Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:21:06.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bringing structural power back in to sovereign debt analysis - Jerome Roos, Why Not Default? The Political Economy of Sovereign Debt, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2019, 416 pp., £34 (hbk). ISBN 978-0-691-18010-6

Review products

Jerome Roos, Why Not Default? The Political Economy of Sovereign Debt, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2019, 416 pp., £34 (hbk). ISBN 978-0-691-18010-6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

José Tomás Labarca*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, UK
*
Corresponding author: José Tomás Labarca, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, Scotland. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2019 The Author(s)

References

Block, F. (1977) The ruling class does not rule: Notes on the Marxist theory of the state. Socialist Revolution, 33(6): 628.Google Scholar
Cardoso, F.H. and Faletto, E. (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J. and Gersovitz, M. (1981) Debt with potential repudiation: Theoretical and empirical analysis. Review of Economic Studies, 48(2): 289309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar