Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:42:05.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FETAL NEUROIMAGING

Part of: Bespoke shallow archive Weizmann

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

R.K. POOH  and
K.H. POOH
R.K. POOH*
Affiliation:
CRIFM Clinical Research Institute of Fetal Medicine PMC, Osaka, Japan.
K.H. POOH
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Kagawa National Children's Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
*
Ritsuko K Pooh, MD, PhD, CRIFM Clinical Research Institute of Fetal Medicine PMC, 3–7, Uehommachi 7 Chome, Tennoji, Osaka #543–0001, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Imaging technologies have been remarkably improved and contribute to prenatal evaluation of fetal central nervous system (CNS) development and assessment of CNS abnormalities in utero.

Type
Research Article
Information
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 1 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Timor-Tritsch, IE, Peisner, DB, Raju, S. Sonoembryology: an organ-oriented approach using a high-frequency vaginal probe. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18: 286–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Pooh, RK. B-mode and Doppler studies of the abnormal fetus in the first trimester. In: Chervenak, FA, Kurjak, A (eds). Fetal medicine. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth 1999; 46–51,Google Scholar
3Timor-Tritsch, IE, Monteagudo, A. Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Monteagudo, A, Reuss, ML, Timor-Tritsch, IE. Imaging the fetal brain in the second and third trimesters using transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 27–32.Google ScholarPubMed
5Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Moomjy, M. In utero detection of ventriculomegaly during the second and third trimesters by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 193–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE. Development of fetal gyri, sulci and fissures: a transvaginal sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 222–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Pooh, RK, Nakagawa, Y, Nagamachi, N, Pooh, KH, Nakagawa, Y, Maeda, K et al. Transvaginal sonography of the fetal brain: detection of abnormal morphology and circulation. Croat Med J 1998; 39: 147–57.Google ScholarPubMed
8Pooh, RK, Maeda, K, Pooh, KH, Kurjak, A. Sonographic assessment of the fetal brain morphology. Prenat Neonat Med 1999; 4: 18–38.Google Scholar
9Pooh, RK. Two-dimensional and three dimensional Doppler antiography in fetal brain circulation. In: Kurjak, A (ed). Power Doppler in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth 1999; 105–111.Google Scholar
10Pooh, RK, Pooh, KH, Nakagawa, Y, Nishida, S, Ohno, Y. Clinical application of three-dimensional ultrasound in fetal brain assessment. Croat Med J 2000; 41: 245–51.Google ScholarPubMed
11Timor-Tritsch, IE, Monteagudo, A, Mayberry, P. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the fetal brain: the three horn view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 302–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Mayberry, P. Three-dimensional transvaginal neurosonography of the fetal brain: ‘navigating’ in the volume scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 16: 307–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Pooh, RK, Nagao, Y, Pooh, KH. Fetal neuroimaging by transvaginal 3D ultrasound and MRI. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2006; 6: 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Pooh, RK, Pooh, KH. Fetal neuroimaging with new technology. Ultrasound Review Obstet Gynecol 2002; 2: 178–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Blaas, HG, Eik-Nes, SH, Kiserud, T, Berg, S, Angelsen, B, Olstad, B. Three-dimensional imaging of the brain cavities in human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 228–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Blaas, HG, Eik-Nes, SH, Berg, S, Torp, H. In-vivo three-dimensional ultrasound reconstructions of embryos and early fetuses. Lancet 1998; 352: 1182–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Pooh, RK. Fetal Brain Assessment by Three-Dimensional Ultrasound. In: Kurjak, A, Kupesic, S (eds). Clinical Application Of 3D Sonography. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 2000: 171–79.Google Scholar
18Pooh, RK, Pooh, KH. Transvaginal 3D and Doppler ultrasonography of the fetal brain. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 38–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Pooh, RK, Pooh, KH. The assessment of fetal brain morphology and circulation by transvaginal 3D sonography and power Doppler. J Perinat Med 2002; 30: 48–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Endres, LK, Cohen, L. Reliability and validity of three-dimensional fetal brain volumes. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 1265–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Roelfsema, NM, Hop, WC, Boito, SM, Wladimiroff, JW. Three-dimensional sonographic measurement of normal fetal brain volume during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 275–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Pooh, RK, Aono, T. Transvaginal power Doppler angiography of the fetal brain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 417–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Pooh, RK. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional Doppler angiography in fetal brain circulation. In: Kurjak, A (ed). 3D Power Doppler in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth 1999: 105–11Google Scholar
