Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T23:30:24.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: features of the stimulus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Robert M Abrams ,
Kenneth J Gerhardt ,
Douglas S Richards  and
Aemil JM Peters
Robert M Abrams*
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, USA Communiction Processes and Disorders, Pediatrics, University of Florida, USA
Kenneth J Gerhardt
Affiliation:
Communication Processes and Disorders, University of Florida, USA.
Douglas S Richards
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, USA
Aemil JM Peters
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Robert M Abrams PhD, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PO Box 100294, Gainesville, FL 32610–0294, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fetal reactivity to acoustic stimulation is a long-recognized phenomenon. Obstetrical interest in this phenomenon is usually considered to have begun with peiper’s report in 1925 of marked fetal movements following a pulsed, loud sound. Occasional attention to the subject was given in the subsequent five decades. Read and Miller are often credited with writing the first comprehensive clinical study of the usefulness of acoustic stimulation in evaluating fetal health. A clear finding in this study was the correlation between an abnormal contraction stress test and faliure of the fetus to respond to stimulation.

Type
Articles
Information
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 87 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Peiper, A. Sinnesempfindungen des Kindes vor seiner Geburt. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 1925; 29: 236–41.Google Scholar
2Forbes, HS, Forbes, HB. Fetal sense reaction: hearing. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1927; 7: 373–75.Google Scholar
3Ray, WS. A preliminary study of fetal conditioning. Child Dev 1932; 3: 173–77.Google Scholar
4Sontag, LW, Wallace, RF. Study of fetal activity. Preliminary report of the Fels fund. Am J Disabled Child 1934; 48: 1050–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Sontag, LW, Wallace, RF. The movement response of the human fetus to sound stimuli. Child Dev 1937; 6: 253–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Sontag, LW, Wallace, RF. Changes in the rate of the human fetal heart in response to vibratory stimuli. Am J Dis Child 1936; 51: 583–89.Google Scholar
7Bernard, J, Sontag, LW. Fetal reactivity to tonal stimulation: a preliminary report. J Genet Psychol 1947; 70: 205–10.Google ScholarPubMed
8Dwornicka, B, Jasienska, A, Smolarz, W, Wawryk, R. Attempt of determining the fetal reaction to acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol Stockh 1964; 57: 571–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Johansson, B, Wedenberg, E, Westin, B. Measurement of tone response by the human foetus. Acta Otolaryngol Stockh 1964; 57: 188–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Goodlin, RC, Schmidt, W. Human fetal arousal levels as indicated by heart rate recordings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 114: 613–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Murphy, KP, Smyth, CN. Response of fetus to auditory stimulation. Lancet 1962; 1: 972–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Read, JA, Miller, FC. Fetal heart rate acceleration in response to acoustic stimulation as a measure of fetal wellbeing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 129: 512–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Serafini, P, Lindsay, MBJ, Nagey, DA, Pupkin, MJ, Tseng, P, Crenshaw, C. Antepartum heart rate response to sound stimulation: the acoustic stimulation test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 41–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Smith, CV, Phelan, JP, Paul, RH, Broussard, P. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing: a retrospective experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 567–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Visser, GHA, Mulder, HH, Wit, HP, Mulder, EJH, Prechtl, HFR. Vibro-acoustic stimulation of the human fetus: effect on behavioral state organization. Early Hum Dev 1989; 19: 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Pujol, R, Lavigne-Rebillard, M, Uziel, A. Physiological correlates of development of the human cochlea. Sem Perinatol 1990; 14: 275–80.Google ScholarPubMed
17Gagnon, R. Stimulation of human fetuses with sound and vibration. Sem Perinatol 1989; 13: 393–402.Google ScholarPubMed
18Richards, DS. The fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: an update. Sem Perinatol 1990; 14: 305–10.Google ScholarPubMed
19Visser, GHA, Mulder, EJH. The effect of vibro-acoustic stimulation on fetal behavioral state. Am J Indust Med 1993; 23: 531–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Gelman, SR, Wood, S, Spellacy, WN, Abrams, RM. Fetal movements in response to sound stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 484–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Gagnon, R, Foreman, J, Hunse, C, Patrick, J. Effects of low-frequency vibration on human term fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1479–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Leader, LR, Baillie, P, Martin, P, Vermeulen, E. The assessment and significance of habituation to a repeated stimulus by the human fetus. Early Hum Dev 1982; 7: 211–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Leader, LR, Stevens, AD, Lumbers, ER. Measurement of fetal responses to vibroacoustic stimuli: habituation in fetal sheep. Biol Neonate 1988; 53: 73–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Kisilevsky, BS, Muir, DW. Human fetal and subsequent newborn responses to sound and vibration. Infant Behav Dev 1991; 14: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Yao, QW, Jakobsson, J, Nyman, M, Rabaeus, M, Till, O, Westgren, M. Fetal responses to different intensity levels of vibroacoustic stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 206–209.Google ScholarPubMed
