Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:02:09.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sesbania brown manuring improves soil health, productivity, and profitability of post-rice bread wheat and chickpea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2021

Muhammad Farooq Open the ORCID record for Muhammad Farooq [Opens in a new window] ,
Naqib Ullah ,
Faisal Nadeem ,
Ahmad Nawaz  and
Kadambot H. M. Siddique
Muhammad Farooq*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 123, Oman Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan The UWA Institute of Agriculture and School of Agriculture & Environment, The University of Western Australia, PerthWA 6001, Australia
Naqib Ullah
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
Faisal Nadeem
Affiliation:
Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI), Central and West Asia (CWA), Satellite Town, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
Ahmad Nawaz
Affiliation:
Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI), Central and West Asia (CWA), Satellite Town, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
Kadambot H. M. Siddique
Affiliation:
The UWA Institute of Agriculture and School of Agriculture & Environment, The University of Western Australia, PerthWA 6001, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Continuous rotation of rice with wheat in rice–wheat system has resulted in stagnant yields and reduced profit margins while deteriorating the soil health. Legume incorporation in existing rice–wheat rotations might be a viable option to improve soil health and productivity. We investigated the influence of puddled transplanted flooded rice and direct-seeded rice on weed dynamics, soil health, productivity, and profitability of post-rice wheat and chickpea grown under zero tillage and conventional tillage. The previous direct-seeded rice crop was either sown alone or intercropped with sesbania as brown manure. The experiment comprised different rice–wheat and rice–chickpea systems which had been in place for two years: with and without rice residue retention. The initial soil analysis indicated that the plots with sesbania brown manuring in direct-seeded rice had the lowest soil bulk density (17.2%) and highest soil porosity (19.3%). Zero tillage in wheat or chickpea in the plots previously cultivated with co-culture of sesbania and direct-seeded rice increased total soil organic carbon by 13–22% in both years. The plots with sesbania brown manuring in direct-seeded rice followed by zero till or conventional till wheat and the plots with direct-seeded rice followed by zero till wheat with rice residue retention recorded the greater concentrations of total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and exchangeable potassium. Zero tillage in wheat and chickpea in post-rice sesbania brown manuring plots produced 41% and 43% more grain yield than those in the puddled transplanted flooded rice with conventional tillage and had the highest profitability. Overall, the rice–chickpea systems had better soil health and profitability than rice–wheat cropping systems. In conclusion, direct-seeded rice intercropped with sesbania followed by wheat and chickpea under zero tillage suppressed weed flora and improved soil physical properties, nutrient availability, productivity, and profitability.

Keywords

Brown manuringWeed managementSoil propertiesLegume incorporationConservation agricultureSustainability
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 145 - 162
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afridi, R.A., Khan, M.A., Gul, H. and Daud, M.K. (2014). Allelopathic influence of rice extracts on phenology of various crops and weeds. Pakistan Journal of Botany 46, 1211–1215.Google Scholar
Behera, B.K., Varshney, B.P. and Goel, A.K. (2009). Effect of puddling on puddled soil characteristics and performance of self-propelled transplanter in rice crop. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 10, 20–25.Google Scholar
Bertol, I., Engel, F.L., Mafra, A.L., Bertol, O.J. and Ritter, S.R. (2007). Phosphorus, potassium and organic carbon concentrations in runoff water and sediments under different soil tillage systems during soybean growth. Soil and Tillage Research 94, 142–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, G.H. and Hartge, K.H. (1986). Bulk density. In Klute, A. (ed), Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 363–375. Agronomy Monograph. 9, Part I.Google Scholar
Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S. (1982). Total nitrogen. In Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeny, D.R. (Eds), Methods of soil analysis. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 1119–1123. Agronomy Monograph. 9, Part II.Google Scholar
Capoen, W., Oldroyd, G., Goormachtig, S. and Holsters, M. (2010). Sesbania rostrata: a case study of natural variation in legume nodulation. New Phytologist 186, 340–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03124.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CIMMYT (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Mexico, DF: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.Google Scholar
Cupina, B. (2014). Cover crops for improving crop and soil management. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research, 1, 1–9. doi: 10.15406/apar.2014.01.00009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, A., Ghosh, P.K., Lal, R., Saha, R. and Ngachan, S.V. (2017). Soil quality effect of conservation practices in maize-rapeseed cropping system in eastern Himalaya. Land Degradation and Development, 28, 1862–1874. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devêvre, O.C. and Horwáth, W.R. (2000). Decomposition of rice straw and microbial carbon use efficiency under different soil temperatures and moistures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1773–1785. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00096-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooq, M., Basra, S.M.A. and Asad, S.A. (2008). Comparison of conventional puddling and dry tillage in rice-wheat system. Paddy and Water Environment, 6, 397–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-008-0138-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooq, M. and Nawaz, A. (2014). Weed dynamics and productivity of wheat in conventional and conservation rice-based cropping systems. Soil Tillage and Research, 141, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, A.C., Singh, S., McRoberts, N., Nehra, A.S., Godara, S., Malik, R.K. and Marshall, G. (2007). Phalaris minor seed-bank studies: longevity, seedling emergence and seed production as affected by tillage regime. Weed Research, 47 73–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00533.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K.N. and Clayton, G.W. (2004). Diversified weed management systems. In Inderjit Principles and Practices in Weed Management: Biology and Management. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 251–265.Google Scholar
Hobbs, P.R. and Gupta, R.K. (2003). Resource-conserving technologies for wheat in the rice-wheat system. In Ladha, J.K., Hill, J.E, Duxbury, J.M, Gupta, R.K. and Buresh, R.J. (Eds), Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice–Wheat Systems: Issues and Impacts. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy-Crop Science Society of America-Soil Science Society of America, pp. 149–172. ASA Special Publication Number 65.Google Scholar
Iliger, M.D., Sutar, R., Chogatapur, S.V. and Parameshwarareddy, R. (2017). Effect of brown manuring on soil properties, weed density, grain yield and economics of different crops. Advances in Research, 12, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A., Rauber, R. and Ludwig, B. (2009). Impact of reduced tillage on carbon and nitrogen storage of two Haplic Luvisols after 40 years. Soil and Tillage Research, 102, 158–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, E.S., Peoples, M.B. and Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2010). Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crops Research, 115, 203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladha, J.K., Dawe, D., Pathak, H., Padre, A.T., Yadav, R.L., Bijay, S., Yadvinder, S., Singh, Y., Singh, P., Kundu, A.L., Sakal, R., Ram, N., Regmi, A.P., Gami, S.K., Bhandari, A.L., Amin, R., Yadav, C.R., Bhattarai, E.M., Das, S., Aggarwal, H.P., Gupta, R.K. and Hobbs, PR (2003). How extensive are yield declines in long term rice–wheat experiments in Asia. Field Crops Research, 81, 159–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00219-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauren, J.G., Shrestha, R., Sattar, M.A. and Yadav, R.L. (2001). Legumes and diversification of the rice-wheat cropping system. Journal of Crop Production, 3, 67–102. doi: 10.1300/J144v03n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupwayi, N.Z., Hanson, K.G., Harker, K.N., Clayton, G.W., Blackshaw, R.E., O’Donovan, J.T., Johnson, E.N., Gan, Y., Irvine, R.B. and Monreal, M.A. (2007). Soil microbial biomass, functional diversity and enzyme activity in glyphosate-resistant wheat-canola rotations under low disturbance direct seeding and conventional tillage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 1418–1427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, S. and Zaman, A. (2017). Brown manuring, an effective technique for yield sustainability and weed management of cereal crops: A review. International Journal of Biological Research, 4, 1–5. doi: 10.5958/2454-9541.2017.00001.9.Google Scholar
Mandal, U.K., Singh, G., Victor, U.S. and Sharma, K.L. (2003). Green manuring: its effect on soil properties and crop growth under rice-wheat cropping system. European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 225–237. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00037-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, A.J., Riha, S.J., Duxbury, J.M., Steenhuis, T.S. and Lauren, G.J. (2006). Soil physical responses to novel rice cultural practices in the rice-wheat system comparative evidence from a swelling soil in Nepal. Soil and Tillage Research, 86, 163–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadi, K., Ghalavand, A. and Aghaalikhani, M. (2010). Effect of organic matter and biofertilizers on chickpea quality and biological nitrogen fixation. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 44, 1154–1159.Google Scholar
Mohanty, M., Painuli, D.K., Misra, A.K. and Ghosh, P.K. (2007). Soil quality effects of tillage and residue under rice-wheat cropping on a Vertisol in India. Soil and Tillage Research, 92, 243–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A. and Farooq, M. (2016). Weed management in resource conservation production systems in Pakistan. Crop Protection, 85, 89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Ahmad, R., Basra, S.M.A. and Lal, R. (2016). Seed priming improves stand establishment and productivity of no till wheat grown after direct seeded aerobic and transplanted flooded rice. European Journal of Agronomy, 76, 130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Lal, R. and Rehman, A. (2017a). Comparison of conventional and conservation rice-wheat systems in Punjab, Pakistan. Soil and Tillage Research, 169, 35–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Lal, R., Rehman, A., Hussain, T. and Nadeem, A. (2017b). Influence of sesbania brown manuring and rice residue mulch on soil health, weeds and system productivity of conservation rice-wheat systems. Land Degradation & Development, 28, 1078–1090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Nadeem, F., Siddique, K.H.M. and Lal, R. (2019). Rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia: issues, options and opportunities. Crop and Pasture Science, 70, 395–427. doi: 10.1071/CP18383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Ul-Allah, S., Gogoi, N., Lal, R. and Siddique, K.H.M. (2021). Sustainable soil management for food security in South Asia. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21, 258–275. doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00358-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939. Washington, DC: The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).Google Scholar
Pagliai, M., Vignozzi, N. and Pellegrini, S. (2004). Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil and Tillage Research, 79, 131–143. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradhan, A., Thakur, A. and Sonboir, H.L. (2014). Response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties to different levels of nitrogen under aerobic rainfed ecosystem. Indian Journal of Agronomy 59, 50–53.Google Scholar
Prasad, S.L. and Balanagoudar, S.R. (2017). Soil quality assessment in selected dry-direct seeded rice (dry-DSR) and puddled paddy fields in agro climatic zone 2 of Northern Karnataka. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience, 5, 362–368. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redona, E.D. (2004). Rice biotechnology for developing countries in Asia. In Eaglesham, A., Wildeman, A. and Hardy, R.W.F. (eds), Agricultural Biotechnology: Finding Common International Goals. USA: National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, pp. 201–232.Google Scholar
Rhoades, J.D. (1996). Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved salts. In Sparks, DL (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, WI: USA: American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America, pp. 417–435. Part 3.Google Scholar
Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline sodic and alkali soils. USDA Agricultural Handbook 60. USDA: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Saharawat, Y.S., Gathala, M., Ladha, J.K., Malik, R.K., Singh, S., Jat, M.L., Gupta, R.K., Pathak, H. and Singh, K. (2010). Evaluation and promotion of integrated crop and resource management in the rice–wheat system in northwest India. In Ladha, J.K., Yadvinder-Singh, , Erenstein, O. and Hardy, B. (Eds), Integrated Crop and Resource Management in the Rice–wheat System of South Asia. Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, pp. 151–176.Google Scholar
Shahzad, M., Farooq, M. and Hussain, M. (2016). Weed spectrum in different wheat-based cropping systems under conservation and conventional tillage practices in Punjab, Pakistan. Soil and Tillage Research, 163, 71–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. and Kaur, J. (2012). Impact of conservation tillage on soil properties in rice-wheat cropping system. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 2, 30–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-020-00802-x Google Scholar
Singh, A., Kaur, R., Kang, J.S. and Singh, G. (2012). Weed dynamics in rice–wheat cropping system. Global Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health Sciences 1, 7–16.Google Scholar
Soon, Y.K. and Arshad, M.A. (2005). Tillage and liming effects on crop and labile soil nitrogen in an acid soil. Soil Tillage and Research, 80, 23–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Dicky, D.A. (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, a Biometrical Approach, 3rd edn. New York, USA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Thomas, G.W. (1996). Soil pH and acidity. In Sparks, D.L. (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America, pp. 475–490, Part 3.Google Scholar
Vomocil, J.A. (1965). Porosity. In Blake, C.A. (ed), Methods of soil analysis. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 299–314.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Farooq et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Farooq et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.9 KB