Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:49:18.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Three Olive Varieties to Soil Salinity in Israel*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Nehama Bidner-Barhava  and
B. Ramati
Nehama Bidner-Barhava
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Rehovot, Israel
B. Ramati
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An investigation was undertaken on the relative tolerance to salinity of the olive varieties Manzanillo, Souri and Sigoise in the arid zone of Israel (Negev), in an experimental grove of the Jewish National Fund, using 11-year-old trees that were grown on saline and non-saline soils under irrigation with sewage water. Manzanillo was the most sensitive to salinity, yields and development of trunk, crown and root system all being adversely affected. Sigoise was the most tolerant to salinity and vegetative development was not impaired at all. Souri was intermediate in sensitivity to salinity. In spite of the susceptibility of Manzanillo it is preferred because of its high yield, which was greater even on a saline soil than yields of the other two varieties on non-saline soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 295 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anagstopolus, P. T., Chryssoneris, F. P. & Bathis, E. S. (1955). Publ. Superior School Agric., Athens (Host. Abstr. 26, 4118).Google Scholar
Bidner-Barhava, N. & Ramati, B. (1967). Israel J. of Agric. Res. 17, 65.Google Scholar
Goor, A., Spiegel, P. & Gratgh, H. (1960). Dept. of Horticulture, Israel Min. of Agric. Tel Aviv (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mantel, N. (1951). Am. Statistn 5, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, S. C. (1911). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 192 (Abstr. in Exp. Sta. Rec.) (1911) 24, 442. Washington, D.C.: Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ozerov, G. C. (1949). Dok. Akad. Nauk SSSR 69: (5) as cited in Shakhov, A. A. (1956), 150. Moscow: AN. SSSR.Google Scholar
Ozerov, (1950). Dok. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1950, 72, 409 (Hort. Abstr. 21, 1389).Google Scholar
Ravikovitch, S. (1960). Soils of Israel. Rehovot: The Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agric. (Hebrew, with English summary).Google Scholar
Richards, L. A. (1947). Agric. Engng 28, 451.Google Scholar
Shakhov, A. A. (1956). Soleustoichivost Rastenii, 419. Moscow: AN. SSSR.Google Scholar
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954). Handb. U.S. Dep. Agric. No. 60, Washington.Google Scholar
Vinik, L. (1938). Jedeoth 4, 14 (Hebrew).Google Scholar