Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:51:52.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOCIAL AND GENDER PERSPECTIVES IN RICE BREEDING FOR SUBMERGENCE TOLERANCE IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2013

D. O. MANZANILLA ,
T. R. PARIS ,
G. T. TATLONGHARI ,
A. M. TOBIAS ,
T. T. N. CHI ,
N. T. PHUONG ,
I. SILIPHOUTHONE ,
V. CHAMARERK ,
P. BHEKASUT  and
R. GANDASOEMITA
D. O. MANZANILLA*
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
T. R. PARIS
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
G. T. TATLONGHARI
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
A. M. TOBIAS
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
T. T. N. CHI
Affiliation:
Cuu Long Delta Rice Research Institute (CLRRI), Cantho City, Vietnam
N. T. PHUONG
Affiliation:
Agriculture Science Institute for Southern Coastal Central of Vietnam (ASISOV), Binh Dinh, Vietnam
I. SILIPHOUTHONE
Affiliation:
National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), Vientiane, Lao PDR
V. CHAMARERK
Affiliation:
Ubon Ratchathani Rice Research Center (URRC), Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
P. BHEKASUT
Affiliation:
Prachinburi Rice Research Center (PRRC), Prachinburi, Thailand
R. GANDASOEMITA
Affiliation:
Indonesian Center for Food Crops Research and Development (ICFORD), Bogor, Indonesia
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The risks of flooding in rice production include losses that can affect some 13 million ha of rice lands in Southeast Asia. This study integrated social and gender perspectives into the varietal evaluation process to contribute to planned faster uptake of submergence-tolerant rice (Sub1) varieties. In this study, the participatory varietal selection (PVS) process was used in eliciting male and female farmers' opinions with respect to selecting popular varieties with the SUB1 gene introgressed, for added tolerance of flash floods of up to two weeks. Fifteen Sub1 varieties and the farmers' local check were tested under the PVS researcher-managed (PVS-RM) trials, which involved farmers' preference analysis (PA). The farmers tested the pre-selected lines with the SUB1 gene in their own fields to further evaluate their performance under varying conditions. During flooding, farmers experienced lower production depending on water depth, timing with respect to rice growth stage, duration, frequency of occurrence and quality. On-farm PA results showed wide variability in the performance of the Sub1 varieties compared with local popular varieties. This implies the need for further testing of pre-released lines in terms of adaptability and the continuous development of rice genotypes for varying flood-prone rice ecosystems. Women are as knowledgeable as men because of the significant roles they play in rice production and food preparation. Moreover, farmers and breeders have almost the same criteria in choosing the best performing rice lines. Sensory tests revealed the eating and cooking qualities important to farmers. The findings of this study can provide feedback to breeding programmes to ensure a greater likelihood of adoption and ultimately increasing rice productivity in submergence-prone rice areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 191 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adesina, A. A. and Baidu-Forson, J. (1995). Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics 13:1–9.Google Scholar
Almekinders, C. J. M. and Elings, A. (2001). Collaboration of farmers and breeders: participatory crop improvement in perspective. Euphytica 122:425–438.Google Scholar
Courtois, B., Bartholome, B., Chaudhary, D., McLaren, G., Misra, C. H., Mandal, N. P., Pandey, S., Paris, T., Piggin, C., Prasad, K., Roy, A. T., Sahu, R. K., Sahu, V. N., Sarkarung, S., Sharma, S. K., Singh, A., Singh, H. N., Singh, O. N., Singh, N. K., Singh, R. K., Singh, R. K., Singh, S., Sinha, P. K., Sisodia, B. V. S. and Takhur, R. (2001). Comparing farmers' and breeders’ rankings in varietal selection for low-input environments: a case study of rainfed rice in Eastern India. Euphytica 122:537–550.Google Scholar
Courtois, B., Singh, R. K., Pandey, S., Paris, T., Sarkarung, S., Baghel, S. S., Sahu, R. K., Sahu, V. N., Sharma, S. K., Singh, H. N., Singh, A., Singh, O. N., Sisodia, B. V. S., Misra, C. H., Roy, J. K., Chaudary, D., Prasad, K., Singh, R. K., Sinha, P. K. and Mandal, N. P. (2000). Breeding better rice varieties through farmer participation: some early lessons from Eastern India. In Assessing the Impact of Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, 212–230 (Eds Ashby, J. A. and Lilja, N.).Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Efisue, A., Tongoona, P., Derera, J., Langyintuo, A., Laing, M. and Ubi, B. (2008). Farmers' perceptions on rice varieties in Sikasso Region of Mali and their implications for rice breeding. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194:393–400.Google Scholar
Halaswamy, B. H., Gowda, B. T. S., Seetharam, A., Virk, D. S. and Witcombe, J. R. (2001). Participatory varietal selection in finger millet: an exchange of experiences from South and South East Asia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement, Pokhara, Nepal, 1–5 May 2000. Cali, Colombia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture, 459 pp.Google Scholar
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). (2011). GRiSP Annual Report. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Ismail, A. M., Vergara, G. V. and Mackill, D. J. (2008). Towards enhanced and sustained rice productivity in flood-prone areas of South and Southeast Asia. Keynote Paper Presented at the Indonesia National Rice Seminar, Sukamandi, Indonesia, 23 July 2008.Google Scholar
Joshi, G. R. and Pandey, S. (2006). Farmers' perceptions and adoption of modern rice varieties in Nepal. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 45 (2):171–186.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. and Witcombe, J. R. (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Experience Agriculture 32:461–477.Google Scholar
Mackill, D. J., Collard, B. C. Y., Neeraja, C. N., Rodriguez, R. M., Heuer, S. and Ismail, A. M. (2006). QTLs in rice breeding: examples for abiotic stresses. In Rice Genetics 5, Proceedings of the International Rice Genetics Symposium, 155–167 (Eds Brar, D. S., Mackill, D. J. and Hardy, B.). Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Maclean, J. L., Dawe, D. C., Hardy, B. and Hettel, G. P. (Eds.) (2002). Rice Almanac: Source Book for the Most Important Economic Activity on Earth. Oxon, IK: CABI. (In association with International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines; West Africa Rice Development Association, Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire; International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, Colombia; and Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy), 253 pp.Google Scholar
Manzanilla, D. O., Paris, T. R., Vergara, G. V., Ismail, A. M., Pandey, S., Labios, R. V., Tatlonghari, G. T., Acda, R. D., Chi, T. T. N., Duoangsila, K., Siliphouthone, I., Manikmas, M. O. A. and Mackill, D. J. (2011). Submergence risks and farmers' preferences: implications for breeding Sub1 rice in Southeast Asia. Agriculture Systems 104:335–347.Google Scholar
Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Behrman, J., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Wilde, V., Noordeloos, M., Ragasa, C. and Beintema, N. (2010). Engendering agricultural research. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 00973, Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, May 2010.Google Scholar
Morris, M. L. and Doss, C. R. (1999). How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Paper Presented as a Selected Paper at the Annual Meeting, American Agricultural Economics Association (AAEA), Nashville, TN, 8–11 August.Google Scholar
Nugraha, Y. and Sasmita, P. (2012, April). Extending flood-tolerant rice varieties in Indonesia. CURE Matters. 2 (1):10. (Newsletter of the Consortium for Unfavorable Rice Environments (CURE), International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)).Google Scholar
Pandey, S., Gauchan, D., Malabayabas, M., Bool-Emerick, M. and Hardy, B. (Eds). (2012). Patterns of Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties and Farm-level Impacts in Stress-prone Rainfed Areas in South Asia. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institure (IRRI), 318 pp.Google Scholar
Paris, T. R., Manzanilla, D. O., Tatlonghari, G. T. and Labios, R. V. (2011). Guide to Participatory Varietal Selection for Submergence-Tolerant Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 111 pp.Google Scholar
Paris, T. R., Singh, R. K., Atlin, G., Sarkarung, S., McLaren, G., Courtois, B., Mc Allister, K., Piggin, C., Pandey, S., Singh, A., Singh, H. N., Singh, O. N., Singh, S., Singh, R. K., Mandal, N. P., Prasad, K., Sahu, R. K., Sahu, V. N., Sharma, M. L., Singh, R. K. P., Thakur, R., Singh, N. K., Chaudhary, D. and Ram, S. (2002). Farmer participatory breeding and participatory varietal selection in Eastern India: lessons learned. In Breeding Rainfed Rice for Drought-Prone Environments: Integrating Conventional and Participatory Plant Breeding in South and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of a DFID Plant Sciences Research Programme/IRRI Conference, 12–15 March (Eds Witcombe, J. R., Parr, L. B., Atlin, G. N.). Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI.Google Scholar
Paris, T. R., Singh, A., Cueno, A. D. and Singh, V. N. (2008). Assessing the impact of participatory research in rice breeding on women farmers: a case study in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Experience Agriculture 44:97–112.Google Scholar
Paris, T. R., Singh, A. and Luis, J. (2001a). Listening to male and female farmers in rice varietal selection: a case in Eastern India. An exchange of experiences from South and Southeast Asia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement, Pokhara, Nepal, 1–5 May 2000. Cali, Colombia: Centreo Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.Google Scholar
Paris, T. R., Singh, A., Luis, J., Singh, H. N., Singh, O. N., Singh, S., Singh, Singh, R. K. and Sarkarung, S. (2001b). Listening to the farmers' perceptions through participatory rice varietal selection: a case study in villages in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. In An Exchange of Experiences from South and South East Asia: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement, Pokhara, Nepal, 1–5 May 2000. Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 459 pp.Google Scholar
Paris, T. R., Singh, A., Singh, V. N. and Ram, P. C. (2006). Mainstreaming social and gender concerns in participatory rice varietal improvement for rainfed environments in Eastern India. In Paper Presented at the International Symposium on Participatory Breeding and Knowledge Management for Strengthening Rural Livelihoods, M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India, 17–19 July.Google Scholar
Rana, B. S., Kaul, S. L., Appaji, C., Parbhakar, K., N. S., Reddy, B. V. S., Witcombe, J. R. and Virk, D. S. (2001). Participatory varietal selection in rabi sorghum in India. An exchange of experiences from South and Southeast Asia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement, Pokhara, Nepal, 1–5 May 2000. Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.Google Scholar
Schiller, J. M., Chanphengxay, M. B., Linquist, B. and Appa Rao, S. (Eds.). (2006). Rice in Laos. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 457 pp.Google Scholar
Septiningsih, E. M., Pamplona, A. M., Sanchez, D. L., Neeraja, C. N., Vergara, G. V., Heuer, S., Ismail, A. M. and Mackill, D. J. (2009). Development of submergence-tolerant rice cultivars: the Sub1 locus and beyond. Annals of Botany 103:151–160.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. S. (1999). Mother and baby trials: a novel trial design being tried out in Malawi. Target Newsletter of the Southern Africa Soil Fertility Network 17:8.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. S., Kanyama-Phiri, G., Kamanga, B., Gilbert, R. and Wellard, K. (2002). Farmer and researcher partnerships in Malawi: developing soil fertility technologies for the near-term and far-term. Experimental Agriculture 38:411–431.Google Scholar
Vial, L., Sipaseuth Inthapanya, P. and Fukai, S. 2008. Farmer participatory varietal selection in Lao lowland rice systems. Global Issues, Paddock Action. Proceedings of 14th Agronomy Conference 2008, Adelaide, Australia, 21–25 September (Ed M. Unkovich).Google Scholar
Wang, W., Vergara, G. V., Li, Z., Mackill, D. J. and Ismail, A. M. (2009). Survival and grain yield of two Sub1 introgression lines as affected by variable durations of submergence. Abstract of Posters, 6th Rice Genetics Symposium, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 16–18 November. 155 pp.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R. (2001). Participatory varietal selection in high-potential production systems. In An Exchange of Experiences from South and South East Asia: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement, Pokhara, Nepal, 1–5 May 2000. Cali, Colombia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture, 459 pp.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A., Joshi, K. D. and Sthapit, B. R. 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Experience Agriculture 32:445–460.Google Scholar
Witcombe, J. R., Petre, R., Jones, S. and Joshi, A. (1999). Farmer participatory crop improvement. IV. The spread and impact of a rice variety identified by participatory varietal selection. Experience Agriculture 35:471–487.Google Scholar
Zolvinski, S. (2008). Listening to the farmers: qualitative impact assessment in unfavorable rice environments. Technical Bulletin No. 12, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines (A follow-up FGD by Asian Development Bank, and CURE).Google Scholar