Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:07:29.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOWARDS A REGIME CHANGE IN THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SEED SUPPLY SYSTEM IN CHINA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2012

JINGSONG LI ,
JANICE JIGGINS ,
EDITH T. LAMMERTS VAN BUEREN  and
CEES LEEUWIS
JINGSONG LI*
Affiliation:
Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Jia 11, Datun Road, Anwai, Beijing 100101, China Communication and Innovation Studies Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen Campus, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, the Netherlands
JANICE JIGGINS
Affiliation:
Communication and Innovation Studies Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen Campus, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, the Netherlands
EDITH T. LAMMERTS VAN BUEREN
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University, Wageningen Campus, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands
CEES LEEUWIS
Affiliation:
Communication and Innovation Studies Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen Campus, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, the Netherlands
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper explores changes in the organization of seed supply in China over the last decade by means of a multi-level institutional analysis. At the landscape level, the implications for China of the regulation of plant genetic resources through various international treaties and conventions are reviewed in the light of the evolution of the global seed industry. At the regime level, the transition in the Chinese context to market-based seed supply and the development of commercial and public seed sectors are examined. The study then analyses trends in seed supply at the niche level, with reference to participatory maize (Zea mays L.) breeding in three provinces in southwest China where high rural poverty persists. This work offers radical novelty in variety development and seed provision on behalf of smallholder farmers. However, a series of technical, organizational and market ‘mismatches’ are demonstrated within the existing seed regime. The participatory work emphasizes breeding for diverse cultivars adapted to specific ecosystems but these are prevented from reaching commercial markets by existing varietal testing procedures. Participatory breeding has potential to address farmers’ varietal needs as agriculture modernises and to support the public function of research institutes, but within mainstream intellectual property regimes the public value of participatory breeding cannot be accommodated adequately. Yet, when coupled to institutional innovations for recognising intellectual property and sharing benefit among all those who contribute, participatory breeding may initiate a powerful dynamics for change within seed regimes and a sui generis seed system suited to the Chinese context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 114 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashby, J. A. (2009). The impact of participatory plant breeding. In Plant Breeding and Farmer Participation, 649–671 (Eds Ceccarelli, S., Guimaraes, E. P. and Weltzien, E.). Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (1992). Convention on biological diversity, article 8(j): Traditional knowledge, innovations and practices. Available at http://www.cbd.int/traditional/ (accessed 18 February 2012).Google Scholar
Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy (CCAP). (2009). Access and Benefit-Sharing Issues on Participatory Plant Breeding and Innovations in Practice in Southwest China. Project report, unpublished results. Beijing, China: Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy.Google Scholar
Chable, V., Thommens, A., Goldringer, I., Infante, T. V., Levillain, T. and Lammerts van Bueren, E. T. (2009). Report on the definitions of varieties in Europe, of local adaptation, and of varieties threathened by genetic erosion, by project Farm Seed Opportunities: opportunities for farm seed conservation, breeding and production, Feb 1, 2009. Available at http://www.farmseed.net (accessed 18 February 2012).Google Scholar
Deuten, J. J. (2003). Cosmopolitanising Technology: A Study of Four Emerging Technological Regimes. Enschede, Netherlands: Twente University Press.Google Scholar
de Schutter, O. (2009). The Right to Food. Seed Policies and the Right to Food: Enhancing Agro-Biodiversity, Encouraging Innovation. Report A/64/170, presented at the 64th Session of the UN General Assembly 2009. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Dong, J. (2009). The Penetration of Transnational Seed Companies in China, vol. 2009. Beijing, China: Xinhua Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Drahos, P. (2010). The Global Governance of Knowledge: Patent Offices and Their Clients. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evenson, R. E. and Gollin, D. (2003). Crop Variety Improvement and Its Effect on Productivity: The Impact of International Agricultural Research. Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Falcon, W. P. and Fowler, C. (2002). Carving up the commons – emergence of a new international regime for germplasm development and transfer. Food Policy 27 (3):197–222.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2006). Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: the transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970). Technovation 26 (9):999–1016.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36 (3):399–417.Google Scholar
