Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:00:11.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MORBID ADHERENT PLACENTA: PREDICTION, DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT

Part of: Bespoke shallow archive Weizmann

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2007

JM PALACIOS JARAQUEMADA ,
CH BRUNO  and
WA CLAVELLI
JM PALACIOS JARAQUEMADA*
Affiliation:
J.J. Naón Morphologic Institute, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. South Scientific Foundation, Lomas de Zamora; Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Cemic University Hospital, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
CH BRUNO
Affiliation:
South Scientific Foundation, Lomas de Zamora; Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
WA CLAVELLI
Affiliation:
Cemic University Hospital, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
*
Jose M Palacios Jaraquemada, Professor, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, Av. Corrientes 5087 4° A C1414AJD, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Morbid adherent placenta (MAP), also known as placenta accreta, increta or percreta, is one of the main causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Its incidence has noticeably increased in the last few decades, a fact directly related to the increase in caesarean sections. There is a close relation between iterative caesarean sections and MAP. This connection is of vital importance, since caesarean rates have risen worldwide, especially in the countries where there is the possibility of caesarean section on demand.

Type
Research Article
Information
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 357 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003; 52: 1–114.Google Scholar
2Kozak, LJ, Weeks, JD. U.S Trends in obstetric procedures, 1990–2000. Birth 2002; 29: 157–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Finberg, HJ, Williams, JW. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 333–43.Google Scholar
4Chou, MM, Ho, ES, Lu, F, Lee, YH. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa/accreta with color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 293–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Palacios Jaraquemada, JM, Bruno, CH. Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 716–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Catanzarite, VA, Stanco, LM, Schrimmer, DR, Conroy, C. Managing placenta previa/accreta. Contemp Ob Gyn 1996; 41: 66–95.Google Scholar
7Bretelle, F, Courbiere, B, Mazouni, C, Agostini, A, Cravello, L, Boubli, L, et al. Management of placenta accreta: morbidity and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 133: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Palacios Jaraquemada, JM, Pesaresi, M, Nassif, JC, Hermosid, S. Anterior placenta percreta: surgical approach, haemostasis and uterine repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 738–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Miller, DA, Chollet, JA, Goodwin, TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.Google Scholar
10Hung, TH, Shau, WY, Hsieh, CC, Chiu, TH, Hsu, JJ, Hsieh, TT. Risk factors for placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 545–50.Google Scholar
11Ota, Y, Watanabe, H, Fukasawa, I, Tanaka, S, Kawatsu, T, Oishi, A, et al. Placenta accreta/increta. Review of 10 cases and a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 263: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Cravello, L, Agostini, A, Roger, V, Bretelle, F, Blanc, B. Intrauterine pregnancy after thermal balloon ablation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 671.Google Scholar
13Laing Face, C. Ultrasound evaluation of Obstetric Problems relating to the lower uterine segment and cervix. In: Sonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Fifth edition. Appleton & Lange Stamford Connecticut, 1996; 34: 709–27.Google Scholar
14Oyelese, Y, Smulian, JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 927–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Timor Tritsch, IE. Yunis RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patientes suspected placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 742–42.Google Scholar
16Oyelese, Y, Smulian, JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 927–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Hudon, L, Belfort, MA, Broome, DR. Diagnosis and management of placenta percreta: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998; 53: 509–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Comstock, CH. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Haratz-Rubinstein, Natan. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. Contemp Ob Gyn 2002; 4: 116–42.Google Scholar
20Megier, P, Gorin, V, Desroches, A. Ultrasonography of placenta previa at the third trimester of pregnancy: research for signs of placenta accreta/percreta and vasa previa. Prospective color and pulsed Doppler ultrasonography study of 45 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1999; 28: 239–44.Google ScholarPubMed
21Jurkovic, D, Hillaby, K, Woelfer, B, Lawrence, A, Salim, R, Elson, CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 220–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Ben Nagi, J, Ofili-Yebovi, D, Sawyer, E, Aplin, J, Jurkovic, D. Successful treatment of a recurrent Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy by surgical repair of the uterine defect. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 855–56.Google Scholar
23Maldjian, C, Adam, R, Pelosi, M, Pelosi, M 3rd, Rudelli, RD, Maldjian, J. MRI appearance of placenta percreta and placenta accreta. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 965–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Levine, D, Hulka, CA, Ludmir, J, Li, W, Edelman, RR. Placenta accreta: evaluation with color Doppler US, power Doppler US, and MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 205: 773–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Kim, JA, Narra, VR. Magnetic resonance imaging with true fast imaging with steady-state precession and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequences in cases of suspected placenta accreta. Acta Radiol. 2004; 45: 692–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Lax, A, Prince, MR, Mennitt, KW, Schwebach, JR, Budorick, NE. The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25: 87–93.Google Scholar
27Mazouni, C, Gorincour, G, Juhan, V, Bretelle, F. Placenta accreta: a review of current advances in prenatal diagnosis. Placenta 2007; 28: 599–603.Google Scholar
28Kobayashi, T, Terao, T, Maki, M, Ikenoue, T. Diagnosis and management of acute obstetrical DIC. Semin Thromb Hemost 2001; 27: 161–66.Google Scholar
29Lurie, S, Feinstein, M, Mamet, Y. Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in pregnancy: thorough comprehension of etiology and management reduces obstetricians' stress. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2000; 263: 126–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Hong, JY, Jee, YS, Yoon, HJ, Kim, SM. Comparison of general and epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section for placenta previa totalis: maternal haemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12: 12–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Why Mothers Die 2000–2002. Chapter 4: Antepartum And Postpartum Haemorrhage http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/wmd/wmd-04.htmGoogle Scholar
32Burchell, RC. Internal iliac artery ligation: haemodynamics. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 737–39.Google Scholar
33Burchell, RC, Olson, G. Internal iliac artery ligation: aortograms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 94: 117–24.Google Scholar
34Burchell, RC. Physiology of internal iliac artery ligation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1968; 75: 642–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Burchell, RC. Arterial physiology of the human female pelvis. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 31: 855–60.Google Scholar
36Riley, DP, Burgess, RW. External abdominal aortic compression: a study of a resuscitation manoeuvre for postpartum haemorrhage. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994; 22: 571–75.Google Scholar
37Bell-Thomas, SM, Penketh, RJ, Lord, RH, Davies, NJ, Collis, R. Emergency use of a transfemoral aortic occlusion catheter to control massive haemorrhage at caesarean hysterectomy. BJOG 2003; 110: 1120–122.Google Scholar
38de Blok, S, de Vries, C, Prinssen, HM, Blaauwgeers, HL, Jorna-Meijer, LB. Fatal sepsis after uterine artery embolization with microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 779–83.Google Scholar
39Hietala, SO. Urinary bladder necrosis following selective embolization of the internal iliac artery. Acta Radiol Diagn.1978; 19: 316–20.Google Scholar
40Sieber, PR. Bladder necrosis secondary to pelvic artery embolization: case report and literature review. J Urol 1994; 151: 422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41El-Hamamy, E, B-Lynch, C. A worldwide review of the uses of the uterine compression suture techniques as alternative to hysterectomy in the management of severe post-partum haemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 143–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Hofmey, JG. Hypovolaemic shock. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15: 645–62.Google Scholar
43Palacios Jaraquemada, JM, Pesaresi, M, Nassif, JC, Hermosid, S, Sarto, A et al. Aortic cross-clamping in obstetrics. www.obgyn.net/displayarticle.asp?page=/english/pubs/features/POV-aortic_cross. 2001.Google Scholar
44Palacios Jaraquemada, JM. Estudio de la circulación arterial de la pelvis: consideraciones quirúrgicas. [Anatomy study of arterial circulation of the pelvis. Surgical considerations.] Doctorate Thesis (in Spanish). School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 1997.Google Scholar
45Kamani, AA, Gambling, DR, Christilaw, J, Flanagan, ML. Anaesthetic management of patients with placenta accreta. Can J Anaesth 1987; 34: 613–17.Google Scholar
46Leeds and Bradford Pathology Partnership. Blood Transfusion website. Blood Transfusion Safety Guidelines. Chapter 3 – Screening and Crossmatching Procedures http://www.pathology.leedsth.nhs.uk/pathology/ClinicalInfo/ClinicalServices/BloodTranfusionServices/BloodTransfusionSafetyGuidelines/tabid/209/Default.aspx#Chapt6. 2007Google Scholar
47Saverimuttu, J, Greenfield, T, Rotenko, I, Crozier, J, Jalaludin, B, Harvey, M. Implications for urgent transfusion of uncrossmatched blood in the emergency department: The prevalence of clinically significant red cell antibodies within different patient groups. Emerg Med 2003; 15: 239–43.Google Scholar
