Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T01:27:04.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exercise Mediates Noncoding RNAs in Cardiovascular Diseases: Pathophysiological Roles and Clinical Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2024

Changyong Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Xiaocui Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China
Lu Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Huang Sun*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Suli Bao
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Haojie Li
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Lihui Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Huiling Zeng
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Ruijie Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Yunzhu Peng*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
*
Corresponding authors: Yunzhu Peng, Ruijie Li and Huang Sun; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Corresponding authors: Yunzhu Peng, Ruijie Li and Huang Sun; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Corresponding authors: Yunzhu Peng, Ruijie Li and Huang Sun; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is effective in improving cardiovascular disease risk factor management, cardiopulmonary function, and quality of life. However, the precise mechanisms underlying exercise-induced cardioprotection remain elusive. Recent studies have shed light on the beneficial functions of noncoding RNAs in either exercise or illness models, but only a limited number of noncoding RNAs have been studied in both contexts. Hence, the present study aimed to elucidate the pathophysiological implications and molecular mechanisms underlying the association among exercise, noncoding RNAs, and cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, the present study analysed the most effective and personalized exercise prescription, serving as a valuable reference for guiding the clinical implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have remained the most common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide for over a decade, suggesting that innovative approaches are urgently needed to fight these major public health problems (Ref. Reference Tsao1). Both the guidelines on the secondary prevention of CVDs and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) state that exercise, as a central element, is an effective nonpharmacological and nontraumatic intervention (Refs. Reference Arnett2Reference Pelliccia4). Increasing studies have shown that regular exercise training (ET) reduces cardiovascular risk factors, including the promotion of weight loss, control of blood pressure, improvement of hyperlipidaemia, and insulin sensitivity (Refs. Reference Stamatakis5Reference Dunstan7. Moreover, exercise-based CR is effective in improving exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary function, cardiovascular symptoms, adverse events, and quality of life in patients with hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), valvular heart disease, and heart failure (HF) (Refs. Reference Thomas8Reference Hu10). Although strong and compelling evidence supporting the benefits of exercise has increased over the past years, its complex molecular mechanisms remain obscure.

Increasing research interest has been focused on the pathological processes of exercise-induced cardioprotection (EIC), including the inflammatory response, myocardial oxidative stress, cardiac hypertrophy, vascular remodelling, myocardial metabolic adaptations in mitochondrial function and glucose/lipid metabolism, and systemic responses (Ref. Reference Chen11). From a molecular standpoint, there is a limited understanding of the signalling pathways responsible for these processes. Similarly, translating insights from CVD research into clinical applications, such as warnings and controls of exercise risk, has been challenging. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been recognized as a regulatory network governing gene expression in multiple pathophysiological processes, such as epigenetic, transcriptional, and posttranscriptional levels (Refs. Reference Gomes12, Reference Correia13). However, little is known about the expression and function of these ncRNAs in response to exercise and how they benefit cardiovascular health.

The presented review aimed to summarize the most recent publications on the pathophysiological mechanism of ncRNAs in EIC, discuss potential therapeutic strategies and propose considerations regarding the present and future of research in this field.

Beneficial effects of ET for cardiovascular diseases

An accumulating number of cohort studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have documented that ET has multiple beneficial effects for patients with CVDs, such as improving cardiac structure and function, reducing hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, extending life expectancy (Refs.Reference Chaput14Reference Wen16). A meta-analysis has suggested that achieving the recommended physical activity levels (150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week) can reduce CVD incidence by 17%, CVD mortality by 23%, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence by 26% (Ref.Reference Wahid17). Compared to an unhealthy diet and inactivity (UDI), a prospective cohort study has revealed that the reduction in all-cause and CVD mortality is associated with the following lifestyles: a healthy diet and activity (HDA); a healthy diet but inactivity (HDI); an unhealthy diet but activity (UDA) (Ref. Reference Kazemi18). However, Kivimäki and colleagues (Ref. Reference Kivimäki19) demonstrated that physical inactivity is associated with a 24% high risk of CHD, a 16% enhanced risk of stroke, and a 42% higher risk of T2DM. The frequency of adverse cardiovascular events in acute endurance runners is equivalent to that in a population with a diagnosis of CHD (Ref. Reference Nystoriak and Bhatnagar20). Extreme endurance exercise may induce adverse cardiorenal interactions (Ref. Reference Burtscher21). Currently, ET has been prescribed as a medical therapy for different CVDs. In the following section, we will discuss the potential protective effects of ET in CVDs in detail (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Protective effects of exercise rehabilitation in CVDs. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation plays a significant role in the pathophysiological evolution of cardiovascular health, including reducing myocardial oxidative stress and the inflammatory response, improving microvascular dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis, and promoting cardiac metabolism, physiological hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte proliferation. These benefits may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular complications, the rehospitalization rate, and mortality. VCAM1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; LOX-1, lectin-like oxidized LDL-receptor-1.

ET reduces myocardial oxidative stress

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), both as subcellular messengers in signal transduction pathways and as contributors to oxidative stress, play beneficial or deleterious roles in the initiation, development, and outcomes of CVDs. The main sources of ROS at the cardiac level are the mitochondrial electron transport chain, xanthine oxidase, NADPH oxidases (more specifically that of NOX5), and nitric oxide (NO) synthase (Ref. Reference Dubois-Deruy22). Under physiological conditions, producing a low level of ROS is equivalent to detoxification, and it plays a pivotal role in cellular signalling and function. This process, termed redox signalling, is defined as the specific and reversible oxidation/reduction modification of cellular signalling components for the regulation of gene expression, excitation-contraction coupling, cell growth, migration, differentiation, and death (Ref. Reference Dubois-Deruy22). In contrast, in pathological situations, ROS causes oxidative modification of major cellular macromolecules (such as lipids, proteins, or DNA) in subcellular organelles, including mitochondria, the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and the nucleus. However, this response leads to atherosclerosis, endothelial and mitochondrial dysfunction, increased blood pressure, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (Ref. Reference Zalba and Moreno23).

Not surprisingly, numerous randomized clinical trials investigating antioxidants have been negative, whereas targeting mitochondria will be a promising strategy to improve mitochondrial functionality by nonpharmacological methods, including exercise. In the past few decades, ET has been developed into an established evidence-based treatment strategy for CVDs (Refs. Reference Thomas8, Reference Bull24). A previous study in a mouse model has demonstrated that ET increases endothelial sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) levels and reduces the downregulation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (NRF2), and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1). ET protects against cardiac damage by inducing hyperlipidaemia-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis (Ref. Reference Pei25). Additional studies in patients with CHD have demonstrated that regular moderate ET attenuates cardiac oxidative stress by decreasing protein carbonyl, SOD, and GSH-Px, as well as increasing GSH and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) levels (Refs. Reference Taty Zau26, Reference Tofas27). Additionally, oxidative stress is associated with the expression of ncRNAs (Refs. Reference Minjares28, Reference Iantomasi29). Masoumi-Ardakani and colleagues (Ref. Reference Masoumi-Ardakani30) elucidated that ET improves cardiac function in hypertensive individuals by increasing total serum antioxidant capacity, which is related to reduced microRNA-21 (miR-21) and miR-222 levels. Knockdown of lncRNA SNHG8 in MI mice reduces myocardial infarction (MI) size and alleviates myocardial tissue injury and oxidative stress (Ref. Reference Tang31). Similarly, lncRNA NORAD overexpression attenuates doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiac pathological lesions by decreasing cardiomyocyte apoptosis and mitochondrial ROS levels (Ref. Reference Guan32). However, further mechanisms of ROS and ncRNAs in ET-induced CVDs remain to be understood.

ET blunts inflammatory pathways

The inflammatory response is an equivocal topic in cardiovascular protection. It is well known that inflammation is involved in the development and progression of CVDs, such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, CHD, and rheumatic heart disease, and it provokes cardiomyocyte damage. Importantly, ET halts the action of inflammatory mediators and the induction of biological pathways to protect the heart (Refs. Reference Metsios33Reference Crea35). For instance, ET affects macrophage function, including downregulation of the interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and nuclear factor (NF)-κB inflammatory cytokines, as well as reducing oxidized LDL and improving antioxidant capacity to blunt the processes of atherosclerosis (Ref. Reference Metsios33). Evidence from a human study shows that aerobic training is beneficial for blood pressure control and CVD risk reduction by decreasing endothelin-1 and the C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and lectin-like oxidized LDL-receptor-1 inflammatory markers (Ref. Reference Boeno36). A systemic review and meta-analysis have demonstrated that ET reduces CRP, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentrations in CHD subjects (Ref. Reference Thompson37). Nonetheless, further animal and clinical studies with high methodological qualities and large sample sizes are needed to improve evidence-based medicine in this area and to explore the underlying molecular mechanism of different exercise mode-induced inflammation reduction in more CVDs.

NcRNAs play regulatory roles in inflammation and innate immune responses. The expression of lncRNA INKILN is downregulated in contractile vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) but induced in human atherosclerotic vascular diseases (ASVDs) and aortic aneurysms. Knockdown of lncRNA INKILN by siRNA attenuates the expression of a series of proinflammatory genes by blocking IL-1β-induced nuclear localization and the physical interaction between p65 and megakaryocytic leukaemia 1 (MKL1), which is a major transcriptional activator of vascular inflammation (Ref. Reference Zhang38). MiR-15a-5p and miR-199a-3p overexpression decreases inflammatory pathway protein levels, such as IKKα, IKKβ, and p65, and it reduces oxidized LDL and NF-κB activation in VSMCs and patients with atherosclerosis (Ref. Reference González-López39). Moreover, overexpression of miR-340-5p reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis and inflammation via the HMGB1/TLR4/ NF-κB pathway in myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury (MIRI) (Ref. Reference Long40).

ET optimizes cardiac metabolism

Cardiac metabolism represents a crucial and significant bridge between health and CVDs. The predisposing factors of CVDs, such as insulin resistance, DM, and obesity, are associated with imbalances in cardiac mitochondrial dynamics, mitochondrial fusion and fission, mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction, and mitophagy (Refs. Reference Fajardo41, Reference Li42). The heart is an important energy-consuming organ, accounting for approximately 30%–40% of mitochondria by volume of cardiomyocytes. Under physiological baseline conditions, the heart is considered an omnivore organ because it uses broad energy substrates. Cardiac ATP is mainly produced from fatty acid oxidative phosphorylationglucose oxidative phosphorylationlactateand other energy sources, including pyruvate, pyruvate, acetate, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs). However, under pathological conditions, such as MI, myocarditis, and HF, cardiometabolic substrates switch from major fatty acid oxidation to carbohydrate oxidation (Ref. Reference Ritterhoff and Tian43), because glycolysis consumes less oxygen than fatty acid oxidation and the oxidative phosphorylation products, namely, water and carbon dioxide, are nontoxic to the heart.

Compared to pathological conditions, cardiac workload and myocardial oxygen consumption markedly increase during ET, leading to an increased rate of ATP generation by increasing the use of fatty acid and lactic acid, as well as by reducing the consumption of glucose. However, myocardial glucose is significantly used during long-term exercise, which is related to the progression of cardiac physiological hypertrophy (Refs. Reference Xiong44, Reference Zhang45). A previous study has demonstrated that swimming exercise-induced adaptation leads to cardiac physiological hypertrophy and increases glycolysis, glucose oxidation, fatty acid oxidation, and ATP production (Ref. Reference Robbins and Gerszten46). In addition, ET improves the imbalance of mitochondrial dynamics and abnormal changes in mitochondrial structure in pathological states. Treadmill exercise has been identified to attenuate DM-induced cardiac dysfunction by enhancing the cardiac action of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and inducing the AMPK/FOXO3/SIRT3 signalling axis to prevent toxic lipid-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress (Ref. Reference Jin47). A previous study involving ET in a mouse model has reported that ET activates the SIRT1/PGC-1α/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway to attenuate MI-induced mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress (Ref. Reference Jia48). However, the biological mechanism of ET intervention to improve the energy metabolism of CVDs still lacks a theoretical basis and practical measures.

ET improves microcirculation structure and function

Recent invasive investigations have shown that nearly 60% patients of chest pain do not have obstructive CHD (defined as lesions with ≥50% stenosis), which has been realized as a frequent issue encountered in clinical practice (Ref. Reference Schindler and Dilsizian49). This clinical phenomenon is defined as coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), which is mainly due to capillary rarefaction and adverse remodelling of intramural coronary arterioles (Ref. Reference Camici50). It has been shown that ET intervention improves microvascular structure and function (Refs. Reference Tanaka51Reference Koller53). Extensive studies with experimental animals have demonstrated that ET improves coronary capillary angiogenesis and myocardial arteriolarisation, as well as increases coronary capillary exchange capacity and maximal coronary blood flow capacity, thus promoting coronary collateral circulation growth, increasing ischemic threshold and limiting MI size (Refs. Reference Koller53, Reference Merkus54). Additionally, activating NO, PGs and hyperpolarization factors by ET improves hemorheological parameters to reduce prothrombotic risk (Ref. Reference Koller53). However, compared to preserved coronary flow reserve, patients with CMD have a higher prevalence of inducible myocardial ischemia and reduced global perfusion reserve, as well as coronary perfusion efficiency, during ET (Ref. Reference Rahman55). The underlying mechanism merits further investigation. Substantial evidence suggests that ET controls blood pressure throughout the day, including during rest or stressful events. ET enhances endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation through NO release and decreased ROS, and it improves extracellular matrix levels by reducing collagen deposition and matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-2/9 expression. ET also decreases plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and norepinephrine, and it reduces vascular injury via the NF-κB system (Refs. Reference De Ciuceis52, Reference Saco-Ledo56). In a mouse model of MI, Chen et al. (Ref. Reference Chen57) showed that lncRNA Malat1 repairs the cardiac microcirculation by mediating the miR-26b-5p/Mfn1 pathway to block effects on mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis.

In clinical practice, invasive coronary angiography, positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and left ventricular contrast echocardiography are suitable for the noninvasive detection of CMD (Refs. Reference Schindler and Dilsizian49, Reference Ekenbäck58, Reference Schindler59), but these methods still need to be further tested in large-scale randomized clinical trials for intensive and individualized treatment. Therefore, more investigations should be undertaken to reveal different adaptive changes induced by different types, models, and durations of ET in different CVD populations.

ET promotes cardiac repair and regeneration

The end-stage manifestation of many CVDs is HF, of which the pathological driver is death and loss of cardiomyocytes and supporting tissues. Although adult mammalian hearts have limited regenerative capacity, the rate of regeneration is extremely low and declines with age. There are no effective treatment strategies to supplement injured cardiomyocytes and promote cardiac regeneration. Recent advances have verified that regular ET promotes cardiac repair and regeneration by inducing physiological cardiac hypertrophy, inhibiting myocardial apoptosis and necrosis, improving cardiac metabolism, and promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation (Refs. Reference Bo60, Reference Jiang61). Vujic et al. (Ref. Reference Vujic62) found that 8 weeks of voluntary running exercise significantly increased the number of new cardiomyocytes in normal adult and MI mouse hearts. Another study has also demonstrated that running exercise restores cardiomyogenesis in aged mice, which may be associated with circadian rhythm pathways (Ref. Reference Lerchenmüller63). ET, as a physiological stimulus, plays an important cardioprotective role in adult zebrafish by inducing cardiomyocyte proliferation (Ref. Reference Rovira64). Recently, animal studies have revealed that ncRNAs are linked to the control of cardiomyocyte regeneration, renewal, and proliferation. For instance, swimming or wheel exercise upregulates miR-222 expression, which targets the Kip1 (P27), homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1/2 (HIPK1/2), and homeobox-containing 1 (HMBOX1) to induce the proliferation and growth of cardiomyocytes (Ref. Reference Liu65). Other miRNAs, such as miR-342-5p (Ref. Reference Hou66), miR-486 (Ref. Reference Bei67), and miR-133 (Ref. Reference Palabiyik68), also play significant roles in regulating cardiac growth and survival in response to ET. Furthermore, swimming training promotes cardiomyocyte growth and attenuates cardiac remodelling in an MIRI mouse model by upregulating lncRNA CPhar expression, which inhibits the expression of transcription factor 7 (ATF7) by sequestering CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) (Ref. Reference Gao69). Although changes in ncRNA expression in animal studies are at least in part transferable to treatment regimes, more work is still needed to validate their safety and applicability for clinical application.

ET alleviates cardiac fibrosis

Cardiac fibrosis (CF), mainly characterized by the unbalanced production and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, is the main pathological process of CVDs, and it leads to cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmogenesis, and adverse outcomes (Ref. Reference Pesce70). Attenuating CF is a key strategy for maintaining cardiac function and improving the prognosis of patients with CVDs. In addition to traditional drug therapy and new interventions, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy (Refs. Reference Friedman71, Reference Frantz72), increasing evidence from clinical and animal studies suggests that ET-based CR should be taken into consideration to prevent the progression of adverse CF (Refs. Reference Farsangi73Reference Yin76). For example, ET reduces the fibrosis-related protein levels of AT1R, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), lysyl oxidase like-2 (LOX-2), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, p-Smad2/3, TIMP-1/2, MMP-2/9, and collagen I (Refs. Reference Hong77, Reference Yang78). Mechanistically, ET suppresses LOX-2/TGF-β-mediated fibrotic pathways to prevent CF and myocardial abnormalities in early-aged hypertension (Ref. Reference Hong77). In addition, ET increases FGF21 protein expression and regulates the TGF-β1-smad2/3-MMP2/9 axis (Ref. Reference Ma79). ET markedly inhibits lncRNA MIAT expression and upregulates miR-150 to improve cardiac remodeling by inhibiting P2X7 purinergic receptors (P2X7Rs) in diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) (Ref. Reference Wang80). Additionally, ET plays a functional role in HF and DOX-induced cardiotoxicity (Refs. Reference Yang78, Reference Feng81, Reference Hsu82). Although basic and clinical trials associated with antifibrotic drugs have been performed, future studies should focus on exploring the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in the onset and progression of CF to determine integrated and personalized therapeutic strategies. In summary, the early identification, diagnosis, and management of CF are vital in improving the survival and prognosis of CVD patients.

Exercise mediates cardiac protection by ncRNAs

Most recently, an increasing number of studies have indicated that epigenetic modifications are involved in the promotion of cardiac health and the prevention of CVDs. Lifestyle factors, such as exercise and diet, extensively induce epigenetic modifications, including DNA/RNA methylation, histone posttranslational modifications, and ncRNAs (Refs. Reference Wu83, Reference Abraham84). For example, a low-protein diet causes altered sncRNA content in spermatozoa, which is associated with altered levels of lipid metabolites in offspring and decreased expression of specific genes starting in two-cell embryos (Ref. Reference Klastrup85). However, no reported studies have evaluated the link of exercise-induced DNA methylation in cardiac tissue, indicating that the action of different epigenetic mechanisms in EIC needs further study.

Evidence suggests that ncRNAs may be used as novel biomarkers, offering innovative prospects for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of CVDs. In addition to the changes resulting from pathological conditions, ncRNAs and related signalling pathways also undergo changes due to ET (Figure 2). For example, miR-1-3p is an emerging biomarker of high-volume maximal endurance exercise, while in low-volume doses there is an absence of response in low-volume doses (Ref. Reference Fernández-Sanjurjo98). CircRNA MBOAT2 expression is significantly decreased after 24 h of marathon running and can be used as a biomarker for detecting cardiopulmonary adaptation (Ref. Reference Meinecke96). There are many studies of miRNA involvement in exercise adaptations, and far less is currently known about lncRNAs and circRNAs (Table 1). NcRNAs and their signal pathways respond differently to exercise intensity, frequency, and tolerance. Additionally, the correlation between exercise prescription and ncRNAs needs to be further researched in both animal models and clinical cohort studies.

Figure 2. Exercise-induced ncRNAs and their regulated pathways in CVDs. The regulation of ncRNAs contributes to the progression of various CVDs, including hypertension, DCM, ASVDs, MIRI, MI, HF, and DOX-induced cardiomyopathy.

Table 1. Exercise mediates ncRNAs in cardiovascular diseases

Notes: ↑ represents ‘enhanced effect’; ↓ represents ‘reduced effect’; NA represents ‘not available’; *represents ‘cell transfection’; #represents ‘genetic animal model’.

Exercise-induced ncRNAs in MI

MI is a leading cause of cardiovascular death and chronic HF worldwide (Ref. Reference Tsao1). Cardiomyocytes undergo a series of pathological adaptations after MI, including myocardial ischemia, hypoxia, inflammatory response, necrosis, progressive CF, and ventricular enlargement. Persisting structural cardiac abnormalities are associated with arrhythmias, HF, and sudden cardiac death. Although percutaneous coronary intervention and drugs have become the predominant treatment for MI, these strategies cannot reverse or attenuate the biological process, eliminate risk factors, and consistently improve patient outcomes.

It has been demonstrated that regular ET significantly improves cardiac structure and function by rescuing post-MI stunned myocardium (Refs. Reference Pelliccia4, Reference Dibben9). Furthermore, exercise-mediated ncRNAs have great significance in the biological regulation of MI. in vivo studies have shown that 4 weeks of ET increases miR-126 expression and reduces the expression of PIK3R2 and SPRED1. in vitro results have demonstrated that miR-126 promotes angiogenesis by the PI3K/Akt/eNOS and MAPK signalling pathways, subsequently improving of MI cardiac function, including increasing left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) and + dp/dtmax and decreasing left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and collagen volume fraction (Ref. Reference Song87). Compared to the control group, ET reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis and improves CF and systolic function by decreasing lncRNA MIAT expression and increasing the expression of lncRNA H19 and lncRNA GA55 (Ref. Reference Farsangi73). Further exploration has shown that overexpression of lncRNA H19 also dramatically alleviates myocardial infarct size and inflammation by sponging miR-22-3p to target lysine (K)-specific demethylase 3A (KDM3A) (Ref. Reference Zhang99). Likewise, other studies have illustrated that lncRNA H19 plays an essential role in regulating the pathological processes of CVDs by acting as a molecular sponge or interacting with various proteins to target gene expression (Ref. Reference Su100). The above results indicate that lncRNA H19 is a potential marker or a promising target for CVD treatment.

Clinical outcomes and prognosis vary with individual differences in pathophysiological mechanisms. In response to the common cardiac remodelling in the early and late stages of MI, there are currently novel therapeutic strategies, including SGLT2-i, inflammatory modulators, and silencing small RNAs, have been developed (Ref. Reference Frantz72). Furthermore, circulating markers can be combined with novel cardiac imaging techniques, such as CMR and myocardial work index of the left ventricular 17 segment by echocardiography, to help reveal the pathophysiological mechanism of cardiomyopathy and better guide personalized treatment.

Exercise-induced ncRNAs in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

Recovering reperfusion after MI can cause irreversible detrimental effects known as MIRI, including myocardial stunning, reperfusion arrhythmia, no-reflow phenomenon, and lethal reperfusion injury. Pathological changes, such as inflammation, apoptosis, autophagy, and neurohumoral activation, are considered to have the same underlying cause as MIRI (Ref. Reference Marinescu101). Recent findings have revealed that novel ncRNAs are involved in a variety of important biological processes and the development of MIRI (Ref. Reference Li102). Systemic reviews and meta-analyses have also shown that ET increases the left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac output, and coronary blood flow (Ref. Reference Song103). Increased miR-17-3p inhibits TIMP 3 expression to enhance cardiomyocyte proliferation by activating EGFR/JNK/SP-1 signalling (Ref. Reference Shi86). In addition, miR-17-3p indirectly regulates the PTEN/Akt signalling pathway to promote cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vivo and in vitro (Ref. Reference Shi86). Bei et al. reported that downregulation of miR-486 occurs in both MIRI in vivo and OGDR-treated cardiomyocytes in vitro. However, AAV9-mediated miR-486 overexpression in a mouse model of MIRI significantly reduces infarct size, the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and caspase-3 cleavage (Ref. Reference Bei67). Functionally, increasing miR-486 is protective against MIRI and myocardial apoptosis through activating the Akt/mTOR pathway to inhibit PTEN and FoxO1 expression (Ref. Reference Bei67). Concurrently, Hou et al. revealed a novel endogenous cardioprotective mechanism in which long-term exercise-derived circulating exosomal miR-342-5p protects the heart against MIRI. Mechanistically, miR-342-5p targets caspase 9 and JNK 2 to inhibit hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis; it also enhances survival signalling (p-Akt) by targeting phosphatase gene Ppm1f (Ref. Reference Hou66). Other miRNAs, such as miR-125-5p, miR-128-3p, and miR-30d-5p, are also important regulators of EIC against MIRI (Ref. Reference Zhao89). However, there are still few reports about exercise-mediated other ncRNAs (lncRNAs and circRNAs) in MIRI. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms of exercise-mediated ncRNAs in the occurrence and development of MIRI.

Exercise-induced ncRNAs in HF

Exercise-based CR has been recommended as a clinical consultation for HF by international guidelines. Individualized exercise prescription is effective in improving the 6-minute walk distance, cardiopulmonary function, incidence of complications, and quality of life (Refs. Reference McDonagh104, Reference Heidenreich105). Emerging ncRNAs have been found to play roles in EIC and HF (Ref. Reference Ma and Liao106). For instance, Stølen et al. (Ref. Reference Stølen90) found that moderate- and high-intensity ET decrease the expression of miR-31a-5p, miR-214-3p, and miR-495-5P in post-MI HF mice, which reduces arrhythmia susceptibility by slowing Ca2+ transient decay and decreasing collagen content, such as CTGF, collagen 1α1, and TGFβ1 expression. Other ncRNAs, such as miR-1, miR-133, miR-15 family, and circRNA-010567, inhibit myocardial fibrosis by regulating related pathways, including Ang-II, MAPKs, and TGF-β (Refs. Reference Ma and Liao106, Reference Wang107). However, the number of exercise-induced lncRNAs and circRNAs is limited, and their roles in EIC for HF are unclear. As reported by Hu et al. (Ref. Reference Hu92), aerobic exercise improves left ventricular remodelling and cardiac function by inhibiting lncRNA MALAT1 to regulate the miR-150-5p/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway. Overexpression of lncRNA ExACT1 has been shown to aggravate pathological hypertrophy and HF, while inhibition of lncRNA ExACT1 protects against CF and dysfunction by inducing physiological hypertrophy and cardiomyogenesis (Ref. Reference Li93). The potential regulatory mechanism is that the function of lncRNA ExACT1 is regulated by miR-222, calcineurin signalling, and Hippo/Yap1 signalling through dachsous cadherin-related 2 (DCHS2) (Ref. Reference Li93), which provides a potentially tractable therapeutic target for EIC in HF.

Exercise-induced ncRNAs in cardiac hypertrophy

Cardiac hypertrophy is characterized by a marked increase in myocardial mass index, and it can be categorized as physiological or pathological hypertrophy. Physiological myocardial hypertrophy (PMH) is an adaptive and reversible cardiac growth under chronic exercise stimulation and exerts cardioprotective effects. Conversely, pathological hypertrophy develops in response to chronic pressure or volume overload in disease settings, such as transverse aortic constriction (TAC) and aortic stenosis, resulting in adverse cardiac remodelling and dysfunction. Evidence suggests that ncRNAs are directly involved in and regulate different pathological stresses of cardiac hypertrophy. For instance, knocking down or overexpression of miR-30d and certain lncRNAs (Chast, Chaer, NRON, Mhrt, and H19) plays important regulatory roles in a mouse model of TAC-induced cardiac hypertrophy (Refs. Reference Lerchenmüller108, Reference Makarewich and Thum109).

The roles of ncRNAs in exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy are supported by findings in different animal models and training programs. The expression of miR-21, miR-27a, and miR-143 is different after aerobic swimming training in mice presenting physiological left ventricular hypertrophy compared with sedentary controls (Ref. Reference de Gonzalo-Calvo97). Moreover, silencing lncRNA Mhrt779 attenuates the antihypertrophic effect of exercise hypertrophic preconditioning (EHP) in TAC mice and in cultured cardiomyocytes treated with Ang-II, while overexpression of lncRNA Mhrt779 enhances the antihypertrophic effect. Mechanistically, ET increases resistance to pathological pressure overload by an antihypertrophic effect mediated by the lncRNA Mhrt779/Brg1/Hdac2/p-Akt/p-GSK3β signalling pathway (Ref. Reference Lin94). Similarly, lncRNA CPhar and lncRNA ExACT1 have emerged as important mediators underpinning the process of exercise-induced PMH (Refs. Reference Gao69, Reference Li93). Although some circRNAs, such as circRNA sh3rfe (Ref. Reference Ma110), circRNA Cacna1c (Ref. Reference Lu111), circRNA 0001052 (Ref. Reference Yang112), and circRNA Ddx60 (Ref. Reference Zhu95), have been found to be closely related to cardiac hypertrophy, only circRNA Ddx60 has been identified to be needed for exercise-induced PMH in mice on the basis of a forced swim training model. CircRNA Ddx60 contributes to the antihypertrophic effect of EHP by binding and activating eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) (Ref. Reference Zhu95).

Notably, multiple factors, such as genetic background, species, and gender differences, may influence the adaptations and outcomes of exercise. Konhilas et al. (Ref. Reference Konhilas113) found that female mice have a greater increase in PMH after treadmill or voluntary wheel running. It has been revealed that common genetic variants are important pathogenic factors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, suggesting the existence of non-Mendelian inheritance patterns with ethnic differences (Ref. Reference Wu114). Current knowledge on the different expression, regulation, and pathology-related functions of ncRNAs in terms of both sex and age is limited (Refs. Reference Jusic115, Reference Rounge116). Additionally, whether genetic or sex differences influence the expression of ET-induced ncRNAs and their signalling pathway responses remain to be clarified.

Exercise-induced ncRNAs in other CVDs

T2DM is a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia, hyperinsulinemia and high insulin resistance, which causes macrovascular and microvascular complications, such as atherosclerosis, CHD, and diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). Increasing ncRNAs have been recommended as exercise indicators for cardiovascular prescriptions and as preventive or therapeutic targets for cardiovascular complications in T2DM. MiR-126 induced by ET has been found to decrease vascular inflammation and apoptosis via the PI3K/Akt pathway, promote angiogenesis via the VEGF pathway, and increase cardiac autophagy via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway (Refs. Reference Lew88, Reference Ma117). Long-term ET protects against vascular endothelial injury of insulin resistance by downregulating the expression of several lncRNAs, including FR030200 and FR402720 (Ref. Reference Liu118) and then attenuating the progression of atherosclerotic CVD. Similarly, lncRNA NEAT1 induces endothelial pyroptosis by binding Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) to promote the transcriptional activation of the key pyroptotic protein, NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain-associated protein 3 (NLRP3), whereas exercise reverses these effects (Ref. Reference Yang91).

In addition, ncRNAs play significant roles in other CVDs, such as valvular heart diseases (Ref. Reference Chen119), cardiomyopathy (Ref. Reference Liu and Chong120), myocarditis (Ref. Reference Zhang121), and pulmonary hypertension (Ref. Reference Ali122). The main pathophysiological processes also include inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, extracellular matrix reorganization, and fibrosis, but they are still not sufficiently understood in terms of biological mechanisms. Although an increasing number of studies and guidelines have demonstrated that exercise-based CR has beneficial effects on these CVDs (Refs. Reference Hu10, Reference Humbert123, Reference Koh124), the specific molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways of exercise-induced ncRNAs await further investigation. Consequently, this limits improvements in novel therapeutic strategies and biomarkers of risk assessment, as well as prevention and diagnosis of CVDs. In addition, due to significant differences in cardiopulmonary function and different recovery processes after CVD events, it is necessary to develop an optimal individualized exercise-based CR program oriented to clinical problems according to the condition of patients.

Conclusions and perspectives

Despite the benefits of exercise and ncRNAs in CVDs, there is a limited understanding of the molecular regulatory mechanisms of exercise-induced ncRNAs. Additionally, performing exercise-based CR and detecting cardiac biomarkers in clinical practice have been challenging. Exploring the pathophysiological roles and molecular mechanisms induced by physical exercise can facilitate potential alternative strategies for CVD prevention and treatment, as well as facilitate the development of personalized exercise prescriptions. However, several fundamental problems hinder the clinical application of ncRNAs as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

It is challenging to compare ncRNAs and exercise in published studies. First, disputes exist as to whether different exercise prescriptions (including type, intensity, frequency, duration, volume, and progression) benefit CVDs. For instance, recent studies have shown that moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) has a positive effect on the cardiopulmonary function and physical performance of patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (Refs. Reference Hu10, Reference Tamulevičiūtė-Prascienė125), whereas few studies have developed the application of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in patients after TAVR. Thus, the HIIT-induced mechanism remains unclear.

NcRNAs show significant differences in expression during early, middle, and long-term ET, as well as between chronic and acute endurance ET. Studies have revealed that miR-1 and miR-133a expression is elevated following one-time resistance exercise but downregulated following long-term endurance ET. Furthermore, the expression level of ncRNAs may change dramatically during pathological processes of CVDs. For instance, lncRNA H19 expression is markedly upregulated post-MI at the infarct border zone with a peak during four to seven days and subsequently decreases within the following three weeks (Refs. Reference Farsangi73, Reference Choong126). Therefore, the time course of exercise-induced ncRNAs in circulation needs to be considered and clinical indicators, such as cardiac troponin, electrocardiogram, and CMR, need to be combined to explore their predictive value in different stages of CVD development.

Human studies investigating ncRNAs are far from perfect. There are significant differences in ncRNA expression in serum and plasma, which requires more precise approaches to detect ncRNAs and to combine more omics, such as metabolomics, to analyse the molecular mechanism of CVDs. Thottakara et al. (Ref. Reference Thottakara127) reported the first evidence that miR-4454 expression is markedly increased in the plasma of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients compared to healthy individuals and that elevated miR-4454 levels are associated with the severity of CF, which is detected by CMR, suggesting that miR-4454 may be a potential biomarker of fibrosis. Compared to basic experiments, there are more confounding factors in clinical work, including study design, gender, age, lifestyle, chronic diseases, individual differences, and medical intervention. It is difficult to determine whether these confounding factors have uncertain effects on ncRNA expression in the heart.

Above all, exercise-induced ncRNAs in these preliminary studies have provided a positive perspective on the pathophysiological regulation of CVDs. However, other ncRNA families, particularly circRNAs, remain to be further explored in both exercise-based CR and pathological models. Consequently, elucidating the molecular mechanisms involved in exercise-mediated ncRNAs, diseases, and health will help to discover novel biomarkers, as well as therapeutic strategies and improve quality of life.

Abbreviations

ASVD, atherosclerosis vascular disease; ATF7, activating transcription factor 7; BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; C/EBPβ, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β; CF, cardiac fibrosis; CHD, coronary heart disease; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; CR, cardiac rehabilitation; CRP, C-reactive protein; CT, computed tomography; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DCM, diabetic cardiomyopathy; DCHS2, dachsous cadherin-related 2; ECM, extracellular matrix; eEF2, eukaryotic elongation factor 2; EHP, exercise hypertrophic preconditioning; EIC, exercise-induced cardioprotection; ET, exercise training; FGF21, fibroblast growth factor 21; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; HF, heart failure; HMBOX1, homeobox-containing 1; HO-1, heme oxygenase 1; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; HIPK1/2, homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 1/2; IL-1, interleukin-1; KDM3A, lysine (K)-specific demethylase 3A; KLF4, Kruppel-like factor 4; LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LOX-2, lysy1 oxidase like-2; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; MIRI, myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury; MMP, matrix metallopeptidase; MI, myocardial infarction; MKL1, megakaryocytic leukaemia 1; ncRNA, noncoding RNA; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; NO, nitric oxide; NRF2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain-associated protein 3; P2X7R, P2X7 purinergic receptors; PET, positron emission tomography; PMH, physiological myocardial hypertrophy; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SIRT1, sirtuin 1; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TAC, transverse aortic constriction; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VCAM1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; vWF, von Willebrand factor.

Acknowledgements

Figures 1 and 2 were created with BioRender.com.

Author contribution

CYW, XCC, and LY carried out the design and final writing and produced the figures; SLB, HJL, LHZ, and HLZ performed data collection and generated the table; CYW, XCC, LY and YZP reviewed and edited the manuscript; YZP, RJL and HS analysed, supervised and reviewed the project development. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This article was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant 82160439); Basic Research Plan Project of Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (Grants 202001AY070001–028, H-2019053); Yunnan Provincial Training Project of High-level Talents (Grant RLMY-20200001); Medical leading Talents Training Program of Yunnan Provincial Health Commission (Grant L-2019026); Clinical Medical Center for Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease of Yunnan Province (Grant ZX2019-03-01).

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Changyong Wu, Xiaocui Chen and Lu Yang have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

References

Tsao, CW, et al. (2023) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 147, e93e621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnett, DK, et al. (2019) ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 74, 13761414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchis-Gomar, F, et al. (2022) Exercise effects on cardiovascular disease: From basic aspects to clinical evidence. Cardiovascular Research 118, 22532266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelliccia, A, et al. (2021) ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. European Heart Journal 42, 1796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamatakis, E, et al. (2022) Association of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortality. Nature Medicine 28, 25212529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Y, et al. (2021) Mortality in relation to changes in physical activity in middle-aged to older Chinese: An 8-year follow-up of the guangzhou biobank cohort study. Journal of Sport and Health Science 10, 430438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunstan, DW, et al. (2021) Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: Emerging insights and opportunities. Nature Reviews. Cardiology 18, 637648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, RJ, et al. (2019) Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: A scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 140, e69e89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibben, GO, et al. (2023) Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis. European Heart Journal 44, 452469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Q, et al. (2023) Efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity continuous training on the improvement of cardiopulmonary function in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ENERGY): A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 24, 17831790.e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H, et al. (2022) Exercise training maintains cardiovascular health: Signaling pathways involved and potential therapeutics. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7, 306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, CPC, et al. (2018) Non-coding RNAs and exercise: Pathophysiological role and clinical application in the cardiovascular system. Clinical Science 132, 925942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correia, CCM, et al. (2021) Long non-coding RNAs in Cardiovascular Diseases: Potential function as biomarkers and therapeutic targets of exercise training. Non-Coding RNA 7, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaput, JP, et al. (2020) WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: Summary of the evidence. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 17, 141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patnode, CD, et al. (2022) Behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 328, 375388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, CP, et al. (2011) Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: A prospective cohort study. Lancet (London England) 378, 12441253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahid, A, et al. (2016) Quantifying the association between physical activity and cardiovascular disease and diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association 5, e002495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazemi, A, et al. (2022) Comparing the risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality in four lifestyles with a combination of high/low physical activity and healthy/unhealthy diet: A prospective cohort study. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 19, 138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kivimäki, M, et al. (2019) Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: An individual-participant meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 365, l1495.Google ScholarPubMed
Nystoriak, MA and Bhatnagar, A (2018) Cardiovascular effects and benefits of exercise. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 5, 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burtscher, J, et al. (2022) Could repeated cardio-renal injury trigger late cardiovascular sequelae in extreme endurance athletes? Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 52, 28212836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois-Deruy, E, et al. (2020) Oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 9, 864.Google ScholarPubMed
Zalba, G and Moreno, MU (2022) Oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease and comorbidities. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 11, 1519.Google ScholarPubMed
Bull, FC, et al. (2020) World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine 54, 14511462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pei, Z, et al. (2023) Exercise reduces hyperlipidemia-induced cardiac damage in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice via its effects against inflammation and oxidative stress. Scientific Reports 13, 9134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taty Zau, JF, et al. (2018) Exercise through a cardiac rehabilitation program attenuates oxidative stress in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting. Redox Report: Communications in Free Radical Research 23, 9499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tofas, T, et al. (2021) Effects of cardiovascular, resistance and combined exercise training on cardiovascular, performance and blood redox parameters in coronary artery disease patients: An 8-month training-detraining randomized intervention. Antioxidants(Basel, Switzerland) 10, 409.Google ScholarPubMed
Minjares, M, et al. (2023) Oxidative stress and microRNAs in endothelial cells under metabolic disorders. Cells 12, 1341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iantomasi, T, et al. (2023) Oxidative stress and inflammation in osteoporosis: Molecular mechanisms involved and the relationship with microRNAs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, 3772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masoumi-Ardakani, Y, et al. (2022) Moderate endurance training and mitoQ improve cardiovascular function, oxidative stress, and inflammation in hypertensive individuals: The role of miR-21 and miR-222: A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Cell Journal 24, 577585.Google ScholarPubMed
Tang, J, et al. (2023) METTL3-modified lncRNA-SNHG8 binds to PTBP1 to regulate ALAS2 expression to increase oxidative stress and promote myocardial infarction. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 478, 12171229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guan, X, et al. (2023) The effects and mechanism of lncRNA NORAD on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Toxicology 494, 153587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metsios, GS, et al. (2020) Exercise and inflammation. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology 34, 101504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallikadavath, S, et al. (2022) Exercise, inflammation and acute cardiovascular events. Exercise Immunology Review 28, 93103.Google ScholarPubMed
Crea, F, (2022) Physical exercise, inflammation, and hypertension: How to improve cardiovascular prevention. European Heart Journal 43, 47634766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeno, FP, et al. (2020) Effect of aerobic and resistance exercise training on inflammation, endothelial function and ambulatory blood pressure in middle-aged hypertensive patients. Journal of Hypertension 38, 25012509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, G, et al. (2020) Exercise and inflammation in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Journal of sports sciences 38, 814826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, et al. (2023) INKILN is a novel long noncoding RNA promoting vascular smooth muscle inflammation via scaffolding MKL1 and USP10. Circulation 148, 4767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-López, P, et al. (2023) Role of miR-15a-5p and miR-199a-3p in the inflammatory pathway regulated by NF-κB in experimental and human atherosclerosis. Clinical and Translational Medicine 13, e1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, T, et al. (2023) Berberine up-regulates miR-340-5p to protect myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion from HMGB1-mediated inflammatory injury. ESC Heart Failure 10, 931942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fajardo, G, et al. (2022) Mitochondrial Quality Control in the Heart: The balance between physiological and pathological stress. Biomedicines 10, 1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, K, et al. (2023) Mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease: Towards exercise regulation of mitochondrial function. Frontiers in Physiology 14, 1063556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritterhoff, J and Tian, R (2023) Metabolic mechanisms in physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy: New paradigms and challenges. Nature Reviews. Cardiology 20, 812829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiong, Y, et al. (2023) Investigating the effect of exercise on the expression of genes related to cardiac physiological hypertrophy. Cellular and Molecular Biology (Noisy-le-Grand France) 69, 6369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, et al. (2023) Notch1 is involved in physiologic cardiac hypertrophy of mice via the p38 signaling pathway after voluntary running. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, 3212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, JM and Gerszten, RE (2023) Exercise, exerkines, and cardiometabolic health: From individual players to a team sport. The Journal of clinical Investigation 133, e168121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, L et al. (2022) FGF21-sirtuin 3 axis confers the protective effects of exercise against diabetic cardiomyopathy by governing mitochondrial integrity. Circulation 146, 15371557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, D et al. (2019) Postinfarction exercise training alleviates cardiac dysfunction and adverse remodeling via mitochondrial biogenesis and SIRT1/PGC-1α/PI3K/Akt signaling. Journal of Cellular Physiology 234, 2370523718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindler, TH and Dilsizian, V (2020) Coronary microvascular dysfunction: Clinical considerations and noninvasive diagnosis. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging 13, 140155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camici, PG, et al. (2020) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophy and heart failure. Cardiovascular Research 116, 806816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, H ( 2019 ) Antiaging effects of aerobic exercise on systemic arteries. Hypertension 74, 237243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Ciuceis, C, et al. (2023) Microcirculation and physical exercise in hypertension. Hypertension 80, 730739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koller, A, et al. (2022) Functional and structural adaptations of the coronary macro- and microvasculature to regular aerobic exercise by activation of physiological, cellular, and molecular mechanisms: ESC working group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation position paper. Cardiovascular Research 118, 357371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkus, D, et al. (2021) Coronary microvascular adaptations distal to epicardial artery stenosis. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 320, H2351h2370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, H, et al. (2019) Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with myocardial ischemia and abnormal coronary perfusion during exercise. Circulation 140, 18051816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saco-Ledo, G, et al. (2020) Exercise reduces ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Heart Association 9, e018487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y, et al. (2021) The lncRNA Malat1 regulates microvascular function after myocardial infarction in mice via miR-26b-5p/Mfn1 axis-mediated mitochondrial dynamics. Redox Biology 41, 101910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekenbäck, C, et al. (2023) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in takotsubo syndrome and associations with left ventricular function. ESC Heart Failure 10, 23952405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindler, TH, et al. (2023) Myocardial perfusion PET for the detection and reporting of coronary microvascular dysfunction: A JACC: Cardiovascular imaging expert panel statement. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging 16, 536548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bo, B, et al. (2020) The molecular mechanisms associated with aerobic exercise-induced cardiac regeneration. Biomolecules 11, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, J, et al. (2023) Keeping the heart healthy: The role of exercise in cardiac repair and regeneration. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 39, 10881107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vujic, A, et al. (2018) Exercise induces new cardiomyocyte generation in the adult mammalian heart. Nature Communications 9, 1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerchenmüller, C, et al. (2022) Restoration of cardiomyogenesis in aged mouse hearts by voluntary exercise. Circulation 146, 412426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovira, M, et al. (2018) Physiological responses to swimming-induced exercise in the adult zebrafish regenerating heart. Frontiers in Physiology 9, 1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X, et al. (2015) miR-222 is necessary for exercise-induced cardiac growth and protects against pathological cardiac remodeling. Cell Metabolism 21, 584595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hou, Z, et al. (2019) Longterm exercise-derived exosomal miR-342-5p: A novel exerkine for cardioprotection. Circulation Research 124, 13861400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bei, Y, et al. (2022) miR-486 attenuates cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and mediates the beneficial effect of exercise for myocardial protection. Molecular Therapy: The Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 30, 16751691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palabiyik, O, et al. (2019) Alteration in cardiac PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK signaling pathways with the use of growth hormone and swimming, and the roles of miR21 and miR133. Biomed Rep. 0(0), 110 doi: 10.3892/br.2018.1179. PMID: 30842884 PMCID: PMC6391709.Google ScholarPubMed
Gao, R, et al. (2021) Long noncoding RNA cardiac physiological hypertrophy-associated regulator induces cardiac physiological hypertrophy and promotes functional recovery after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation 144, 303317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pesce, M, et al. (2023) Cardiac fibroblasts and mechanosensation in heart development, health and disease. Nature Reviews. Cardiology 20, 309324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, SL (2022) Fighting cardiac fibrosis with CAR T cells. The New England Journal of Medicine 386, 15761578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frantz, S, et al. (2022) Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: Pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies. European Heart Journal 43, 25492561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farsangi, SJ, et al. (2021) Modulation of the expression of long non-coding RNAs H19, GAS5, and MIAT by endurance exercise in the hearts of rats with myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular Toxicology 21, 162168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchis-Gomar, F, et al. (2021) Exercise effects on cardiovascular disease: From basic aspects to clinical evidence. Cardiovascular Research 118, 22532266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassina, D, et al. (2022) Modelling the interaction between stem cells derived cardiomyocytes patches and host myocardium to aid non-arrhythmic engineered heart tissue design. PLoS Computational Biology 18, e1010030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, X, et al. (2023) Post-myocardial infarction fibrosis: Pathophysiology, examination, and intervention. Frontiers in Pharmacology 14, 1070973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, Y, et al. (2022) Exercise intervention prevents early aged hypertension-caused cardiac dysfunction through inhibition of cardiac fibrosis. Aging 14, 43904401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, HL, et al. (2020) Early moderate intensity aerobic exercise intervention prevents doxorubicin-caused cardiac dysfunction through inhibition of cardiac fibrosis and inflammation. Cancers 12, 1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Y, et al. (2021) Exercise training alleviates cardiac fibrosis through increasing fibroblast growth factor 21 and regulating TGF-β1-smad2/3-MMP2/9 signaling in mice with myocardial infarction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 12341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, T, et al. (2022) Aerobic exercise inhibited P2X7 purinergic receptors to improve cardiac remodeling in mice with type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Physiology 13, 828020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, N, et al. (2023) Exercise training attenuates angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis by reducing POU2F1 expression. Journal of Sport and Health Science 12, 464476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, CC, et al. (2023) Hypermethylation of ACADVL is involved in the high-intensity interval training-associated reduction of cardiac fibrosis in heart failure patients. Journal of Translational Medicine 21, 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, et al. (2021) The epigenetic landscape of exercise in cardiac health and disease. Journal of Sport and Health Science 10, 648659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abraham, MJ, et al. (2023) Restoring epigenetic reprogramming with diet and exercise to improve health-related metabolic diseases. Biomolecules 13, 318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klastrup, LK, et al. (2019) The influence of paternal diet on sncRNA-mediated epigenetic inheritance. Molecular Genetics and Genomics : MGG 294, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, J, et al. (2017) miR-17-3p contributes to exercise-induced cardiac growth and protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Theranostics 7, 664676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, W, et al. (2020) HIF-1α-induced up-regulation of microRNA-126 contributes to the effectiveness of exercise training on myocardial angiogenesis in myocardial infarction rats. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24, 1297012979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lew, JK, et al. (2020) Exercise regulates microRNAs to preserve coronary and cardiac function in the diabetic heart. Circulation Research 127, 13841400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, H, et al. (2022) Small extracellular vesicles from brown adipose tissue mediate exercise cardioprotection. Circulation Research 130, 14901506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stølen, TO, et al. (2020) Exercise training reveals micro-RNAs associated with improved cardiac function and electrophysiology in rats with heart failure after myocardial infarction. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 148, 106119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Q, et al. (2023) Exercise mitigates endothelial pyroptosis and atherosclerosis by downregulating NEAT1 through N6-methyladenosine modifications. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 43, 910926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L, et al. (2021) Aerobic exercise improves cardiac function in rats with chronic heart failure through inhibition of the long non-coding RNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1). Annals of Translational Medicine 9, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H, et al. (2022) lncExACT1 and DCHS2 regulate physiological and pathological cardiac growth. Circulation 145, 12181233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, H, et al. (2021) Antihypertrophic memory after regression of exercise-induced physiological myocardial hypertrophy is mediated by the long noncoding RNA Mhrt779. Circulation 143, 22772292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y, et al. (2023) Circ-Ddx60 contributes to the antihypertrophic memory of exercise hypertrophic preconditioning. Journal of Advanced Research 46, 113121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinecke, A, et al. (2020) Cardiac endurance training alters plasma profiles of circular RNA MBOAT2. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 319, H13H21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Gonzalo-Calvo, D, et al. (2018) Circulating microRNAs as emerging cardiac biomarkers responsive to acute exercise. International Journal of Cardiology 264, 130136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Sanjurjo, M, et al. (2020) Exercise dose affects the circulating microRNA profile in response to acute endurance exercise in male amateur runners. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 30, 18961907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, BF, et al. (2020) LncRNA H19 ameliorates myocardial infarction-induced myocardial injury and maladaptive cardiac remodelling by regulating KDM3A. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24, 10991115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, W, et al. (2021) The function of LncRNA-H19 in cardiac hypertrophy. Cell & Bioscience 11, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinescu, MC, et al. (2022) Non-coding RNAs: Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, 2728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Q, et al. (2021) Involvement of non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine 47, 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, W, et al. (2023) Exercise for myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical studies. Microvascular Research 147, 104502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonagh, TA, et al. (2023) Focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal 44, 36273693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heidenreich, PA, et al. (2022) AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 145, e895–e1032.Google Scholar
Ma, S and Liao, Y (2019) Noncoding RNAs in exercise-induced cardio-protection for chronic heart failure. EBioMedicine 46, 532540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L, et al. (2023) Circular RNAs in cardiovascular diseases: Regulation and therapeutic applications. Research (Washington D.C.) 6, 0038.Google ScholarPubMed
Lerchenmüller, C, et al. (2020) CITED4 protects against adverse remodeling in response to physiological and pathological stress. Circulation Research 127, 631646.Google ScholarPubMed
Makarewich, CA and Thum, T (2022) Exercise-induced long noncoding RNAs as new players in cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation 145, 12341237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, CX, et al. (2023) Circ-sh3rf3/GATA-4/miR-29a regulatory axis in fibroblast-myofibroblast differentiation and myocardial fibrosis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences : CMLS 80, 50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, P, et al. (2023) Silencing of circCacna1c inhibits ISO-induced cardiac hypertrophy through miR-29b-2-5p/NFATc1 axis. Cells 12, 1667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M, et al. (2023) Circ_0001052 promotes cardiac hypertrophy via elevating Hipk3. Aging 15, 10251038.Google Scholar
Konhilas, JP, et al. (2004) Sex modifies exercise and cardiac adaptation in mice. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 287, H27682776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, et al. (2020) East asian-specific common variant in TNNI3 predisposes to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 142, 20862089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusic, A, et al. (2020) Approaching sex differences in cardiovascular non-coding RNA research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, 4890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rounge, TB, et al. (2018) Circulating small non-coding RNAs associated with age, sex, smoking, body mass and physical activity. Scientific Reports 8, 17650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Y, et al. (2022) Roles of physical exercise-induced MiR-126 in cardiovascular health of type 2 diabetes. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 14, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S, et al. (2018) Effect of long-term exercise training on lncRNAs expression in the vascular injury of insulin resistance. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 11, 459469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, L, et al. (2022) Integrated analysis of lncRNA-mediated ceRNA network in calcific aortic valve disease. Cells 11, 2204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S and Chong, W (2021) Roles of lncrnas in regulating mitochondrial dysfunction in septic cardiomyopathy. Frontiers in Immunology 12, 802085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C, et al. (2020) The role of non-coding RNAs in viral myocarditis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 10, 312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, MK, et al. (2022) The role of circular RNAs in pulmonary hypertension. The European Respiratory Journal 60, 2200012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humbert, M, et al. (2023) ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. The European Respiratory Journal 61, 2200879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, CH (2023) Utility of cardiopulmonary exercise test in mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Current Problems in Cardiology 48, 101196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamulevičiūtė-Prascienė, E, et al. (2021) The impact of additional resistance and balance training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in older patients after valve surgery or intervention: Randomized control trial. BMC Geriatrics 21, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choong, OK, et al. (2019) Hypoxia-induced H19/YB-1 cascade modulates cardiac remodeling after infarction. Theranostics 9, 65506567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thottakara, T, et al. (2021) A novel miRNA screen identifies miRNA-4454 as a candidate biomarker for ventricular fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Biomolecules 11, 1718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Protective effects of exercise rehabilitation in CVDs. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation plays a significant role in the pathophysiological evolution of cardiovascular health, including reducing myocardial oxidative stress and the inflammatory response, improving microvascular dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis, and promoting cardiac metabolism, physiological hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte proliferation. These benefits may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular complications, the rehospitalization rate, and mortality. VCAM1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; LOX-1, lectin-like oxidized LDL-receptor-1.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Exercise-induced ncRNAs and their regulated pathways in CVDs. The regulation of ncRNAs contributes to the progression of various CVDs, including hypertension, DCM, ASVDs, MIRI, MI, HF, and DOX-induced cardiomyopathy.

Figure 2

Table 1. Exercise mediates ncRNAs in cardiovascular diseases