We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Camera, G, & Casari, M (2017). Monitoring institutions in indefinitely repeated games. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cason, TN, Sheremeta, RM, & Zhang, J (2017). Asymmetric and endogenous within-group communication in competitive coordination games. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, DJ, & Van Huyck, J (2017). Coordination and transfer. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devetag, G, & Ortmann, A (2007). When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experimental Economics, 10(3), 331–344. 10.1007/s10683-007-9178-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J, & Fehr, D (2017). Equilibrium selection in similar repeated games: Experimental evidence on the role of precedents. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feliz-Ozbey, E, Ham, JC, Kagel, JH, & Ozbay, EY (2016). The role of cognitive ability and personality traits for men and women in gift exchange outcomes. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D, & Levine, DK (1998). The theory of learning in games, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, JC, & Selten, R (1988). A general theory of equilibrium selection in games, Cambridge: MIT Press Books.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, N, Luchini, S, Shogren, JF, & Zylberstejn, A (2017). Coordination and communication under oath. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, V, Orland, A, & Posadzy, K (2017). Fairness versus efficiency: How procedural fairness concerns affect coordination. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, A, Friesen, L, Kalayci, K, & Man, P (2017). A minimum effort coordination game experiment in continuous time. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, F, Van Huyck, JB, & Battalio, RC (2000). Strategic similarity and emergent conventions: Evidence from similar stag hunt games. Games and Economic Behavior, 32(2), 315–337. 10.1006/game.1999.0711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, Battalio, RC, & Beil, RO (1990). Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. The American Economic Review, 80(1), 234–248.Google Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, Battalio, RC, & Beil, RO (1991). Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 885–910. 10.2307/2937932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, Cook, JP, & Battalio, RC (1994). Selection dynamics, asymptotic stability, and adaptive behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 975–1005. 10.1086/261961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, & Stahl, DO (2017). Conditional behavior and learning in similar stag hunt games. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar