Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:12:13.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Effects of Soil Compaction on Root Growth and Water Use of Lettuce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. K. V. Carr
Affiliation:
National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford, MK45 4DTEngland
Sara M. Dodds
Affiliation:
National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford, MK45 4DTEngland

Summary

A technique for observing the effects of soil physical and other factors on root growth was evaluated, using glass tubes packed with soil. The number of root intersections observed on a grid at the interface between the soil and glass was correlated with the number of root ends counted within the soil core. Comparatively small differences in the dry bulk density of a structureless sandy loam (1.25 and 1.50 g cm−3) had much larger effects than differential watering treatments on the pattern of root growth of lettuces (Lactuca sativa). Loosening the soil to depth (with additional fertilizer) increased the availability of water, under both wet and dry conditions, and improved water use efficiency, primarily through effects on root activity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Böhm, W. (1974). Mini-rhizotrons for root observations under field conditions. Z. Acker Pflanzenbau 140:282287.Google Scholar
Böhm, W. (1979). Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecological Studies 33. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. (1977). Soil aeration and compaction in relation to root growth and soil management. Applied Biology 2:186.Google Scholar
Cox, E. F. (1980). Growth of lettuce roots and its possible relationship to tipburn development. Horticultural Research 20:6166.Google Scholar
Drew, M. C., Ellis, F. B., Barnes, B. T. & Saker, L. R. (1977). The study of root distribution in field experiments. Agricultural Research Council, Letcombe Laboratory Annual Report for 1976: 3337.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. M., Gooderham, P. T. & Ingram, J. (1975). The effect on the yields of barley and kale of soil conditions induced by cultivation at high moisture content. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambridge) 85:385393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, R. J. & Spoor, G. (1981). The design and performance of equipment for the subsoil placement of fertilizer. Paper No. 81–1091, Summer Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Cleaver, T. J., Turner, M. K., Hunt, J., Niendorf, K. B. & Loquens, S. M. H. (1980). Comparison of the effects of phosphate fertilizer on the yield, phosphate content and quality of 22 different vegetable and agricultural crops. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 95:457469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J. (1979). A periscope method for observing root growth and distribution in field soil. Journal of Experimental Botany 30:205214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. G. M., Reeve, M. J., Thomasson, A. J. & Wright, V. F. (1977). Water Retention, Porosity and Density of Field Soils. Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 9, Harpenden, England.Google Scholar
John, J. A. & Quenouille, M. H. (1977). Experiments: Design and Analysis (2nd Edition). London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Maurya, P. R. & Lai, R. (1979). Effects of bulk density and soil moisture on radicle elongation of some tropical crops. In Soil Physical Properties and Crop Production in the Tropics, 339348 (Eds Lai, R. and Greenland, D. J.). London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
McEwen, J. & Johnston, A. E. (1979). The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizer on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambridge) 92:695702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. D. V. (1981). Estimation of retail price changes. The Statistician 30:8996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, H. R. (1974). The effect of irrigation on the length, weight and diameter of lettuce roots. Plant and Soil 40:381391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, H. R. & Stone, D. A. (1980). Deep cultivation of a sandy clay loam. I. Effects on growth, yield and nutrient content of potatoes, broad beans, summer cabbage and red beet in 1977. Soil and Tillage Research 1:5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, H. R. & Stone, D. A. (1981). Deep cultivation of a sandy clay loam. II. Effects on soil hydraulic properties and on root growth, water extraction and water stress in 1977, especially of broad beans. Soil and Tillage Research 1:173185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R. S. (1977). Plant Root Systems: their Function and Interaction with the Soil. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Soane, B. D., Dickson, J. W. & Campbell, D. J. (1982). Compaction by agricultural vehicles: a review. III. Incidence and control of compaction in crop production. Soil and Tillage Research 2:336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoor, G. & Godwin, R. J. (1978). An experimental investigation into the deep loosening of soil by rigid tines. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 23:243258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, P. (1969). Models in Regression and Related Topics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology 63:9951001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warboys, I. B., Gooderham, P. T., Wilkes, J. M. & Wilkins, S. M. (1976). The development of a double digging machine. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation,Uppsala, Sweden 46:146.Google Scholar