Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:09:18.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards the Reliable Prediction of Time to Flowering in Six Annual Crops. V. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. H. Ellis ,
R. J. Lawn ,
R. J. Summerfield ,
A. Qi ,
E. H. Roberts ,
P. M. Chay ,
J. B. Brouwer ,
J. L. Rose ,
S. J. Yeates  and
S. Sandover
R. H. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AD, England
R. J. Lawn
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, The Cunningham Laboratory, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4067, Australia
R. J. Summerfield
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AD, England
A. Qi
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AD, England
E. H. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Plant Environment Laboratory, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AD, England
P. M. Chay
Affiliation:
CSIRO Davies Laboratory, Private Mail Bag, PO Aitkenvale, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia
J. B. Brouwer
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Victoria 3401, Australia
J. L. Rose
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Hermitage Research Station, via Warwick, Queensland 4370, Australia
S. J. Yeates
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, PO Box 1346, Katherine, Northern Territory 0851, Australia
S. Sandover
Affiliation:
Western Australia Department of Agriculture, PO Box 19, Kununurra Regional Office, Western Australia 6743
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four genotypes of ‘desi’ and two of ‘kabuli’ chickpea (Cicer arietinum) were sown at six locations in Australia on various dates between 1986 and 1988, giving 22 combinations of site and sowing date with diverse photothermal environments. Times from sowing to first flowering (f) varied from 30 to 162 d, mean pre-flowering temperatures from 10.8° to 29.3°C and mean photoperiods from 11.3 to 15.6 h d−1. There was no evidence that any observation had been obtained in photoperiods shorter than the ceiling photoperiod (Pcc) or longer than the critical photoperiod (Pc). This suggests that, in typical agricultural environments, chickpea crops experience photoperiods (P) which should satisfy the condition Pcce < P < Pc. In one ‘kabuli’ and two ‘desi’ genotypes, 1/f was influenced by both temperature and photoperiod. The coefficient of determination (R2) for a linear, additive rate of development model ranged from 0.74 to 0.80, with no significant difference in either temperature sensitivity or photoperiod sensitivity among these three genotypes. In the remaining three genotypes, no significant response to temperature was detected between 10.8° and 29.2°C, so rate of progress to flowering was influenced solely by photoperiod. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of 1/f to P among these three genotypes. The linear, additive rate model found here to be so satisfactory as a predictive tool for phenology, is also shown to have much wider general application.

Predicción del liempo de floración

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 271 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beech, D. F. & Brinsmead, R. (1980). Tyson: a chickpea (Cicer arietinum (L.)) cultivar for grain production. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 46:127–129.Google Scholar
Cook, L. (1987). Voluntary register of grain legume cultivars in Australia—chickpea cv. Dooen. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 53:128.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Lawn, R. J., Summerfield, R. J., Qi, A., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L. & Yeates, S. J. (1994a). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. III. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Experimental Agriculture 30:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H., Lawn, R. J., Summerfield, R. J., Qi, A., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L., Yeates, S. J. & Sandover, S. (1994b). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. IV. Cultivated and wild mungbean. Experimental Agriculture 30:31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshel, Y. (1967). Effect of sowing date on growth and seed yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Israel Journal of Agricultural Research 17:193–197.Google Scholar
Goodspeed, M. J. (1975). Computer routine for solar position, daylength and related quantities. Technical Memorandum No. 75/11, CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources.Google Scholar
Landsberg, J. J. (1977). Some useful equations for biological studies. Experimental Agriculture 13:273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, K. K. & Chinoy, J. J. (1960). Effects of vernalization & photoperiodic treatment on Cicer arietinum. I. Phasic development in relation to its photo and thermic quanta. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 3:32–44.Google Scholar
Pala, M. & Mazid, A. (1992). On-farm assessment of improved crop production practices in north west Syria. I. Chickpea. Experimental Agriculture 28:175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J., Minchin, F. R. & Hadley, P. (1980). Phenology of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) in contrasting aerial environments. Experimental Agriculture 16:343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. H., Hadley, P. & Summerfield, R. J. (1985). Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Annals of Botany 55:881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, N. P., Natarajan, M. & Reddy, M. S. (1983). Chickpea, pigeonpe and groundnut. In Potential Productivity of Field Crops Under Different Environments, 218–305. International Rice Research Institute: Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. & Sonakiya, V. K. (1990). Impact of thermal and heliothermal requirements of chickpea cultivars on phenological changes and productivity. Research and Development Reporter 7:41–46.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, A. R. & Saxena, N. P. (1979). Growth and development of chickpeas under progressive moisture stress. In Stress Physiology in Crop Plants (Eds Mussell, H. and Staples, R. C.), 465–483. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Singh, P. (1991). Influence of water-deficits on phenology, growth and dry-matter allocation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Field Crops Research 28:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, J. B., Thompson, J. A. & Summerfield, R. J. (1985). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In Grain Legume Crops, 312–390. (Eds Summerfield, R. J. and Roberts, E. H.). London: Collins.Google Scholar
Strang, J. (1980). Voluntary register of grain legume cultivars in Australia—chickpea cv. Opal. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 44:263.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J. & Roberts, E. H. (1985). Cicer arietinum. In Handbook of Flowering, Volum. I, 92–99. (Ed. Halevy, A. H.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Minchin, F. R., Roberts, E. H. & Hadley, P. (1981). Adaptation to contrasting aerial environments in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 58:97–113.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Hadley, P., Roberts, E. H., Minchin, F. R. & Rawsthorne, S. (1984). Sensitivity of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) to hot temperatures during the reproductive period. Experimental Agriculture 20:77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H. & Hadley, P. (1987). Photothermal effects on flowering in chickpea and other grain legumes. In Proceedings of the Consultants' Workshop on Adaptation of Chickpea and Pigeonpea to Abiotic Stresses, 33–48. India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Ellis, R. H. & Roberts, E. H. (1989). Vernalization in chickpea (Cicer arietinum): Fact or artefact? Annals of Botany 64:599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Roberts, E. H., Ellis, R. H. & Lawn, R. J. (1991). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. I. The development of simple models for fluctuating field environments. Experimental Agriculture 27:11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, R. J., Lawn, R. J., Qi, A., Ellis, R. H., Roberts, E. H., Chay, P. M., Brouwer, J. B., Rose, J. L., Shanmugasundaram, S., Yeates, S. J. & Sandover, S. (1993). Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. II. Soyabean (Glycine max). Experimental Agriculture 29:253–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. H. & Saxena, N. P. (1991). The use of non-destructive measurement and physiological models of yield determination to investigate factors determining differences in seed yield between genotypes of “deli” chickpeas (Cicer arietinum). Annals of Applied Biology 119:105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar