Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:07:23.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variable expressivity and heritability of multiflorous spikelets in oat panicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2019

C. M. Zimmer Open the ORCID record for C. M. Zimmer [Opens in a new window] ,
I. P. Ubert ,
M. T. Pacheco  and
L. C. Federizzi
C. M. Zimmer*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, 7712 Bento Gonçalves Avenue, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
I. P. Ubert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, 7712 Bento Gonçalves Avenue, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
M. T. Pacheco
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, 7712 Bento Gonçalves Avenue, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
L. C. Federizzi
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, 7712 Bento Gonçalves Avenue, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multiflorous spikelets are found in oat Avena sativa L. subsp. nudisativa, which is characterised by elongated rachilla and variable number of florets per spikelet. One of the main factors limiting the exploration of multiflorous spikelets in oats, aiming to produce naked grains, is its variable expressivity. This work aimed to detect the environmental influence on the variable expressivity of multiflorous spikelet formation in oats and to estimate the heritability of this trait by analysing its expression in lower, middle and upper third of the panicle in 94 inbred lines of two crosses each. Two populations of recombinant inbred lines were screened for the spikelet formation in 2 years and sowing dates under field experiments. The results demonstrate that the variable expressivity of the multiflorous spikelet formation was highly influenced by the environmental conditions. The variable expressivity varied according to the genetic background, as well as the panicle third where spikelets were produced. The upper third of the panicle showed greater stability for the multiflorous spikelet formation, which is confirmed by the highest heritability coefficients observed in this third, regardless of the assessed population. Our results provide substantial evidences of the contribution exerted by environmental conditions in multiflorous spikelet formation in oats.

Keywords

Naked oatsIndeterminate spikeletsHeritability
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 55 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 829 - 842
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, R.H. and Bregitzer, P. (2011). A Ds insertional mutant of a barley miR172 gene results in indeterminate spikelet development. Crop Science 51, 1664–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhtz, A., Springer, F., Chappell, L., Baulcombe, D.C. and Kehr, J. (2008). Identification and characterization of small RNAs from phloem of Brassica napus . Plant Journal 53, 739–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuck, G., Cigan, A.M., Saeteurn, K. and Hake, S. (2007a). The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nature Genetics 39, 544–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuck, G., Meeley, R.B. and Hake, S. (1998). The control of maize spikelet meristem fate by the APETALA2-like gene indeterminate spikelet1 . Genes and Development 12, 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuck, G., Meeley, R. and Hake, S. (2008). Floral meristem initiation and meristem cell fate are regulated by the maize AP2 genes ids1 and sid1 . Development 135, 3013–3019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuck, G., Meeley, R., Irish, E., Sakai, H. and Hake, S. (2007b). The maize tasselseed4 microRNA controls sex determination and meristem cell fate by targeting Tasselseed6/indeterminate spikelet1 . Nature Genetics 39, 1517–1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J.M., Murphy, E.A., Brown, A.S., Carmichael, M.D., Ghaffar, A. and Mayer, E.P. (2004). Effects of moderate exercise and oat beta-glucan on innate immune function and susceptibility to respiratory infection. American Journal of Physiology 286, R366–R375.Google ScholarPubMed
Jung, J., Seo, Y., Seo, P.J., Reyes, J.L., Yun, J., Chua, N. and Parka, C. (2007). The GIGANTEA-regulated microRNA172 mediates photoperiodic flowering independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 2736–2748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawes, D.A. and Boland, P. (1974). Effect of temperature on the expression of the naked grain character in oats. Euphytica 23, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., Lee, J., Moon, S., Park, S.Y. and An, G. (2007). The rice heterochronic gene SUPERNUMERARY BRACT regulates the transition from spikelet meristem to floral meristem. Plant Journal 49, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D.Y. and An, G. (2012). Two AP2 family genes, SUPERNUMERARY BRACT (SNB) and OsINDETERMINATE SPIKELET1 (OsIDS1), synergistically control inflorescence architecture and floral meristem establishment in rice. Plant Journal 69, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H., Yoo, S.J., Lee, J.H., Kim, W., Yoo, S.K., Fitzgerald, H., Carrington, J.C. and Ahn, J.H. (2010). Genetic framework for flowering-time regulation by ambient temperature-responsive miRNAs in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Research 38, 3081–3093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, R.H. (2007). Whole grain phytochemicals and health. Journal of Cereal Science 46, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, H.H. and McRostie, G.P. (1919). The inheritance of hull-lessness in oat hybrids. The American Naturalist 53, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ougham, H.J., Latipova, G. and Valentine, J. (1996). Morphological and biochemical characterization of spikelet development in naked oats (Avena sativa). New Phytologist 134, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennell, A.L. and Halloran, G.M. (1984). Influence of time of sowing, photoperiod, and temperature on supernumerary spikelet expression in wheat. Canadian Journal of Botany 62, 1687–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellizzaro, K., Nava, I.C., Chao, S., Pacheco, M.T. and Federizzi, L.C. (2016). Genetics and identification of markers linked to multiflorous spikelet in hexaploid oat. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 16, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kirkkari, A.M. and Jauhiainen, L. (2004). Characterising strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in producing naked oat as a novel crop for northern growing conditions. Agricultural and Food Science 13, 212–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poursarebani, N., Seidensticker, T., Koppolu, R., Trautewig, C., Gawronski, P., Bini, F., Govind, G., Rutten, T., Sakuma, S., Tagiri, A., Wolde, G.M., Youssef, H.M., Battal, A., Ciannamea, S., Fusca, T., Nussbaumer, T., Pozzi, C., Börner, A., Lundqvist, U., Komatsuda, T., Salvi, S., Tuberosa, R., Uauy, C., Sreenivasulu, N., Rossini, L. and Schnurbusch, T. (2015). The genetic basis of composite spike form in barley and “miracle-wheat”. Genetics 201, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, M.D., Martens, J.W., McKenzie, R.I.H., Nishiyama, I., Sadanaga, K., Sebesta, J. and Thomas, H. (1978). Oats: A Standardized System of Nomenclature for Genes and Chromosomes and Catalog of Genes Governing Characters. Washington, DC: USDA, Agriculture Handbook 509.Google Scholar
Suzuki, C., Tanaka, W. and Hirano, H. (2015). Analysis of a rice fickle spikelet1 mutant that displays an increase in flower and spikelet organ number with inconstant expressivity. Genes and Genetic System 90, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ubert, I.P., Zimmer, C.M., Pellizzaro, K., Federizzi, L.C. and Nava, I.C. (2017). Genetics and molecular mapping of the naked grains in hexaploid oat. Euphytica 213, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. (1995). Naked oats. In The Oat Crop: Production and Utilization, 505–532 (Ed Welch, R.W.). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Vencovsky, R. and Barriga, P. (1992). Genética biométrica no fitomelhoramento. Ribeirão Preto: Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, Ribeirão Preto.Google Scholar
Yoo, B., Kragler, F., Varkonyi-Gasic, E., Haywood, V., Archer-Evans, S., Lee, Y.M., Lough, T.J. and Lucasa, W.J. (2004). A systemic small RNA signaling system in plants. Plant Cell 16, 1979–2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Q., Upadhyaya, N.M., Gubler, F. and Helliwell, C.A. (2009). Over-expression of miR172 causes loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biology 9, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, C.M., Ubert, I.P., Pellizzaro, K., Federizzi, L.C. and Nava, I.C. (2017). Genetic and molecular characterization of multiflorous spikelet in oat. Genetics and Molecular Research 16, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Zimmer et al. supplementary material

Zimmer et al. supplementary material 1

Download Zimmer et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 2.3 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Zimmer et al. supplementary material

Zimmer et al. supplementary material 2

Download Zimmer et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 38.3 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Zimmer et al. supplementary material

Zimmer et al. supplementary material 3

Download Zimmer et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 19.5 MB