Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:25:36.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of modelling techniques used to characterise oxygen uptake kinetics during the on-transient of exercise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2001

Christopher Bell
Affiliation:
The Centre for Activity and Ageing, School of Kinesiology and Department of Physiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7
Donald H. Paterson
Affiliation:
The Centre for Activity and Ageing, School of Kinesiology and Department of Physiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7
John M. Kowalchuk
Affiliation:
The Centre for Activity and Ageing, School of Kinesiology and Department of Physiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7
Javier Padilla
Affiliation:
The Centre for Activity and Ageing, School of Kinesiology and Department of Physiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7
David A. Cunningham
Affiliation:
The Centre for Activity and Ageing, School of Kinesiology and Department of Physiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7
Get access

Abstract

We compared estimates for the phase 2 time constant (τ) of oxygen uptake (V˙O2) during moderate- and heavy-intensity exercise, and the slow component of V˙O2 during heavy-intensity exercise using previously published exponential models. Estimates for τ and the slow component were different (P < 0.05) among models. For moderate-intensity exercise, a two-component exponential model, or a mono-exponential model fitted from 20 s to 3 min were best. For heavy-intensity exercise, a three-component model fitted throughout the entire 6 min bout of exercise, or a two-component model fitted from 20 s were best. When the time delays for the two- and three-component models were equal the best statistical fit was obtained; however, this model produced an inappropriately low ΔV˙O2/ΔWR (WR, work rate) for the projected phase 2 steady state, and the estimate of phase 2 τ was shortened compared with other models. The slow component was quantified as the difference between V˙O2 at end-exercise (6 min) and at 3 min (ΔV˙O2 (6-3 min); 259 ml min-1), and also using the phase 3 amplitude terms (truncated to end-exercise) from exponential fits (409-833 ml min-1). Onset of the slow component was identified by the phase 3 time delay parameter as being of delayed onset ~2 min (vs. arbitrary 3 min). Using this delay ΔV˙O2 (6-2 min) was ~400 ml min-1. Use of valid consistent methods to estimate τ and the slow component in exercise are needed to advance physiological understanding. Experimental Physiology (2001) 86.5, 667-676.

Type
Full Length Papers
Copyright
© The Physiological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)