24Pooh, RK, Maeda, K, Pooh, KH. An Atlas of Fetal Central Nervous System Disease. Diagnosis and Management. Parthenon CRC Press, London, New York, 2003; 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Alagappan, R, Browning, PD, Laorr, A, McGahan, JP. Distal lateral ventricular atrium: reevaluation of normal range. Radiology 1994; 193: 405–408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Almog, B, Gamzu, R, Achiron, R, Fainaru, O, Zalel, Y. Fetal lateral ventricular width: what should be its upper limit? A prospective cohort study and reanalysis of the current and previous data. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 39–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Pooh, RK, Pooh, KH, Nakagawa, Y, Maeda, K, Fukui, R, Aono, T. Transvaginal Doppler assessment of fetal intracranial venous flow. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 697–701.Google ScholarPubMed
28Kelly, EN, Allen, VM, Seaward, G, Windrim, R, Ryan, G. Mild ventriculomegaly in the fetus, natural history, associated findings and outcome of isolated mild ventriculomegaly: a literature review. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 697–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Goldstein, I, Copel, JA, Makhoul, IR. Mild cerebral ventriculomegaly in fetuses: characteristics and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20: 281–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Pilu, G, Falco, P, Gabrielli, S, Perolo, A, Sandri, F, Bovicelli, L. The clinical significance of fetal isolated cerebral borderline ventriculomegaly: report of 31 cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 320–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Signorelli, M, Tiberti, A, Valseriati, D, Molin, E, Cerri, V, Groli, C et al. Width of the fetal lateral ventricular atrium between 10 and 12 mm: a simple variation of the norm? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Ouahba, J, Luton, D, Vuillard, E, Garel, C, Gressens, P, Blanc, N et al. Prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly: outcome in 167 cases. BJOG 2006; 113: 1072–1079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Pooh, RK, Pooh, KH. Fetal Ventriculomegaly. J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 2: 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Pilu, G, Porelo, A, Falco, P, Visentin, A. Median anomalies of the brain. In: Timor-Tritsch, IE, Monteagudo A, Cohen HL (eds). Ultrasonography of the prenatal and neonatal brain. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001; 259–76.Google Scholar
35Volpe, JJ. Neural tube formation and prosencephalic development. Neurology of the Newborn (4th ed) Philadelphia, WB Saunders. 2001; 3–44.Google Scholar
36Biggio, JR Jr, Wenstrom, KD, Owen, J. Fetal open spina bifida: a natural history of disease progression in utero. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 287–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S, Gabbe, SG, Guidetti, R. Ultrasound screening for spina bifida: cranial and cerebellar signs. Lancet 1986; 12: 72– 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38D'Addario, V, Pinto, V, Del Bianco, A, Di Naro, E, Tartagni, M, Miniello, G et al. The clivus-supraocciput angle: a useful measurement to evaluate the shape and size of the fetal posterior fossa and to diagnose Chiari II malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 146–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Barkovich, AJ, Kjos, BO, Normal, D et al. Revised classification of the posterior fossa cysts and cystlike malformations based on the results of multiplanar MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 977–88.Google Scholar
40Schwarzler, P, Homfray, T, Bernard, JP, Bland, JM, Ville, Y. Late onset microcephaly: failure of prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 640–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Volpe, JJ. Neuronal proliferation, migration, organization and myelination. Neurology of the newborn. 4th edition. WB Saunders, USA, 2001; 45–99.Google Scholar
42Kobayashi, K, Nakahori, Y, Miyake, M, Matsumura, K, Kondo-Iida, E, Nomura, Y et al. An ancient retrotransposal insertion causes Fukuyama-type congenital muscular dystrophy. Nature 1998; 23: 388–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43McGahan, JP, Grix, A, Gerscovich, EO. Prenatal diagnosis of lissencephaly: Miller-Dieker syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22: 560–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Greco, P, Resta, M, Vimercati, A, Dicuonzo, F, Loverro, G, Vicino, M et al. Antenatal diagnosis of isolated lissencephaly by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 276–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Kojima, K, Suzuki, Y, Seki, K, Yamamoto, T, Sato, T, Tanaka, T et al. Prenatal diagnosis of lissencephaly (type II) by ultrasound and fast magnetic resonance imaging. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002; 17: 34–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE. Fetal Neurosonography of congenital brain anomalies. In: Timor-Tritsch, IE, Monteagudo, A, Cohen, HL (eds). Ultrasonography of the prenatal and neonatal brain. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001; 151–258.Google Scholar
47Barkovich, AJ, Simon, EM, Walsh, CA. Callosal agenesis with cyst: a better understanding and new classification. Neurology 2001; 23: 220–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Bretelle, F, Senat, MV, Bernard, JP, Hillion, Y, Ville, Y. First-trimester diagnosis of fetal arachnoid cyst: prenatal implication. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 400–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Volpe, JJ. Brain tumors and vein of Galen malformation. Neurology of the Newborn, 4th edition, Philadelphia; WB Saunders, 2001; 841–56.Google Scholar
50Wakai, S, Arai, T, Nagai, M. Congenital brain tumors. Surg Neurol 1984; 21: 597–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Sherer, DM, Abramowicz, JS, Eggers, PC, Metlay, LA, Sinkin, RA, Woods, JR Jr. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of intracranial teratoma and massive craniomegaly with associated high-output cardiac failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 97–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Pooh, RK, Nakagawa, Y, Pooh, KH, Nakagawa, Y, Nagamachi, N. Fetal craniofacial structure and intracranial morphology in a case of Apert syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 274–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Benacerraf, BR, Spiro, R, Mitchell, AG. Using three-dimensional ultrasound to detect craniosynostosis in a fetus with Pfeiffer syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 391–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Faro, C, Chaoui, R, Wegrzyn, P, Levaillant, JM, Benoit, B, Nicolaides, KH. Metopic suture in fetuses with Apert syndrome at 22–27 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Lasjaunias, PL, Chng, SM, Sachet, M, Alvarez, H, Rodesch, G, Garcia-Monaco, R. The management of vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: S184–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Tart, RP, Quisling, RG. Curvilinear and tubulonodular varieties of lipoma of the corpus callosum: an MR and CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 805–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Demaerel, P, Van de Gaer, P, Wilms, G, Baert, AL. Interhaemispheric lipoma with variable callosal dysgenesis: relationship between embryology, morphology, and symptomatology. Eur Radiol 1996; 6: 904–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Ickowitz, V, Eurin, D, Rypens, F, Sonigo, P, Simon, I, David, P et al. Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal follow-up of pericallosal lipoma: report of seven new cases. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 767–72.Google ScholarPubMed
59Jeanty, P, Zaleski, W, Fleischer, AC. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of lipoma of the corpus callosum in a fetus with Goldenhar syndrome. Am J Perinatol 1991; 8: 89–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60Malinger, G, Ben-Sira, L, Lev, D, Ben-Aroya, Z, Kidron, D, Lerman-Sagie, T. Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 333–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Sherer, DM, Anyaegbunam, A, Onyeije, C. Antepartum fetal intracranial hemorrhage, predisposing factors and prenatal sonography: a review. Am J Perinatol 1998; 15: 431–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Eller, KM, Kuller, JA. Porencephaly secondary to fetal trauma during amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 865–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63Moinuddin, A, McKinstry, RC, Martin, KA, Neil, JJ. Intracranial hemorrhage progressing to porencephaly as a result of congenitally acquired cytomegalovirus infection–an illustrative report. Prenat Diagn 2003: 23: 797–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64Meizner, I, Elchalal, U. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of anterior fossa porencephaly. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24: 96–99.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65de Laveaucoupet, J, Audibert, F, Guis, F, Rambaud, C, Suarez, B, Boithias-Guerot, C et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of ischemic brain injury. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 729–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed