Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T05:47:53.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variability in Commercial Sweet Potatoes (Ipomoea Batatas—L. Lam) in Trinidad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. H. Haynes
Affiliation:
The University of the West Indies, Trinidad, W.I.
D. W. Wholey
Affiliation:
The University of the West Indies, Trinidad, W.I.

Summary

The variation in number and yield of tubers from three commercial fields of sweet potato was measured over three seasons. Sources of variation were attributed to factors external to the plant, such as soil, management and climatic differences, and to inherent plant factors, including type of planting material. It is suggested that a reduction in variability could lead to increases in productivity, and may also increase the precision of field experimentation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, D. T. A. (1962). In MacDonald, A. S. (1963), Field Crop Abstracts 16, 119.Google Scholar
Anon. (1940). Malay agric. J. 28, 221.Google Scholar
Boswell, V. R. (1950). Fmrs' Bull. 2020, U.S. Dep. of Agric.Google Scholar
Fielden, G. (1940). Techn. Comm. 13, East Mailing: Commonwealth Bur. Hort.Google Scholar
Galang, F. C. (1932). Philippine J. Agric. 3, 91.Google Scholar
Haynes, P. H. & Thomas, S. M. (1967). Bull 4, Texaco Food Crops Demonstration Farm.Google Scholar
Milthorpe, F. C. (1967). Proc. Int. Symp. Trop. Root. Crops, I, 2, 1.Google Scholar
Steinbauer, C. E., Hoffman, G. P. & Edmond, J. B. (1943). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 43, 249.Google Scholar
Van Den Abeele, M. & Vandenput, R. (1958). Cultures du Congo Belge, 113; Bruxelles Govt Publ.Google Scholar
Wood, R. C. (1937). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 5, 231.Google Scholar