GRAIN (2009). ITPGR: Farmers’ rights or a fools bargain? Available at http://www.grain.org/article/entries/786-itpgr-farmers-rights-or-a-fools-bargain (accessed 18 February 2012).Google Scholar
Gyawali, S., Sthapit, B. R., Bhandari, B., Bajracharya, J., Shrestha, P. K., Upadhyay, M. P. and Jarvis, D. I. (2010). Participatory crop improvement and formal release of Jethobudho rice landrace in Nepal. Euphytica 176 (1):59–78.Google Scholar
Howard, P. H. (2009). Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability 1:1266–1287.Google Scholar
ITPGRFA (2004). International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, J. R. (2005). First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Leeuwis, C. and Aarts, N. (2011). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: creating space for change in complex systems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17 (1):21–36.Google Scholar
Li, J., Jiggins, J. and Lammerts van Bueren, E. T. (2008). Workshop Report on Participatory Plant Breeding and UPOV 91 in China. Unpublished results. Netherlands: Departments of Plant Breeding and Communication and Innovation Studies, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Li, J., Lammerts van Bueren, E. T., Jiggins, J. and Leeuwis, C. (2012a). Farmers’ adoption of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and the persistence of landraces in Southwest China: implications for policy and breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59 (6):1147–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Leeuwis, C., Lammerts van Bueren, E. T., Song, Y. and Jiggins, J. (2012b). Contribution of action researching to institutional innovation: a case study of access and benefit sharing (ABS) mechanisms in the participatory plant breeding (PPB) in Southwest China. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 9:(3/4) (in press).Google Scholar
Liu, C. and Jiang, J. (2010). Seed Industry in China: Emerging Small and Medium-Sized Domestic Enterprises and the Expanding of Transnational Companies, Vol. 2010. Beijing, China: People's Daily Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lorenzetti, F. and Negri, V. (2009). The European seed legislation on conservation varieties. In European Landraces: On-Farm Conservation, Management and Use, 287–295 (Eds Veteläinen, M., Negri, V. and Maxted, N.). Rome, Italy: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
Louwaars, N. P. (2007). Seed of confusion: the impact of policies on seed systems. PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, M. and Busch, L. (2006). Seeds of change: intellectual property rights, genetically modified soybeans and seed saving in the United Sates. Sociologia Ruralis 46 (2):122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MoA (2010). Database of the Application and Granted Plant Breeders’ Rights in China, from 1999 to 2010. Beijing, China: IPR Office of Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Morris, M. L. and Bellon, M. R. (2004). Participatory plant breeding research: oportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica 136 (1):21–35.Google Scholar
Raven, R. (2004). Conceptual framework, chapter 2. In Strategic Niche Management for Biomass. A Comparative Study on the Experimental Introduction of Bioenergy Technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark, 25–57. PhD dissertation, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Rey, F., Fontaine, L., Osman, A. and van Waes, J. (2008). Value for cultivation and use testing of organic cereal varieties: what are the key issues? In Proceedings of the COST ACTION 860 – SUSVAR and ECO-PB workshop, 28–29 February 2008, Brussels, Belgium. France: ITAB. http://www.eco-pb.org (accessed 18 February 2012).Google Scholar
Song, Y. (2003). Formal system and farmers’ system: the impact of maize germplasm in Southwest China. In Agricultural Research and Poverty Reduction: Some Issues and Evidence, 189–204 (Eds Mathur, S. and Pachico, D.). Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).Google Scholar
Song, M. (2010). International background and latest development of access and benefit sharing arrangements in the plant genetic resources sector in China. In International Seminar Report on Plant Variety Protection and Farmers’ Rights and Interests, Vol. 1, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China: China Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, C. S. (2003). Concentration in ownershipof plant variety rights: some implications for developing countries. Food Policy 28 (5–6):519–546.Google Scholar
Tansey, G. (2008). Farming, food and global rules. In The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity and Food Security, 3–26 (Eds Tansey, G. and Rajotte, T.). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Visser, B. (2002). An agrobiodiversity perspective on seed policies. Journal of New Seeds 4 (1–2):231–245.Google Scholar
Volkening, T. (2006). Seed savers exchange. Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 7 (2–3):3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. (2005). A Study on the integration of Chinese seed industry. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Xue, D. (2011). Analysis for the main elements and potential impacts of Nagoya Protocol. Biodiversity Science 19 (1):113–119 (in Chinese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. (2010). Chinese seed industry in transition. In Earth Biweekly, Vol. 2010. Beijing, China: People's Daily Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar