Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:03:46.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yields and Responses to Lime and Potassium Fertilizer in Different Cropping Years in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

H. L. Foster
H. L. Foster
Affiliation:
Kawanda Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Trials on ferrallitic soils in Uganda showed that crops responded to lime after the first year of cropping on soils which had a pH up to 6·0, and to potassium on soils which had an extractable K level up to 18 mg 100 g−1. Soil and leaf analyses indicated that responses to lime on soils of pH above 5·2 were due to an increase in phosphate availability. Low yields at several sites in the first year were apparently due to immobilization of nutrients during rapid mineralization of soil organic matter. In later years soil organic matter did not decline appreciably, and yields dropped only at sites where potassium or minor element deficiencies apparently developed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 193 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

D'Hoore, J. L. (1965). Soils Map of Africa—1:5,000,000 with explanatory monograph. Lagos: Comm. Tech. Cooperation in Africa.Google Scholar
Foster, H. L. (1970). E. Afr. agric. For. J. 36, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, H. L. (1971). E. Afr. agric. For. J. 37, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, H. L. (1972). E. Afr. agric. For. J. 37, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, H. L. (1976). PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Foster, H. L. (1978). Trop. Agric., Trinidad 55, 255.Google Scholar
Foster, H. L. & Chang, K. C. (1977). International Developments in Oil Palm (Eds Earp, D. A. and Newall, W.), 290. Kuala Lumpur: Incorp. Soc. of Planters.Google Scholar
Hingston, F. J., Atkinson, R. J., Posner, A. M. & Quirk, J. P. (1967). Nature 215, 1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. (1972). Expl Agric. 8, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juo, A. S. R. & Uzu, F. O. (1977). Plant and Soil 47, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Mare, P. H. (1960). Trans 7th Int. Congr. Soil Sci.3, 600.Google Scholar
Soltanpour, P. N., Adams, F. & Bennett, A. C. (1974). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar