Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T03:05:35.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantifying and Valuing the Joint Production of Grain and Fodder from Maize Fields: Evidence from Northern Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Derek Byerlee ,
Muzaffar Iqbal  and
K. S. Fischer
Derek Byerlee
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Apartado Postal 6–641, 06600 Mexico, DF, Mexico
Muzaffar Iqbal
Affiliation:
Animal Science Institute, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, PO Box 1031, Islamabad, Pakistan
K. S. Fischer
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Simple methods are proposed for measuring the relative importance of grain and fodder produced jointly from maize fields in four zones in northern Pakistan. These methods suggest that the joint production of grain and fodder from maize is important in all four zones and that fodder accounts for between one-third and one-half of the total value of the crop. The relative value of fodder production is particularly high in two of the zones (the irrigated mid-altitude Swat Valley and the rainfed low altitude Islamabad District), both characterized by a high ratio of animal numbers:maize area. The results suggest that maize research and extension recommendations that do not take into consideration the fact that farmers produce maize for fodder as well as grain will often not be accepted by farmers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 435 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bunting, E. S. (1973). Plant density and yield of grain maize in England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81:455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byerlee, D. & Hussain, S. (1986). Maize Production in NWFP: A Review of Technological Issues in Relation to Farmers' Circumstances. PARC/CIMMYT Paper No. 86–1. Islamabad: PARC/CIMMYT Collaborative Research Program.Google Scholar
Byerlee, D., Khan, K., Sheikh, A. D. & Ahmed, M. (1987). Diagnosing Research and Extension Priorities for Small Farmers: Maize in the Irrigated Swat Valley. PARC/CIMMYT Paper No. 87–19. Islamabad: PARC/CIMMYT Collaborative Research Program.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. R. (1983). Maize in Pakistan. University of Faisalabad, Pakistan: Punjab Agricultural Research Coordination Board.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. G. (1958). The relationship between corn population and yield. Agronomy Journal 50:82–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. G. (1972). Plant spacing, density, orientation, and light relationships as related to different crop genotypes. Proceedings of the Annual Corn and Sorghum Regional Conference 27:159–167.Google Scholar
Eddowes, M. (1969). Physiological studies of competition in Zea mays L. II. Effects of competition among maize plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmeades, G. O. & Daynard, T. (1979). The development of plant-to-plant variability in maize at different planting densities. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 59:561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. S. & Javed, H. I. (1986). Production of Maize Grain and Fodder in the North West Frontier Province and Islamabad Capital Territory of Pakistan. PARC/CIMMYT Paper No. 86–3. Islamabad: PARC/CIMMYT Collaborative Research Program.Google Scholar
Fitch, , James, B. (1983). Maize Production Practices and Problems in Egypt: Results of Three Farmer Surveys. CIMM YTEconomics Program Working Paper No. 03/83. Mexico: CIMMYTGoogle Scholar
Francis, C. S., Temple, R. R., Flor, C. A. & Grogan, C. O. (1978). Effects of competition in maize. Field Crops Research 1:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1960). Plant population and crop yield. Field Crop Abstracts 13:159–167; 247–254.Google Scholar
Khan, K. (1987). Study of Different Varieties of Maize Under Traditional and Modified Management Practices in Swat, N.W.F.P. MSc Thesis, Peshawar: Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, N.W.F.P. Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Khan, K., Byerlee, D., Salim, M. & Ahmed, M. (1986). Farmer-Managed Verification of Improved Maize Technology: Results from Swat, 1985. PARC/CIMMYT Paper No. 86–12. Islamabad: PARC/CIMMYT Collaborative Program.Google Scholar
Schoper, J. B., Johnson, R. R. & Lambert, R. J. (1982). Maize yield response to increased assimilate supply. Crop Science 22:1184–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar