Hostname: page-component-5ffc9858b4-dfg7l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-24T03:08:34.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the cultural basis of gender differences in negotiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Steffen Andersen ,
Seda Ertac ,
Uri Gneezy ,
John A. List  and
Sandra Maximiano
Steffen Andersen*
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, Copenhagen Business School, Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark CPER, Washington, DC, USA
Seda Ertac*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Koc University, 34450 Rumeli Feneri Yolu, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey
Uri Gneezy*
Affiliation:
Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, 92093 La Jolla, CA, USA
John A. List*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th St., 60637 Chicago, IL, USA NBER, Cambridge, MA, USA
Sandra Maximiano*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, Rua Miguel Lupi, 20, 1200-781 Lisboa, Portugal
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study how culture and social structure influence bargaining behavior across gender, by exploring the negotiation culture in matrilineal and patriarchal societies using data from a laboratory experiment and a natural field experiment. One interesting result is that in both the actual marketplace and in the laboratory bargaining game, women in the matrilineal society earn more than men, at odds with years of evidence observed in the western world. We find that this result is critically driven by which side of the market the person is occupying: female (male) sellers in the matrilineal (patriarchal) society extract more of the bargaining surplus than male (female) sellers. In the buyer role, however, we observe no significant differences across societies.

Keywords

GenderBargainingField experimentsCulture

JEL classification

C93: Field Experiments J16: Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
Type
Original Paper
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 757 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9547-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Andersen, S, Bulte, E, Gneezy, U, & List, JA (2008). Do women supply more public goods than men? Preliminary experimental evidence from matrilineal and patriarchal societies. The American Economic Review, 98(2), 376–381. 10.1257/aer.98.2.376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S, Ertac, S, Gneezy, U, List, JA, & Maximiano, S (2013). Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1438–1443. 10.1162/REST_a_00312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L, Gelfand, M, Small, D, Stayn, H Crèmer, DD, Zeelenberg, M, & Murnighan, JK (2006). Gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations. Social psychology and economics, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 239–259.Google Scholar
Babcock, L, & Laschever, S (2003). Women don’t ask, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 10.1515/9781400825691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, D., Ibañez, M., Riener, G., & Wollni, M. (2015). Volunteering to take on power: Experimental evidence from matrilineal and patriarchal societies in India (No. 191). Courant Research Centre PEG.Google Scholar
Bateman, AJ (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368. 10.1038/hdy.1948.21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowles, HR, Babcock, L, & Lai, L (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, HR, Babcock, L, & McGinn, KL (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951–965. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cárdenas, JC, Dreber, A, Von Essen, E, & Ranehill, E (2012). Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: Comparing children in Colombia and Sweden. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 11–23. 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croson, R, & Gneezy, U (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1–27. 10.1257/jel.47.2.448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, London: Murray.Google Scholar
Eagly, AH, & Johnson, BT (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256. 10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A, Makhijani, M, & Klonsky, B (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22. 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2008). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In Plott, C., Smith, V. (Eds.), Handbook of results in experimental economics (vol 1, pp 509–519).Google Scholar
Ertac, S, & Gurdal, MY (2012). Deciding to decide: Gender, leadership and risk-taking in groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 24–30. 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhart, B, & Rynes, S (1991). Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 256–262. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U, Leonard, KL, & List, JA (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77(5), 1637–1664. 10.3982/ECTA6690Google Scholar
Gneezy, U, Niederle, M, & Rustichini, A (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074. 10.1162/00335530360698496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, Uri, & Rustichini, Aldo (2004). Gender and competition at a young age. American Economic Review, 94(2), 377–381. 10.1257/0002828041301821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, B, Yan, H, & Yang, CL (2015). Gender differences in the dictator experiment: Evidence from the Matrilineal Mosuo and the Patriarchal Yi. Experimental Economics, 18, 302–313. 10.1007/s10683-014-9403-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, GW, & List, JA (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. 10.1257/0022051043004577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kray, LJ, Galinsky, AD, & Thompson, L (2002). Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 386–410. 10.1006/obhd.2001.2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kray, LJ, & Thompson, L (2005). Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 103–182. 10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26004-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kray, L, Thompson, L, & Galisnsky, A (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotypes and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942–958. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibbrandt, A, & List, JA (2015). Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Science, 61(9), 2016–2024. 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, JA (2004). The nature and extent of discrimination in the marketplace: Evidence from the field. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 49–89. 10.1162/003355304772839524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederle, M, & Vesterlund, L (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101. 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pondorfer, A, Barsbai, T, & Schmidt, U (2017). Gender differences in stereotypes of risk preferences: Experimental evidence from a matrilineal and a patrilineal society, management science. Management Science, 63(10), 3268–3284. 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuhlmacher, AF, & Citera, M (2005). Hostile behavior and profit in virtual negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 69–93. 10.1007/s10869-005-6984-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuhlmacher, A, & Walters, A (1999). Gender differences in negotiation outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52, 653–677. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00175.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R, & Campbell, B (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971, Chicago: Aldine Press 139–179.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Andersen et al. supplementary material

Appendices A and B
Download Andersen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 49.2 KB