26Nyman, M, Arulkumaran, S, Hsu, TS, Ratnam, SS, Till, O, Westgren, M. Vibroacoustic stimulation and intrauterine sound pressure levels. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 803–806.Google Scholar
27Birnholz, JC, Benacerraf, BR. The development of fetal hearing. Science 1983; 222: 516–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Blom, ED. The artifical larynx: past and present. In: Salmon, SJ, Goldstein, LP eds. The artifical larynx handbook. New York: Grune and Stratton Inc, 1978.Google Scholar
29Peters, AJM, Abrams, RM. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: vibrator response characteristics in pregnant sheep postmortem. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 181–84.Google ScholarPubMed
30Pietrantoni, M, Angel, JL, Parsons, MT, McClain, L, Arango, HA, Spellacy, WN. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 807–11.Google ScholarPubMed
31Gagnon, R, Benzaquen, S, Hunse, C. The fetal sound environment during vibroacoustic stimulation in labor: effect on fetal heart rate response. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 950–55.Google ScholarPubMed
32Gagnon, R, Patrick, J, Foreman, J, West, R. Stimulation of human fetuses with sound and vibration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 848–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Kisilevsky, BS, Muir, DW, Low, JA. Human fetal responses to sound as a function of stimulus intensity. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 971–76.Google ScholarPubMed
34Lecanuet, JP, Granier-Deferre, C, Jacquet, AY, Busnel, MC. Decelerative cardiac response to acoustical stimulation in the near term fetus. Quart J Exp Psychol 1992; 44B: 279–303.Google Scholar
35Fifer, WP, Moon, C. Psychobiology of newborn auditory preferences. Sem Perinatol 1989; 13: 430–33.Google ScholarPubMed
36Abrams, RM. Third international conference on sound and vibration in pregnancy: women at work. Am J Indust Med 1993; 23: 527–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Peters, AJM, Abrams, RM, Gerhardt, KJ, Burchfield, DJ. Vibration of the abdomen in non-pregnant sheep: effect of dynamic force and surface area of vibrator. J Low Freq Noise Vib 1991; 10: 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Graham, EM, Peters, AJM, Abrams, RM, Gerhardt, KJ, Burchfield, DJ. Intra-abdominal sound levels during vibroacoustic stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1140–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Gerhardt, KJ. Characteristics of the fetal sheep sound environment. Sem Perinatol 1989; 13: 362–70.Google Scholar
40Gerhardt, KJ, Abrams, RM, Kovaz, BM, Gomez, KJ, Conlon, M. Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewes by sound applied to the abdomen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Richards, DS, Abrams, RM, Gerhardt, KJ, McCann, ME. Effects of vibration frequency and tissue thickness on intrauterine sound levels in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 438–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Peters, AJM, Abrams, RM, Gerhardt, KJ, Longmate, JA. Three dimensional sound and vibration frequency responses of the sheep abdomen. J Low Freq Noise Vib 1991; 10: 100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Bench, J. Sound transmission to the human foetus through the maternal abdominal wall. J Genet Psychol 1968; 133: 85–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Grimwade, JC, Walker, DC, Wood, C. Sensory stimulation of the fetus. Aust J Ment Ret 1970; 2: 63–64.Google Scholar
45Walker, D, Grimwade, J, Wood, C. Intrauterine noise: a component of the fetal environment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 109: 91–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Gerhardt, KJ, Abrams, RM, Oliver, CC. Sound environment of the fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 282–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Vince, MA, Armitage, SE, Baldwin, SA, Toner, J, Moore, BCJ. The sound environment of the foetal sheep. Behavior 1982; 81: 296–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Richards, DS, Frentzen, B, Gerhardt, KJ, McCann, ME, Abrams, RM. Sound Levels in the human uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 186–90.Google Scholar
49Gerhardt, KJ, Otto, R, Abrams, RM, Colle, JJ, Burchfield, DJ, Peters, AJM. Cochlear microphonics recorded from fetal and newborn sheep. Am J Otolaryngol 1992; 13: 226–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Peters, AJM, Abrams, RM, Gerhardt, KJ, Longmate, JA. Three dimensional intra-abdominal sound pressures in sheep produced by airborne stimuli. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1304–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Smith, CV, Satt, B, Phelan, JP, Paul, RH. Intrauterine sound levels: intrapartum assessment with an intrauterine microphone. Am J Perinatol 1990; 7: 312–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Arulkumaran, S, Talbert, D, Hsu, TS, Chua, S, Anandakumar, C, Ratnam, SS. In-utero sound levels when vibroacoustic stimulation is applied to the maternal abdomen: an assessment of the possibility of cochlea damage in the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar