Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:06:41.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WATERMELON INTERCROPPED WITH CEREALS UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS: AN ON-FARM STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2012

P. MUNISSE ,
B. D. JENSEN ,
O. A. QUILAMBO ,
S. B. ANDERSEN  and
J. L. CHRISTIANSEN
P. MUNISSE
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Institute of Mozambique, Av. FPLM 2698, Maputo, Mozambique
B. D. JENSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
O. A. QUILAMBO
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, POB 257, Maputo, Mozambique
S. B. ANDERSEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
J. L. CHRISTIANSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intercropping is a common practice in Africa, but the advantage compared to sole cropping depends on the crop plants and local agro-ecological conditions. The potential of intercropping maize (Zea mays) or sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) with watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) was tested in two on-farm trials in southern Mozambique under semi-arid conditions in an area with low and unpredictable rainfall. In the first experiment, plant density, yield and monetary value of sole and intercropping plots of maize with watermelon were determined in 17 farmers' fields in an area where all crops developed to maturity and harvest. There was a significant reduction in yield of both maize (28.8%) and watermelon (57.8%) in the intercrop compared with the sole crop yields. However, the mean land equivalent ratio of 1.13 for yield showed that intercropping had advantages as, on average, an area planted with sole crops would require 13% more land than an intercrop production to generate the same outcome. In the second experiment, carried out in another area with 16 farmers' fields, drought was more pronounced and only watermelon developed to maturity. Intercroppings with maize and sorghum resulted in 70% and 69% yield reduction, respectively. In conclusion, watermelon is a good companion crop for intercropping with cereals to mitigate the risk of total crop failure due to drought.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 388 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. and Sinebo, W. (2006). Crop productivity and land-use efficiency of teff/faba bean mixed cropping system in a tropical highland environment. Experimental Agriculture 42:495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilalis, D., Papastylianou, P., Konstantas, A., Patsiali, S., Karkanis, A. and Efthimiadou, A. (2010). Weed-suppressive effects of maize–legume intercropping in organic farming. International Journal of Pest Management 56:173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, R., Famba, S., Munguambe, P., Ibraimo, N. and Julaia, C. (2009). Profile of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique (A contribution to the Challenge Program on Water and Food, CPWF Project 17, ‘The challenge of integrated water resource management for improved rural livelihoods: Managing risks, mitigating drought and improving water productivity in the water scarce Limpopo Basin’, WaterNet Working Paper 11). Harare: WaterNet.Google Scholar
Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Syahsar, B. A. and Ramrodi, M. (2010). The role of intercropping maize (Zea may L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on yield and soil chemical properties. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5:631–636.Google Scholar
Direcção Nacional da Administração Local (2005). Perfil do Distrito de Mabalane, Província de Gaza. Maputo: Ministério da Administração Local.Google Scholar
Ghanbari, A., Dahmardeh, M., Siahsar, B. A. and Ramroudi, M. (2010). Effect of maize (Zea mays L.)–cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in arid environment. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 8:102–108.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P. K., Tripathi, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, K. K. and Manna, M. C. (2009). Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy 31:43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, R. M. (2010). Implications of climate change for agricultural sector performance in Africa: Policy challenges and research agenda. Journal of African Economies 19:77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulugalle, N. R., Ezumah, H. C. and Leyman, T. (1994). Changes in surface soil properties of a no-tilled tropical Alfisol due to intercropping maize, cassava and ‘egusi melo’. Field Crops Research 36:191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeorgu, J. E. G. (1991). Effects of maize and cassava on the performance of intercropped egusi melon (Citrullus lanatus (L) Thunb) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench) in Nigeria. Scientia Horticulturae 48:261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeorgu, J. E. G., Ezumah, H. C. and Wahua, T. A. T. (1989). Productivity of species in cassava/maize/okra/egusi melon complex mixtures in Nigeria. Field Crops Research 21:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. A. and Garrity, D. P. (1993). Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: Water. Field Crops Research 34:303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucheru-Muna, M., Pypers, P., Mugendi, D., Kung'u, J., Mugwe, J., Merckx, R. and Vanlauwe, B. (2010). A staggered maize–legume intercrop arrangement robustly increases crop yields and economic returns in the highlands of Central Kenya. Field Crops Research 115:132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. (1988). The effects on soil temperature and moisture content and crop growth and yield of intercropping maize with melon (Colocynthis vulgaris). Experimental Agriculture 24:67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S. J. (1986). Agroclimate of Mozambique as Relevant to Dry-Land Agriculture. Comunicação no 47, Série Terra e Água. Maputo: Instituto Nacionalde Investigação Agronómica.Google Scholar
Seran, T. H. and Brintha, I. (2010). Review on maize based intercropping. Journal of Agronomy 9:135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, C. M., Ogle, B. and Udén, P. (1996). Water melons (Citrullus vulgaris) as the main source of water for cattle in central Tanzania. Tropical Grasslands 30:308–313.Google Scholar
Silwana, T. T. and Lucas, E. O. (2002). The effect of planting combinations and weeding on the growth and yield of component crops of maize/bean and maize/pumpkin intercrops. Journal of Agricultural Science 138:193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, L. C., Dyer, J. C., Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Twyman, C. and Mkwambisi, D. (2009). Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: Local insights to enhance policy in southern Africa. Environmental Science and Policy 12:748–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1993). Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Research 34:381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesterager, J. M., Nielsen, N. E. and Høgh-Jensen, H. (2008). Effects of cropping history and phosphorus source on yield and nitrogen fixation in sole and intercropped cowpea-maize systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80:61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1990). Resource use intercropping systems. Water Management 17:215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, R. S. and Yadav, O. P. (2001). The performance of cultivars of pearl millet and clusterbean under sole cropping and intercropping systems in arid zone conditions in India. Experimental Agriculture 37:231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokota, A., Kawasaki, S., Iwano, M., Nakamura, C., Miyake, C. and Akashi, K. (2002). Citrulline and DRIP-1 protein (ArgE homologue) in drought tolerance of wild watermelon. Annals of Botany 89:825–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zegada-Lizarazu, W., Niitembu, S. and Iijima, M. (2005). Mixed planting with legumes modified the source and water use of pearl millet. Plant Production Science 8:433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar