-the-stock-market-treatment/>. Accessed 26 July 2016..+Accessed+26+July+2016.>Google Scholar
Amato, M. and Fantacci, L. (2011) The End of Finance. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, A.M. (2014) Mastering Bitcoin. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media.Google Scholar
ArtRank (n.d.) FAQ: ArtRank. Available at: <http://artrank.com/pages/faq/>. Accessed 8 April 2014..+Accessed+8+April+2014.>Google Scholar
Artsy (n.d.) About: Artsy. Available at: <https://www.artsy.net/about/>. Accessed 24 March 2016..+Accessed+24+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Batycka, D. (2016) The 9th Berlin Biennale: Avast obsolescent pageant of irrelevance. Hyperallergic, 24 June. Available at: <http://hyperallergic.com/306932/the-9th-berlin-biennale-a-vast-obsolescent-pageant-of-irrelevance/>. Accessed 26 June 2016..+Accessed+26+June+2016.>Google Scholar
Bazzichelli, T. (2006) Networking Art: The Net as Artwork. Aarhus: Digital Aesthetics Research Center.Google Scholar
Bazzichelli, T. and Cox, G. (eds.) (2013) Disrupting Business: Art and Activism in Times of Financial Crisis. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (2016) The art of secrecy. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, 7 April. Available at: <https://panamapapers.icij.org/20160407-art-secrecy-offshore.html/>. Accessed 21 April 2016..+Accessed+21+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Bessy, C. and Chauvin, P.-M. (2013) The power of market intermediaries: From information to valuation processes. Valuation Studies, 1(1): 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerg, O. (2016) How is Bitcoin money? Theory, Culture & Society, 33(1): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollier, D. (2015) The blockchain: A promising new infrastructure for online commons. David Bollier: News and Perspectives on the Commons, 4 March. Available at: <http://bollier.org/blog/blockchain-promising-new-infrastructure-online-commons/>. Accessed 1 October 2015..+Accessed+1+October+2015.>Google Scholar
Bryan, D. and Rafferty, M. (2010) Atime and a place for everything: Foundations of commodity money. In: Amato, M., Doria, L. and Fantacci, L. (eds.) Money and Calculation: Economic and Sociological Perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 101–21.Google Scholar
Bryan, D. and Rafferty, M. (2006) Capitalism with Derivatives: A Political Economy of Financial Derivatives, Capital and Class. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buterin, V. (2014) DAOs, DACs, DAs and more: An incomplete terminology guide. Ethereum Blog, 6 May. Available at: <https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/05/06/daos-dacs-das-and-more-an-incomplete-terminology-guide/>. Accessed 1 February 2016..+Accessed+1+February+2016.>Google Scholar
Cascone, S. (2016) Panama papers reveal Ganz Collection secret. Artnet News, 8 April. Available at: <https://news.artnet.com/market/picasso-panama-papers-ganz-collection-469646/>. Accessed 11 June 2016..+Accessed+11+June+2016.>Google Scholar
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2015) CFTC orders Bitcoin options trading platform operator and its CEO to cease illegally offering Bitcoin options and to cease operating a facility for trading or processing of swaps without registering. CFTC [Online], 17 September. Available at: <http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7231-15/>. Accessed 25 September 2015..+Accessed+25+September+2015.>Google Scholar
Constine, J. (2014) Monegraph uses Bitcoin tech so internet artists can establish ‘original’ copies of their work. TechCrunch [Online], 9 May. Available at: <http://social.techcrunch.com/2014/05/09/monegraph/>. Accessed 20 December 2015..+Accessed+20+December+2015.>Google Scholar
Cooper, M. and Konings, M. (2015) Contingency and foundation: Rethinking money, debt, and finance after the crisis. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(2): 239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croggon, A. (2016) The 70% drop in Australia Council grants for individual artists is staggering. The Guardian, 18 May. Available at: <http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2016/may/19/the-70-drop-australia-council-grants-artists-funding-cuts/>. Accessed 28 May 2015..+Accessed+28+May+2015.>Google Scholar
Dash, A. (2014) A bitcoin for digital art. The Message, 9 May. Available at: <https://medium.com/message/a-bitcoin-for-digital-art-8c7db719e495/>. Accessed 26 April 2015..+Accessed+26+April+2015.>Google Scholar
Deloitte and ArtTactics (2014) Art and Finance Report 2014. Available at: <http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/at/Documents/Tax/art-finance-report.pdf/>. Accessed 19 November 2015..+Accessed+19+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Dunn, C. (2016) Dirty little secrets: Inside the ‘Wikileaks’ of the ultra-rich and ultra-powerful. Fusion. Available at: <http://interactive.fusion.net/dirty-little-secrets/>. Accessed 14 April 2016..+Accessed+14+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Farago, J. (2016) Welcome to the LOLhouse: How Berlin's Biennale became a slick, sarcastic joke. The Guardian, 14 June. Available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/jun/13/berlin-biennale-exhibition-review-new-york-fashion-collective-dis-art/>. Accessed 26 July 2016.. Accessed 26 July 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Farago,+J.+(2016)+Welcome+to+the+LOLhouse:+How+Berlin's+Biennale+became+a+slick,+sarcastic+joke.+The+Guardian,+14+June.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+26+July+2016.>Google Scholar
Farago, J. (2012) Artsy and the myth of the online art market. New Republic, 22 October. Available at: <https://newrepublic.com/article/108893/artsy-and-the-myth-the-online-art-market/>. Accessed 24 March 2016..+Accessed+24+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979, trans. G. Burchell. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Goldstein, A. M. (2015) ArtRank founder Carlos Rivera on why he's leading the Flipper Revolution—and why it can't be stopped. Artspace, 11 June. Available at: <http://www.artspace.com/magazine/interviews_features/carlos-rivera-art-rank-interview/>. Accessed 26 July 2016.. Accessed 26 July 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Goldstein,+A.+M.+(2015)+ArtRank+founder+Carlos+Rivera+on+why+he's+leading+the+Flipper+Revolution—and+why+it+can't+be+stopped.+Artspace,+11+June.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+26+July+2016.>Google Scholar
Hearn, M. (2016) The resolution of the Bitcoin experiment. Medium, 14 January. Available at: <https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#—262-344.puwe6jpse/>. Accessed 15 January 2016..+Accessed+15+January+2016.>Google Scholar
Heidenreich, S. (2016) Freeportism as style and ideology: Post-internet and speculative realism, Part I. e-flux, March. Available at: <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/freeportism-as-style-and-ideology-part-i-post-internet-and-speculative-realism/>. Accessed 3 May 2016..+Accessed+3+May+2016.>Google Scholar
ICIJ (2016) The Panama Papers. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, April. Available at: <https://panamapapers.icij.org/>. Accessed 10 May 2016..+Accessed+10+May+2016.>Google Scholar
Ivanova, V. (2015) Art's values: A détente, a grand plié. Parse, 2: 91–105.Google Scholar
Kinsella, E. (2016) What does TEFAF 2016 Art Market Report tell us about the global art trade? Artnet News, 9 March. Available at: <https://news.artnet.com/market/tefaf-2016-art-market-report-443615/>. Accessed 12 March 2016..+Accessed+12+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Leising, M. and Robinson, E. (2015) Blythe Masters tells banks the blockchain changes everything. Bloomberg, 1 September. Available at: <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2015-09-01/blythe-masters-tells-banks-the-blockchain-changes-everything/>. Accessed 19 September 2015..+Accessed+19+September+2015.>Google Scholar
Lury, C., Parisi, L. and Terranova, T. (2012) Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4/5): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, S. and Phillips, A. (2012) Tainted love: Art's ethos and capitalization. In: Lind, M. and Velthuis, O. (eds.) Art and Its Commercial Markets: A Report on Current Changes and with Scenarios for the Future. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 209–40.Google Scholar
McAndrew, C. (2010). An introduction to art and finance. In: McAndrew, C. (ed.) Fine Art and High Finance: Expert Advice on the Economics of Ownership. E-book. New York, NY: Bloomberg Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2014) Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Monegraph (n.d.) NEW Inc. Available at: <http://www.newinc.org/monegraph/>. Accessed 1 February 2016..+Accessed+1+February+2016.>Google Scholar
Morris, J.W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4/5): 446–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, C. (2013) Expanded internet art and the informational milieu. rhizome.org, 19 December. Available at: <http://rhizome.org/editorial/2013/dec/19/expanded-internet-art-and-informational-milieu/>. Accessed 20 December 2013..+Accessed+20+December+2013.>Google Scholar
Nitzan, J. and Bichler, S. (2009) Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder. London: Routledge. Okhaos (n.d.) Plantoid. Available at: <http://okhaos.com/plantoid/>. Accessed 10 December 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piironen, P. and Virtanen, A. (2015) Democratizing the power of finance: A discussion about Robin Hood asset management cooperative with founder Akseli Virtanen. In: Lovink, G., Tkacz, N. and De Vries, P. (eds.) MoneyLab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy. Amsterdam: Institute of Networked Cultures.Google Scholar
Popper, N. (2016) The robots are coming for Wall Street. The New York Times, 25 February. Available at: <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/the-robots-are-coming-for-wall-street.html/>. Accessed 21 March 2016..+Accessed+21+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Rizzo, P. (2015) CFTC defines Bitcoin and digital currencies as commodities. CoinDesk, 17 September. Available at: <http://www.coindesk.com/cftc-ruling-defines-bitcoin-and-digital-currencies-as-commodities/>. Accessed 25 September 2015..+Accessed+25+September+2015.>Google Scholar
Roio, D. (2013) Bitcoin, the end of the taboo on money. Available at: <http://www.dyndy.net/2013/04/bitcoin-ends-the-taboo-on-money/>. Accessed 30 April 2014..+Accessed+30+April+2014.>Google Scholar
Son, H. and Collins, M. (2016) The rich are already using robo-advisers, and that scares banks. Bloomberg.com [Online], 5 February. Available at: <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-05/the-rich-are-already-using-robo-advisers-and-that-scares-banks/>. Accessed 6 February 2016..+Accessed+6+February+2016.>Google Scholar
Sutton, B. and Voon, C. (2016) Panama Papers shed light on the shadowy art market. Hyperallergic, 12 April. Available at: <http://hyperallergic.com/289250/panama-papers-shed-light-on-the-shadowy-art-market/>. Accessed 14 April 2016..+Accessed+14+April+2016.>Google Scholar
Terranova, T. (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Torque and Furtherfield (2016) Artists Re:Thinking the Blockchain. Available at: <http://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/artists-rethinking-the-blockchain?tk=208334da9b174c4145e1fec75e784e1b261ff238/>. Accessed 25 July 2016..+Accessed+25+July+2016.>Google Scholar
Troemel, B. (2013) Athletic aesthetics. The New Inquiry, 10 May. Available at: <http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/athletic-aesthetics/>. Accessed 29 March 2016..+Accessed+29+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Troemel, B., Vierkant, A. and Vickers, B. (2012) Club kids: The social life of artists on Facebook. DIS Magazine. Available at: <http://dismagazine.com/discussion/29786/club-kids-the-social-life-of-artists-on-facebook/>. Accessed 29 January 2014..+Accessed+29+January+2014.>Google Scholar
Velthuis, O. (2014) ArtRank and the flippers: Apocalypse now? Texte Zur Kunst, 96: 35–49.Google Scholar
Vidokle, A. (2010) Art without artists? e-flux, May. Available at: <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/art-without-artists/>. Accessed 25 March 2014..+Accessed+25+March+2014.>Google Scholar
Vierkant, A. (2010) The image-object post-internet. Available at: <http://jstchillin.org/artie/pdf/The_Image_Object_Post-Internet_a4.pdf/>. Accessed 17 January 2012..+Accessed+17+January+2012.>Google Scholar
Watts, R. (2016) Arts budget 2016 doesn't hurt (much) but doesn't heal. ArtsHub Australia, 3 May. Available at: <http://www.artshub.com.au/news-article/news/grants-and-funding/richard-watts/arts-budget-2016-doesnt-hurt-much-but-doesnt-heal-251192/>. Accessed 2 June 2016.. Accessed 2 June 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Watts,+R.+(2016)+Arts+budget+2016+doesn't+hurt+(much)+but+doesn't+heal.+ArtsHub+Australia,+3+May.+Available+at:+.+Accessed+2+June+2016.>Google Scholar