48Kwee, A, Bots, ML, Visser, GH, Bruinse, HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 187–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Daskalakis, G, Anastasakis, E, Papantoniou, N, Mesogitis, S, Theodora, M, Antsaklis, A. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 223–27.Google Scholar
50Kotwal, SV, Srnath, N, Sood, R, Behra, RC. Placenta percreta invading the bladder causing exsanguinating haemorrhage. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999; 10: 260–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Reynders, FC, Senten, L, Tjalma, W, Jacquemyn, Y. Postpartum haemorrhage: practical approach to a life-threatening complication. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2006; 33: 81–84.Google ScholarPubMed
52Palacios Jaraquemada, JM, García Mónaco, R, Barbosa, NE, Ferle, L, Iriarte, H, Conesa, H. Lower uterine blood supply: Extrauterine anastomotic system and its application in the surgical devascularization techniques. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 228–34.Google Scholar
53El-Shalakany, AH, Nasr El-Din, MH, Wafa, GA, Azzam, ME, El-Dorry, A. Massive vault necrosis with bladder fistula after uterine artery embolisation. BJOG 2003; 110: 215–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Chou, Y-J, Cheng, Y-F, Shen, C-C, Hsu, T-Y, Chang, S-Y, Kung, F-T. Failure of uterine arterial embolization: placenta accreta with profuse postpartum haemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 688–90.Google Scholar
55Zeigler-Johnson, CM, Holmes, JL, Lassila, HC, Sutton-Tyrrell, K, Kuller, LH. Subclinical atherosclerosis in relation to hysterectomy status in black women. Stroke 1998; 29: 759–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Watson, NR, Studd, JW, Garnett, T, Savvas, M, Milligan, P. Bone loss after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 72–77.Google Scholar
57Ravn, P, Lind, C, Nilas, L. Lack of influence of simple premenopausal hysterectomy on bone mass and bone metabolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 891–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Pastore, G, Benedetto, C, Ardizzoja, M, Cavallero, G, Massobrio, M. Statistical study of the risk of cardiovascular disease in hysterectomized patients. Minerva Med 1985; 76: 827–34.Google Scholar
59Luoto, R, Kaprio, J, Reunanen, A, Rutanen, EM. Cardiovascular morbidity in relation to ovarian function after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 515–22.Google Scholar
60Habelt, K, Brosche, T, Riedel, HH. Symptoms of ovarian failure after hysterectomy in premenopausal women. A retrospective study based on postoperative perception of 245 women. Zentralbl Gynakol 1996; 118: 206–12.Google ScholarPubMed
61Payne, JF, Robboy, SJ, Haney, AF. Embolic microspheres within ovarian arterial vasculature after uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 883–86.Google ScholarPubMed
62Wen, J, Wang, XH, Guo, Y, Cui, HZ, Bao, HL, Liu, J, Ma, XQ. Evaluation of clinical effect of hysterectomy preserving the uterine artery. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2006; 41: 745–48.Google Scholar
63Torreblanca Neve, E, Merchan Escalante, G, Walter Tordecillas, MA, Acosta Alfaro, MA. Ligation of the hypogastric arteries. Analysis of 4000 cases. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1993; 61: 242–46.Google Scholar
64Guillot, E, Raynal, P, Fuchs, F, Lepercq, J. Failure of a conservative treatment of a placenta accreta. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2006; 34: 1055–57.Google Scholar
65Legro, RS, Price, FV, Caritis, SN. Successful conservative treatment of placenta percreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1648–49.Google Scholar
66Courbiere, B, Bretelle, F, Porcu, G, Gamerre, M, Blanc, B. Conservative treatment of placenta accreta. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2003; 32: 549–54.Google ScholarPubMed
67Palacios Jaraquemada, JM, Monge, F, Paesani, F. One step conservative surgery in anterior placenta percreta by Pfannenstiel incision. http://www.obgyn.net/hysterectomy-alternatives/hysterectomyalternatives.asp?page=articles/jaraquemada_placenta-percreta 2007.Google Scholar
68Crespo, R, Lapresta, M, Madani, B. Conservative treatment of placenta increta with methotrexate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 91: 162–63.Google Scholar
69Chiang, YC, Shih, JC, Lee, CN. Septic shock after conservative management for placenta accreta. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 45: 64–66.Google Scholar
70Habek, D, Becarevic, R. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center: 8-year evaluation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22: 139–42.Google Scholar
71Bazsa, S. Transcatheter embolization of the hypogastric artery as a hemostatic method in obstetrics and gynecology. Orv Hetil 1994; 135: 2867–69.Google Scholar
72Samama, CM, Albaladejo, P, Benhamou, D, Bertin-Maghit, M, Bruder, N, Doublet, JD, et al. Committee for Good Practice Standards of the French Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (SFAR).Venous thromboembolism prevention in surgery and obstetrics: clinical practice guidelines. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 95–116.Google Scholar