Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hpxsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-24T02:51:34.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk breeds risk aversion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Tai-Sen He  and
Fuhai Hong
Tai-Sen He*
Affiliation:
Division of Economics, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Fuhai Hong*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China Division of Economics, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine whether exposure to a more or less risky environment affects people’s subsequent risk-taking behavior. In a laboratory setting, all subjects went through twelve rounds of multiple-price-list decisions between a risky alternative and a safe alternative. In the first six rounds, subjects were randomly assigned to a high-, moderate-, or low-risk environment, which differed in the variances of the lotteries they were exposed to. In the last six rounds, subjects in all treatments made decisions on an identical set of lotteries. We found that subjects who had experienced a riskier environment exhibited a higher degree of risk aversion. Our experimental design allows us to conclude that this effect is driven by the risk environment per se, rather than the realized outcomes of the risk. This finding has important theoretical and policy implications.

Keywords

RiskRisk aversionLaboratory experiment

JEL classification

C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior D81: Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 815 - 835
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9553-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Earlier versions of this paper were circulated under the titles of “Exposure to Risk and Risk Aversion: A Laboratory Experiment” and “Bigger Risk, More Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence”.

References

Andersen, S, Harrison, GW, Lau, MI, & Rutstrom, EE (2006). Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics, 9(4), 383–405. 10.1007/s10683-006-7055-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S, Harrison, GW, Lau, MI, & Rutström, E (2008). Lost in state space: Are preferences stable?. International Economic Review, 49, 1091–1112. 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00507.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barseghyan, L, Prince, J, & Teitelbaum, JC (2011). Are risk preferences stable across contexts? Evidence from insurance data. American Economic Review, 101, 591–631. 10.1257/aer.101.2.591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogan, V, Just, D, & Wansink, B (2013). Do psychological shocks affect financial risk taking behavior? A study of U.S. veterans. Contemporary Economic Policy, 31(3), 457–467. 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2012.00319.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckert, M, Schwieren, C, Kudielka, B, & Fiebach, C (2014). Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 82 10.3389/fnins.2014.00082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, M, Isaqzadeh, M, Long, J, & Sprenger, C (2014). Violence and risk preference: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 104(1), 123–148. 10.1257/aer.104.1.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L, & Shah, M (2015). Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. Journal of Human Resources, 50, 484–515. 10.3368/jhr.50.2.484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, Y, & Schechter, L (2015). Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time and social preferences: A review and some new results. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 151–170. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckel, CC, El-Gamal, MA, & Wilson, RK (2009). Risk loving after the storm: A Bayesian-network study of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69, 110–124. 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U (2007). Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeree, J, Holt, C, & Palfrey, T (2002). Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 104, 247–272. 10.1006/jeth.2001.2914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeree, J, Holt, C, & Palfrey, T (2003). Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games and Economic Behavior, 45(1), 97–113. 10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00052-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2013). Time varying risk aversion. NBER working paper No. 19284. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C, & Laury, S (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. 10.1257/000282802762024700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandasamy, N et al., (2014). Cortisol shifts financial risk preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9), 3608–3613. 10.1073/pnas.1317908111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusk, JL, Coble, KH Cox, JC, & Harrison, GW (2008). Risk aversion in the presence of background risk: Evidence from an economic experiment. Risk aversion in experiments (Research in experimental economics), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 315–340. 10.1016/S0193-2306(08)00006-9Google Scholar
Malmendier, U, & Nagel, S (2011). Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373–416. 10.1093/qje/qjq004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, M, Gorlick, M, & Lighthall, N (2009). To brake or accelerate when the light turns yellow? Stress reduces older adults’ risk taking in a driving game. Psychological Science, 20(2), 174–176. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02275.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mengel, F, Tsakas, E, & Vostroknutov, A (2016). Past experience of uncertainty affects risk aversion. Experimental Economics, 19(1), 151–176. 10.1007/s10683-015-9431-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monat, A, Averill, J, & Lazarus, R (1972). Anticipatory stress and coping reactions under various conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 237–253. 10.1037/h0033297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, Q (2011). Does nurture matter: Theory and experimental investigation on the effect of working environment on risk and time preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43, 245–270. 10.1007/s11166-011-9130-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohman, A (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion, Presidential address presented at the 25th annual meeting of the society for psychophysiological research. Psychophysiology, 23(2), 123–145. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00608.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, L, Savage, DA, & Torgler, B (2014). Variation in risk taking behavior following large losses: A natural experiment. European Economic Review, 71, 121–131. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porcelli, A, & Delgado, M (2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20(3), 278–283. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02288.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, T, Assem, M, Baltussen, G, & Thaler, R (2008). Deal or no deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. American Economic Review, 98(1), 38–71. 10.1257/aer.98.1.38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapienza, P, Zingales, L, & Maestripieri, D (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(36), 15268–15273. 10.1073/pnas.0907352106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straznicka, K. (2012). Temporal stability of risk preference measures. Working paper GATE 2012-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, RH, & Johnson, EJ (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effect of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voors, Maarten J, Nillesen, EEM, Verwimp, P, Bulte, EH, Lensink, R, & Van Soest, DP (2012). Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. American Economic Review, 102(2), 941–964. 10.1257/aer.102.2.941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakowski, S (1995). The effects of stressor predictability of lymphocyte proliferation in humans. Psychology and Health, 10, 409–425. 10.1080/08870449508401960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

He and Hong supplementary material

Online Appendix
Download He and Hong supplementary material(File)
File 888.5 KB