Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Fischer, Angela
LaCoursiere, D Yvette
Barnard, Peter
Bloebaum, Lois
and
Varner, Michael
2005.
Differences Between Hospitals in Cesarean Rates for Term Primigravidas With Cephalic Presentation.
Obstetrics & Gynecology,
Vol. 105,
Issue. 4,
p.
816.
Denk, Charles E.
Kruse, Lakota K.
and
Jain, Neetu J.
2006.
Surveillance of Cesarean Section Deliveries, New Jersey, 1999–2004.
Birth,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
203.
Varner, Michael W.
2007.
Management of High‐Risk Pregnancy.
p.
382.
Calvo Pérez, Andrés
Cabeza Vengoechea, Pedro J.
Campillo Artero, Carlos
and
Agüera Ortiz, Javier
2007.
Idoneidad de las indicaciones de cesárea. Una aplicación en la gestión de la práctica clínica.
Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 10,
p.
584.
2007.
Speakers' abstracts.
Journal of Perinatal Medicine,
Vol. 35,
Issue. ,
Stanton, Cynthia
and
Ronsmans, Carine
2008.
Recommendations for Routine Reporting on Indications for Cesarean Delivery in Developing Countries.
Birth,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3,
p.
204.
Brennan, Donal
Murphy, Martina
Robson, Michael
and
O'Herlihy, Colm
2008.
224: Validation of comparative international cesarean delivery rates using ten-group analysis.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vol. 199,
Issue. 6,
p.
S73.
Kushtagi, P
and
Guruvare, S
2008.
Documenting indications for cesarean deliveries.
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 1,
p.
52.
Foley, M
2009.
Induction of labour.
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
462.
CALVO, ANDRÉS
CAMPILLO, CARLOS
JUAN, MIGUEL
ROIG, CATALINA
HERMOSO, JUAN CARLOS
and
CABEZA, PEDRO J.
2009.
Effectiveness of a multifaceted strategy to improve the appropriateness of cesarean sections.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 7,
p.
842.
van Dillen, Jeroen
Diesch, Marijn
Schutte, Joke
Zwart, Joost
Wolterbeek, Ron
and
van Roosmalen, Jos
2009.
Comparing grades of urgency for classification of cesarean delivery.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,
Vol. 107,
Issue. 1,
p.
16.
2009.
Proactive Support of Labor.
p.
241.
Brennan, Donal J.
Robson, Michael S.
Murphy, Martina
and
O'Herlihy, Colm
2009.
Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vol. 201,
Issue. 3,
p.
308.e1.
Brennan, Donal J.
and
Robson, Michael S.
2009.
Nulliparous term singleton vertex caesarean delivery rates.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vol. 200,
Issue. 5,
p.
e8.
Kinsella, S. M.
and
Scrutton, M. J. L.
2009.
Assessment of a modified four-category classification of urgency of caesarean section.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
110.
2009.
Proactive Support of Labor.
p.
248.
HOWELL, Stuart
JOHNSTON, Trisha
and
MACLEOD, Sue‐Lynne
2009.
Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997–2006.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 6,
p.
606.
Betrán, Ana P
Gulmezoglu, A Metin
Robson, Michael
Merialdi, Mario
Souza, João P
Wojdyla, Daniel
Widmer, Mariana
Carroli, Guillermo
Torloni, Maria R
Langer, Ana
Narváez, Alberto
Velasco, Alejandro
Faúndes, Anibal
Acosta, Arnaldo
Valladares, Eliette
Romero, Mariana
Zavaleta, Nelly
Reynoso, Sofia
and
Bataglia, Vicente
2009.
WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections.
Reproductive Health,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
Coonrod, Dean V.
Manriquez, Maria
and
Drachman, David
2009.
Reply.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vol. 200,
Issue. 5,
p.
e8.
Allen, Victoria M.
Baskett, Thomas F.
and
O’Connell, Colleen M.
2010.
Contribution of Select Maternal Groups to Temporal Trends in Rates of Caesarean Section.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 7,
p.
633.